A908
Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 154 ͑10͒ A901-A909 ͑2007͒
semicircle is depressed, and Q2 was used because the low-frequency
behavior is not ideal capacitive. The nonideal nature of capacitances
arise due to the nonhomogeneous nature of the electrode.55 The
impedance data were subjected to NLLS fitting program and the
impedance parameters were obtained. The theoretical curves gener-
ated from the fit results ͑solid lines in Fig. 12͒ match with the
2
experimental data and the fitting parameter is always less than
1 ϫ 10−3. An enlarged view of the Nyquist plot at the high-
frequency regime is given as an inset in Fig. 12a. It was found that
Rct of 3.17 ⍀ cm−2 for MnO2͑s͒ is smaller than 15.23 ⍀ cm−2 for
MnO2, which implies that the cation insertion/extraction process
into/from MnO2͑s͒ lattice is more facile than in the case of MnO2.
In Bode plots of impedance spectra of MnO2 and MnO2͑s͒ ͑Fig.
12b͒, maximum phase-angle values of about 51 and 74° are ob-
served for MnO2 and MnO2͑s͒, respectively. It is inferred that
MnO2͑s͒ is a better capacitive material in comparison with MnO2.
Conclusion
In order to improve the specific capacitance, ␦ MnO2 has been
electrodeposited from a neutral Mn2+ aqueous solution consisting of
Triton X-100 as the surfactant. The electrodeposited films of MnO2
in the presence of the surfactant possess greater porosity, and hence
surface area, in relation to the films prepared in the absence of the
surfactant. Cyclic voltammetry and galvanostatic charge-discharge
cycling experiments reveal that the SC is higher by about 59% due
to the effect of Triton X-100. It has been found that 10 mM Triton
X-100 in 0.5 M MnSO4 solution is the optimum concentration for
obtaining maximum SC. Extended charge-discharge cycling studies
indicate that the superior performance of MnO2 due to Triton X-100
is present throughout the life-cycle.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank K.C. Suresh for surface-area measurements.
S.D. acknowledges a senior research fellowship from the Council of
Scientific and Industrial Research ͑CSIR͒, New Delhi, India.
Figure 12. Electrochemical impedance spectra as ͑a, top͒ Nyquist plot and
͑b, bottom͒ Bode plot of ͑i͒ MnO2 and ͑ii͒ MnO2͑s͒ recorded at open-circuit
potential ͑0.7 V vs SCE͒. The experimental data points are shown as circles
and theoretical curves as solid lines. In ͑a͒ expanded view of Nyquist plot at
high-frequency regime is shown as inset and frequency values of some data
points in Hz are also shown.
References
1. B. E. Conway, Electrochemical Supercapacitors, p. 1, Kluwer Academic
Publishers/Plenum Press, New York ͑1999͒.
2. B. E. Conway, J. Electrochem. Soc., 138, 1539 ͑1991͒.
3. S. Sarangapani, B. V. Tilak, and C. P. Chen, J. Electrochem. Soc., 143, 3791
͑1996͒.
4. A. Burke, J. Power Sources, 91, 37 ͑2000͒.
5. J. P. Zheng and T. R. Jow, J. Electrochem. Soc., 142, L6 ͑1995͒.
6. J. P. Zheng, P. J. Cygan, and T. R. Jow, J. Electrochem. Soc., 142, 2699 ͑1995͒.
7. J. P. Zheng, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett., 2, 359 ͑1999͒.
8. H. Y. Lee and J. B. Goodenough, J. Solid State Chem., 144, 220 ͑1999͒.
9. S. C. Pang, M. A. Anderson, and T. W. Chapman, J. Electrochem. Soc., 147, 444
͑2000͒.
