SPHERICAL NiO NANOPARTICLES
1329
TABLE 1
tical absorption bandgap of the nickel oxide nanoparticles was
estimated to be 1.515 eV and 1.182 eV at temperatures of 400
and 500◦C, respectively. The synthetic method presented herein
is novel in the sense that it does not involve any templates or sur-
factants, so it may be suitable for bulk production of spherical
NiO nanoparticles.
Optical energy gap Eg (eV), refractive index n, dielectric
constant ε, molar volume Vm (cm3), molar refraction Rm, (cm3
mol−1), and metallization criterion M(n)
Sample number
Eopt
n
ε
Rm/Vm
M(n)
a
b
1.515 2.98
1.182 3.216 10.34
8.88
0.725
0.757
0.275
0.243
REFERENCES
1. Mishra, Y.K.; Mohapatra, S.; Avasthi, D.K.; Lalla, N.P.; Gupta, A. Adv.
Mat. Lett. 2010, 1, 151.
2. Rai, R.; Sharma, S. Adv. Mat. Lett. 2010, 1, 269.
3. Yang, H.; Tao, Q.; Zhang, X.; Tang, A.; Ouyang, J. J. Alloys Compd. 2008,
459, 98.
4. Guerra, C.D.; Remo´n, A.; Garc´ıa, J.A.; Piqueras, J. Phys. Stat. Sol. 1997,
163, 497.
5. Richardson, T.; Yiagas, D.I.; Turk, B.; Forster, K.; Twigg, M.A. J. Appl.
Phys. 1991, 70, 6977.
The Lorentz–Lorenz relationship, Eq. (3), becomes the
Clausisus–Mossotti expression on replacing n2 by the (high fre-
quency) dielectric constant, ε (strictly, this is for n at infinite
wavelength). If, next, molar refractivity, Rm, replaces polaris-
ability, αm, Eq. (3) becomes
6. Bahadur, J.; Sen, D.; Mazumder, S.; Ramanathan, S. J. Solid State Chem.
2008, 181, 1227.
Rm = Vmε − 1/ε + 2
[4]
7. Nathan, T.; Aziz, A.; Noor, A.F.; Prabaharan, S.R.S. J. Solid State Elec-
trochem. 2008, 12, 1003.
8. Granqvist, C.G. (Ed.), Handbook of Inorganic Electrochromic Materials;
Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1995.
(with Rm in cm3mol−1 and Rm = 2.5 αm). Equation (4) has very
important implications for the transition from the nonmetallic
state to the metallic state.[40]
9. Felic, A.C.; Lama, F.; Piacentini, M.J. J. Appl. Phys. 1997, 80, 3678.
10. Yang, H.X.; Dong, Q.F.; Hu, X.H. J. Power Sources 1998, 74, 46.
11. Xiang, L.; Deng, X.Y.; Jin, Y. Scr. Mater. 2002, 47, 219.
12. Turky, A.M. Appl. Catal., A Gen. 2003, 247, 83.
13. Seo, D.J.; Park, S.B.; Kang, Y.C.; Choy, K.L. J. Nanopart. Res. 2003, 5,
199.
14. Meneses, C.T.; Flores, W.H.; Garcia, F.; Sasaki, J.M. J. Nanopart. Res.
2007, 9, 501.
15. Palanisamy, P.; Raicher, A.M. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2009, 29, 199.
16. Wang, D.B.; Song, C.X.; Hu, Z.S.; Fu, X. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109,
1125.
According to the theory on metallization of the condensed
matter proposed by Herzfeld,[41] for the condition Rm/Vm = 1
in the Lorentz–Lorenz equation the refractive index becomes
infinite, which corresponds to the metallization of covalent solid
materials. In other words, the electron becomes itinerant and the
system acquires metallic status. The necessary and sufficient
conditions for predicting the nonmetallic or metallic nature of
solids are Rm/Vm < 1 (nonmetal) and Rm/Vm > 1 (metal). The
difference from 1 is the so-called metallization criterion[42]
17. Zhu, J.X.; Gui, Z.; Ding, Y.Y.; Wang, Z.Z.; Hu, Y.; Zou, M.Q. J. Phys.
Chem. C 2007, 111, 5622.
18. Zhou, Q.; Gu, F.; Li, C. J. Alloys Compounds 2009, 474, 358.
19. Bai, L.; Yuan, F.; Hu, P.; Yan, S.; Wang, X.; Li, S. Mater. Lett. 2007, 61,
1698.
20. Liu, J.; Du, S.; Wei, L.; Liu, H.; Tian, Y.; Chen, Y. Mater. Lett. 2006, 60,
3601.
21. Wu, L.; Wu, Y.; Wei, H.; Shi, Y.; Hu, C. Mater. Lett. 2004, 58, 2700.
22. Klug, H.; Alexander, L. (Eds.), X-Ray Diffraction Procedures; Wiley: New
York, 1962, p. 125.
M = 1 − Rm/Vm
[5]
Equation (5) indicates that when (1 – Rm/Vm) becomes zero the
transition to the metal state takes place. The physical properties
of the as-synthesized and calcined materials are provided in
Table 1.
CONCLUSION
23. Oliva, P.; Leonardi, J.; Laurent, J.F.; Delmas, C.; Braconnier, J.F.;
Figlarz, M.; Fievet, F.; De Guibert, A. J. Power Sources 1982, 8,
229.
24. Genin, P.; Delahaye-Vidal, A.; Portemer, F.; Tekaia-Elhsissen, K.; Iglarz,
M.F. Eur. J. Solid State Inorg. Chem. 1991, 28, 505.
25. Ho, K.C.; Jorne, J. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1990, 137, 149.
26. Soler-Illia, G.J.; Regazzoni, A.E.; Blesa, M.A. Chem. Mater. 1999, 11,
3140.
27. Jayalakshmi, M.; Venugopal, N.; Reddy, B.R.; Mohan, R.M. J. Power
Sources 2005, 150, 272.
28. Jeevanandam, P.; Koltypin, Y.; Gedanken, A. Nano. Lett. 2001, 1, 263.
29. Pejova, B.; Kocareva, T.; Najdoski, M.; Grozdanov, I. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2000,
165, 271.
Highly crystalline and spherical nanoparticles (SNPs) of NiO
have been prepared successfully by a simple, modified, and in-
expensive solvothermal method using NiCl2·6H2O and urea as
the starting materials and ethanol as the refluxing solvent. It is
found that the crystallite size of the nickel oxide varies with the
calcination temperature, such that the crystallite size increases
linearly with increase in temperature. The morphological dif-
ference induced by the final calcination temperature also affects
the optical properties of the nickel oxide. Evaluation of the
optical properties in combination with observation of the mor-
phology of nickel oxide by SEM analysis suggests that there
is an optimum calcination temperature for nickel oxide. FTIR
studies give broad absorption maxima in the frequency range
421–423 cm−1, suggestive of nanocrystalline particles. The op-
30. Biju, V.; Abdul Khaddar, M. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc.
2003, 59, 121.
31. Preudhomme, J.; Tarte, P. Spectrochim. Acta 1967, 23A, 2127.
32. Bellotto, M.; Rebours, B.; Clause, O.; Lynch, J.; Bazin, D.; Elkain, E. Phys.
Chem. 1996, 100, 8535.