Communication
that the photogenerated P-centred radical can also be added
to the metal center of the NiII intermediate II in the photore-
dox/nickel dual-catalytic system, thus providing an efficient al-
ternative method for forging CÀP bonds in a controllable
manner. As part of our ongoing research interest in the devel-
opment of new photocatalytic chemical transformations,[14] we
herein describe an efficient redoxneutral CÀP bond formation
reaction by merging nickel catalysis with visible-light photore-
dox catalysis (Scheme 1c). To the best of our knowledge, this
is the first example of a CÀheteroatom bond formation reac-
tion by using the combination of visible-light photoredox cat-
alysis and nickel catalysis.
revealed that the GC yield of 3a could be slightly increased
when [Ru(bpy)3Cl6].6H2O was used as the photoredox catalyst
(entry 7, 72% yield). Next, we examined the influence of the
base on this CÀP bond formation reaction. Compared with the
reaction involving Cs2CO3, the reaction proceeded less effi-
ciently with other bases, such as K2CO3, KOH, and 1,8-diazabi-
cyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU; entries 8–10). Other reaction pa-
rameters, including the ratio of 1a to 2a and the catalyst load-
ing, were also carefully screened (entries 11–13). A similar GC
yield was obtained when 2.0 equivalents of 1a were employed
(entry 11). To our delight, the yield of 3a could be increased to
83% when a 1:2 ratio of 1a to 2a was used. Finally, 91% GC
yield (90% isolated yield) was achieved when the reaction was
performed in the presence of 5 mol% [Ru(bpy)3Cl6]·6H2O and
2 mol% [Ni(cod)2]/dtbbpy with 2.0 equivalents of Cs2CO3
(entry 13). The critical role of the nickel catalyst, the photore-
dox catalyst, light irradiation and the base, as well as the de-
gassing procedure were demonstrated through control experi-
ments in which no or only a trace amount of the desired prod-
uct was detected upon omission of any of these components
(Table 1, entries 14–18).
Our proposed dual-catalytic CÀP formation reaction was ini-
tially evaluated by using 4-iodoanisole (1a) and diphenylphos-
phine oxide 2a along with 10 mol% [Ni(cod)2], 10 mol%
dtbbpy as the ligand, 2 mol% [Ir{dF(CF3)ppy}2(dtbbpy)]PF6 pho-
toredox catalyst, Cs2CO3, and a 3W blue LED at room tempera-
ture (Table 1).[15] To our delight, we observed the desired CÀP
bond formation product 3a when using DMSO as the reaction
media, albeit in a modest 16% yield (entry 1). It was observed
that the solvent selection had a significant effect on the yield
of the coupling reaction (entries 2–4), with MeOH being the
best choice (entry 3, 65% yield). Moreover, the use of
a number of commonly used nickel catalysts did not improve
the reaction efficiency (entries 5 and 6). Further investigations
With the optimal reaction conditions in hand, we next
probed the scope of this dual catalytic CÀP formation process.
As shown in Table 2, a series of diversely substituted aryl io-
dides reacted readily with diphenylphosphine oxide 2a under
the optimal conditions. Incorporation of electron-donating
(-Me, -OMe) or electron-withdrawing groups (-F, -Cl, -Br) at the
para-position of iodobenzene were tolerated well, affording
the corresponding coupling products 3a–f in generally high
yields (entries 1–6, 71–91% yields). In addition, this dual cata-
lytic reaction allowed for a broad range of functional groups
on the aryl ring (e.g., phenols, amines, amides, and ethers) to
be accommodated (entries 7–11, 81–86% yield). More signifi-
cantly, the sterically encumbered 1-iodonaphthalene 1l proved
to be a viable partner, affording the CÀP formation product 3l
in 90% yield (entry 12). To our delight, the methyl-modified
secondary phosphine oxide 2b also proved to be a competent
reactant to provide triarylphosphine oxide 3m in 69% yield
(entry 13). It is well documented that electron-rich secondary
phosphine oxides exist nearly exclusively in their pentavalent
tautomeric form, which prevents them from participating in
the photo-oxidation step to give the key P-centered radical in-
termediates.13,16 As expected, no desired CÀP bond formation
products were detected when dicyclohexylphosphine oxide 2c
and ethyl phenylphosphinate 2d were utilized under the best
reaction conditions (entries 14 and 15).
Table 1. Optimization of the reaction conditions.[a]
Entry
[Ni]
PC
Solvent
Base
Yield [%][b]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11[c]
12[d]
13[e]
14
15
16
17[g]
18[h]
Ni(cod)2
Ni(cod)2
Ni(cod)2
Ni(cod)2
NiCl2(PPh3)2
[Ir]
[Ir]
[Ir]
[Ir]
[Ir]
[Ir]
[Ru]
[Ru]
[Ru]
[Ru]
[Ru]
[Ru]
[Ru]
[Ru]
–
DMSO
CH3CN
MeOH
DCM
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
K2CO3
KOH
16
6
65
4
45
42
72
63
39
71
70
83
91 (90)[f]
6
MeOH
MeOH
MeOH
MeOH
MeOH
MeOH
MeOH
MeOH
MeOH
MeOH
MeOH
MeOH
MeOH
MeOH
.
NiCl2 glyme
Ni(cod)2
Ni(cod)2
Ni(cod)2
Ni(cod)2
Ni(cod)2
Ni(cod)2
Ni(cod)2
–
Ni(cod)2
Ni(cod)2
Ni(cod)2
Ni(cod)2
DBU
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
–
0
[Ru]
[Ru]
[Ru]
trace
0
Notably, this photoredox/nickel dual-catalytic process could
be extended further to the coupling of diarylphosphine oxide
with heteroaryl iodides. For example, 5-iodo-1H-indole (1m)
and 2-iodopyridine (1n) can facilely react with diphenylphos-
phine oxide 2a, giving the corresponding CÀP bond formation
products 3p and 3q in 84 and 75% yield, respectively [Eq. (1)
and (2)]. It is worth noting that the photoredox catalyst
[Ir(ppy)2(bpy)]PF6 was observed to be superior in the latter case.
A plausible reaction mechanism was proposed in Scheme 2
to explain this dual catalytic CÀP bond formation process. The
photocatalytic cycle starts with the reductive quenching of ex-
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
0
[a] Reaction conditions: 1a (0.36 mmol), 2a (0.3 mmol), Ni catalyst
(10 mol%), dtbbpy (10 mol%), PC (2 mol%), base (0.6 mmol), and solvent
(3 mL) at RT for 24 h under the irradiation of a 3W blue LED. [b] GC yield
by using tetradecane as the internal standard. [c] 1a (0.6 mmol), 2a
(0.3 mmol). [d] 1a (0.3 mmol), 2a (0.6 mmol). [e] [Ni(cod)2] (2 mol%),
dtbbpy (2 mol%), photocatalyst (5 mol%). [f] Isolated yield in parentheses.
[g] Without visible-light irradiation. [h] Without the degassing procedure.
[Ir]: [Ir{dF(CF3)ppy}2(dtbbpy)]PF6, [Ru]: [Ru(bpy)3Cl2]·6H2O, cod=1,5-cyclo-
octadiene, glyme=1,2-dimethoxyethane, DMSO=dimethyl sulfoxide,
DBU=1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene. PC=photocatalyst.
&
&
Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 1 – 5
2
ꢀ 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
ÝÝ These are not the final page numbers!