Y. Yu et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 471 (2009) 268–271
271
the supercapacitive performance is inherent in the material itself.
There is no absolute morphological impact on supercapacitor mate-
rials’ supercapacitive behavior. So as a whole, we cannot say in this
article, that the favorable supercapacitive performance has direct
and confirmed link to the morphologic character of CoO.
4. Conclusion
Cuspate deltoid CoO crystallites were prepared by developing
the Co3O4 nanoplatelets precursor in NaCl/KCl flux. The resulted
morphology and structure of the CoO crystallites indicate that the
cubic Co3O4 spontaneously decomposed during the deoxidation
process, and there was no change in the lattice structure dur-
ing Co3O4-to-CoO transformation. The preliminary electrochemical
test results show that the prepared CoO sample behaves as super-
capacitor, for the galvanostatic charge/discharge peaks are clearly
visible, and the overlapping reactions lead to the current–voltage
signatures similar to that of a supercapacitor, this results persuade
us to accept the CoO as promising supercapacitor materials. Addi-
tionally, the growth of the crystalline CoO in KCl/NaCl flux is in
accordance with the Ostwald ripening mechanism and the layer
growth theory, starting from the step kink of the screw disloca-
tions on the crystal surface and resulted in the layered and cuspate
deltoid surface appearance of CoO particle. This synthetic method
may extend to prepare other transition-metal oxides for different
applications in chemical sensors, high-density electronic devices
and lithium-ion batteries.
Acknowledgements
Financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation
of China (50502020 and 50701024) is gratefully acknowledged.
Fig. 4. (a) CVs of the as-prepared CoO electrode at a sweep rate of 10 mV s−1 using
2 M KOH as the electrolyte at room temperature; (b) galvanostatic charge/discharge
References
[1] S. Massidda, M. Posternak, A. Baldereschi, R. Resta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999)
430–435.
[2] N. Koshizaki, K. Yasumoto, T. Sasaki, Sens. Actuat. B. 66 (2000) 122–124.
[3] J.L. Mackay, V.E. Henrich, Phys. Rev. B 39 (1989) 6156–6160.
[4] H.K. Lin, H.C. Chiu, H.C. Tsai, S.H. Chien, C.B. Wang, Catal. Lett. 88 (2003) 169–174.
[5] S. Sarangapani, B.V. Tilak, C.P. Chen, J. Electrochem. Soc. 143 (1996) 3791–3795.
[6] E. Antolini, E. Zhecheva, Mater. Lett. 35 (1998) 380–382.
[7] D.N. Srivastava, N. Perkas, G.A. Seisenbaeva, Y. Koltypin, Ultrason. Sonochem.
10 (2003) 1–3.
[8] V. Skumryev, S. Stoyanov, Y. Zhang, G. Hadjipanayis, D. Givord, Nature 423
(2003) 850–853.
[9] R.W. Grimes, A.N. Fitch, J. Mater. Chem. 1 (1991) 461–465.
[10] M.J. Redman, E.G. Steward, Nature 193 (1962) 867–870.
[11] A.S. Risbud, L.P. Snedeker, M.M. Elcombe, A.K. Cheetham, Chem. Mater. 17
(2005) 834–839.
[12] W.S. Seo, J.H. Shim, S.J. Oh, E.K. Lee, N.H. Hur, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 (2005)
6188–6190.
[13] J.F. Liu, Y. He, W. Chen, G.Q. Zhang, Y.W. Zeng, J. Phys. Chem. C 111 (2007) 2–5.
[14] J.F. Liu, S. Yin, H.P. Wu, Y.W. Zeng, X.R. Hu, J. Phys. Chem. B 110 (2006)
21588–21592.
[15] M. Ghosh, E.V. Sampathkumaran, C. Rao, Chem. Mater. 17 (2005) 2348–2351.
[16] M. Verelst, T.O. Ely, C. Amiens, E. Snoeck, P. Lecante, A. Mosset, M. Respaud, J.M.
Broto, B. Chaudret, Chem. Mater. 11 (1999) 2702–2705.
[17] K. An, N. Lee, J. Park, S.C. Kim, Y. Hwang, J.G. Park, J.Y. Kim, J.H. Park, M.J. Han,
J.J. Yu, T. Hyeon, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128 (2006) 9753–9756.
[18] Y.L. Hou, H. Kondoh, M. Shimojo, T. Kogure, T. Ohta, J. Phys. Chem. B 109 (2005)
19094–19096.
[19] C. Lin, J.A. Ritter, B.N. Popov, J. Electrochem. Soc. 145 (1998) 4097–4099.
[20] F.B. Zhang, Y.K. Zhou, H.L. Li, Mater. Chem. Phys. 83 (2004) 260–263.
[21] Q.Z. Guo, H.K. Mao, J.Z. Hu, J.F. Shu, J. Phys: Condens. Matter 14 (2002)
11369–11372.
taking into account the excessive O element introduction during
the testing process.
Fig. 4a illustrates the CVs of the prepared CoO electrode
cycled in negative potentials at a sweep rate of 10 mV s−1 in
the voltage range from 0.0 to 0.5 V. The electrode was stable for
>1000 cycles. The CV curves (0.0–0.5 V) reveal a pair of current
peaks corresponding to the surface Faradic reactions according
to: CoO + OH− ⇔ CoOOH + e−, which is comparable to the redox
reaction seen in nickel oxide material [26]. The reason for non-
rectangular profile of CV could be due to the increase in the particle
size of CoO owing to the aggregation of electrolyte ions. The specific
capacitance of the CoO was estimated from the CVs by integrating
the area under the current–potential curve and then dividing by
the sweep rate v, the mass of the film m and the potential win-
dow according to the equation: 1/(mv(Va − Vc)) Vc I(V) dV, where
Va
(Va − Vc) represents the potential window. The specific capaci-
tance value of the CoO in this experiment was calculated as 88 F/g
using KOH as the electrolyte at room temperature according to
the above equation. The curve in Fig. 4a showed a rapid current
response on voltage reversal at each end potential, indicating the
high-electrochemical reversibility of the CoO. The performances of
the electrochemical capacitor were further confirmed by the gal-
vanostatic charge/discharge characteristics at a current density of
10 mA/cm2. Fig. 4b shows the typical curves (four cycles) of the CoO
sample electrode in potential range between 0 and 0.5 V in 2 M KOH
electrolyte. The almost constant slopes of these discharge curves
reveal that the CoO electrode has high-electrochemical reversibil-
ity and excellent capacitive characteristics. It should be noted that
[22] V. Srinivasan, J.W. Weidner, J. Power Sources 108 (2002) 15–19.
[23] R.S. Young, Cobalt, Its Chemistry Mutallurgy and Users, Reinhold Publ. Corp.,
New York, 1960.
[24] W.Z. Wang, C.K. Xu, G.H. Wang, Y.K. Liu, C.L. Zheng, Adv. Mater. 14 (2002)
837–841.
[25] P.W. Vorhees, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 22 (1992) 197–199.
[26] Y.G. Wang, Y.Y. Xia, Electrochim. Acta 51 (2006) 3223–3224.