the low-frequency linear plot of impedance should make 45° to the
real axis if the process is under diffusion control in the low-
frequency regime, or it should make 90° if the behavior of the sys-
tem is purely capacitive in nature. However, the linear plot of the
data of Fig. 12a exhibits an angle between 45 and 90°. The imped-
ance data ͑Fig. 12͒ were analyzed using the electrical equivalent
circuit shown in Fig. 13. The circuit elements are explained as fol-
lows. R⍀ represents the electrolyte resistance ͑equivalent to the
high-frequency intercept on the real axis͒, Rct is charge-transfer re-
sistance ͑equal to diameter of the semicircle͒, Q1 is constant phase
element ͑CPE͒ used in place of double-layer capacitance ͑Cdl͒, W is
Warburg arising from a diffusion-controlled process at low fre-
quency, and Q2 is CPE used in place of the pseudo-capacitance of
the material. The CPE, Q1, was used instead of Cdl because the
10. H. Y. Lee, S. W. Kim, and H. Y. Lee, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett., 4, A19
͑2001͒.
11. C. C. Hu and T. W. Tsou, Electrochem. Commun., 4, 105 ͑2002͒.
12. M. Toupin, T. Brousse, and D. Belanger, Chem. Mater., 14, 3946 ͑2002͒.
13. Y. U. Jeong and A. Manthiram, J. Electrochem. Soc., 149, A1419 ͑2002͒.
14. J. K. Chang and W. T. Tsai, J. Electrochem. Soc., 150, A1333 ͑2003͒.
15. Y. T. Wu and C. C. Hu, J. Electrochem. Soc., 151, A2060 ͑2004͒.
16. J. K. Chang, C. T. Lin, and W. T. Tsai, Electrochem. Commun., 6, 666 ͑2004͒.
17. Y. S. Chen, C. C. Hu, and Y. T. Wu, J. Solid State Electrochem., 8, 467 ͑2004͒.
18. B. Djurfors, J. N. Broughton, M. Brett, and D. G. Ivey, J. Mater. Sci., 38, 4617
͑2003͒.
19. Y. S. Chen and C. C. Hu, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett., 6, A210 ͑2003͒.
20. C. C. Hu and C. C. Wang, J. Electrochem. Soc., 150, A1079 ͑2003͒.
21. M. Toupin, T. Brousse, and D. Belanger, Chem. Mater., 16, 3184 ͑2004͒.
22. M. S. Wu and P. C. J. Chiang, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett., 7, A122 ͑2004͒.
23. J. N. Broughton and M. J. Brett, Electrochim. Acta, 50, 4814 ͑2005͒.
24. V. Subramanian, H. Zhu, R. Vajtai, P. M. Ajayan, and B. Wei, J. Phys. Chem. B,
109, 20207 ͑2005͒.
25. C. C. Hu and T. W. Tsou, J. Power Sources, 115, 179 ͑2003͒.
26. S. L. Kuo and N. L. Wu, J. Electrochem. Soc., 153, A1317 ͑2006͒.
27. X. Huang, H. Yue, A. Attia, and Y. Yang, J. Electrochem. Soc., 154, A26 ͑2007͒.
28. R. Foucault, R. L. Birke, and J. R. Lombardi, Langmuir, 19, 8818 ͑2003͒.
29. C. Hu, X. Dang, and S. Hu, J. Electroanal. Chem., 572, 161 ͑2004͒.
30. N. Munichandraiah and S. Sathyanarayana, J. Appl. Electrochem., 17, 22 ͑1987͒.
31. M. Ghaemi, L. Khosravi-Fard, and J. Neshati, J. Power Sources, 141, 340 ͑2005͒.
32. S. Devaraj and N. Munichandraiah, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett., 8, A373 ͑2005͒.
33. M. Ghaemi, E. Ghafouri, and J. Neshati, J. Power Sources, 157, 550 ͑2006͒.
Figure 13. Electrical equivalent circuit used to fit impedance spectra. Sym-
bols are explained in the text.
Downloaded on 2013-01-22 to IP 150.108.161.71 address. Redistribution subject to ECS license or copyright; see www.esltbd.org