M.A. Marturano et al. / Thermochimica Acta 336 (1999) 55±60
59
viour. These catalysts present good levels of initial
activity in steam, CO2 or air reforming of methane to
synthesis gas [10±12]. One of the main problems is the
deactivation by sintering, mechanism favoured by
high temperatures and by the presence of steam.
For this reason, steam reforming of methane is a very
good stability test.
With the conditions used, NiEV and NiCOPU sys-
tems (pure NiO) are completely deactivated after 7 h
deactivating treatment. Instead, NiAlEV and NiAl-
COPU systems are much more stable and after 7 h
deactivating treatment, they maintain approximately
more than 80% initial activity (ꢁꢀ0.80). In these last
systems, due to the existence of structures where Ni
and Al are intimately related, aluminium oxide phases
disperse crystallites of the metallic nickel (active
phase) acting as barriers inhibiting Ni sintering. This
effect favours notably the thermal stability of the
system. Although intermediate stages depend on pre-
paration method used (hydrotalcites, nitrates, see Part
I), solids obtained at the end of the calcination stage
present properties and tendencies qualitatively simi-
lar: aluminate phases (XRD), comparable reduction
zones (TGA±DTG), stability with respect to sintering.
Figs. 9 and 10 show catalytic results obtained for
supported catalysts prepared by impregnation and
deposition±precipitation, respectively. For both pre-
paration methods, the Al presence (co-impregnation
or deposition±precipitation on modi®ed supports) is
essential to generate solids with higher stability. As it
was stated for bulk catalysts, the Al presence generates
barriers to the sintering mechanism of nickel phase,
which improves notably the stability of these catalytic
Fig. 10. Activity coefficient evolution (ꢀ) vs. deactivation time (t)
for NiDP/S and NiDP/S Al catalysts.
systems. The greatest dif®culty in the reduction of
nickel in NiDP/(S Al) solid with respect to NiAl/S
(see Figs. 6 and 8) may be explained by the higher
interaction between Ni and Al in the system prepared
by deposition±precipitation. This fact is in agreement
with the higher relative stability observed in curves
represented in Figs. 9 and 10. This interpretation is
also valid in the supported systems on a-Al2O3 with-
out modi®cation since NiDP/S catalyst is more stable
than Ni/S catalyst and this result is coherent with
TGA±DTG diagrams shown in Figs. 5 and 7.
4. Conclusions
The use of TGA±DTG permits to study the H2
reducibility of different catalysts based on Ni (bulk
and supported), as a function of the different prepara-
tion techniques used.
Those preparations that lead to a strong interaction
between Ni and Al (co-precipitation, co-impregnation,
deposition±precipitation), generate Ni phases more
dif®cult to be reduced. This is produced by the for-
mation of mixed oxides (spinel type non-stoichio-
metric) when a Al/Ni 0.5 atomic ratio is used.
The catalytic stability of these systems, in the
methane steam reforming process, is related to the
catalyst reducibility. When the Ni reduction is more
dif®cult to be performed, there exists higher interac-
tion between Ni and Al and higher thermal stability.
It was possible to ®x Ni via alkalinization with the
urea on a-Al2O3 supports modi®ed by an aluminium
oxide layer. This method led to the formation of Ni
Fig. 9. Activity coefficient evolution (ꢀ) vs. deactivation time (t)
for Ni/S and NiAl/S catalysts.