Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2020, 16, 351–361.
oligomerization degree was 4. The reaction has excellent selec- added into a 100 mL glass flask equipped with magnetic stirrer,
tivity and no other byproducts were detected except water. a reflux condenser and connected with vacuum line. Then,
More remarkably, a simple stratifying at room temperature will under a stirrer rate of 500 r/min, the temperature was increased
cause the separation of catalyst and product, which means the to 190 °C to promote the esterification reaction. Simultaneous-
additional solvent extraction or distillation separation em- ly, the reaction run at 50 kPa to remove the generated water.
ployed in the traditional IL catalysis was unnecessary in this After 2 h of reaction, the reaction mixture was cooled to room
system. Besides, the catalyst can be reused at least for five temperature for stratifying. The supernatant was oligomeric
cycles without significant activity lost. Therefore, this protocol ricinoleic acid and it could be decanted directly for further treat-
employing the Brønsted acidic ionic liquid as catalyst repre- ment and acid value analysis. The IL catalyst deposited in the
sents a green synthesis method for oligomeric ricinoleic acid lower layer can be washed with a small amount of dichloro-
and can be run in environmentally manner. It is a promising methane to remove the residual oligoester. After that, the fresh
candidate for the commercial production of oligomeric rici- ricinoleic acid was added for the second run reaction and the
noleic acid from ricinoleic acid.
recovered catalyst can be used repeatedly.
Experimental
Preparation procedure of [HSO3-
BDBU]H2PO4
Product characterization
The oligomeric ricinoleic acid is a yellow oily liquid, and all
experiments have yields greater than 90%, which are deter-
To prepare the IL [HSO3-BDBU]H2PO4, 0.1 mol (13.6 g) 1,4- mined by weighing. The spectral results identified the product.
butane sultone was mixed with 0.1 mol (15.2 g) 1,8-diazobi- 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.85–0.88 (t, J = 3.9 Hz, 3H),
cyclo[5,4,0]undec-7-ene (DBU) in a flask containing 50 mL of 1.26–1.29 (m, 16H), 1.51–1.60 (m, 4H), 2.00–2.01 (m, 2H),
acetonitrile. After 24 h reflux at 80 °C, the reaction mixture was 2.25–2.26 (m, 4H), 4.86–4.89 (m, 1H), 5.30–5.46 (m, 2H) ppm;
cooled to room temperature. Then 30 mL diethyl ether was 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 14.08, 22.58, 25.11, 25.35,
added to the reaction mixture to precipitate the product. After 27.20–27.35, 29.03–29.71, 31.75, 31.98, 33.62, 34.65, 73.69,
that, the precipitate was collected by filtration and washed twice 124.30, 132.51, 173.58 ppm; FTIR (KBr) νmax/cm−1: 3416.44,
with diethyl ether. The resulting light yellow precipitate was 3010.55, 2927.89, 2855.81, 1733.38, 1711.66, 1464.22,
then dried in vacuum at 60 ºC for 4 h. Afterwards, the aqueous 1245.41, 1183.74, 725.11; ESIMS (+) m/z: 579.3, 876.6,
solution containing a stoichiometric amount of phosphoric acid 1139.7, 1437.8, 1716.9, 1997.1.
was added dropwise to 50 mL CH2Cl2 containing 0.05 mol
(
14.4 g) [HSO3-BDBU] and stirred at 60 °C for 4 h, forming a Acid value determination
separated by centrifugation. Then the viscous liquid was ASTM D664 method [33], in which about 1 g sample was
washed twice with CH2Cl2 and dried at 100 ºC for 12 h, obtain- dissolved in 30 mL CH2Cl2 and the resulting solution was
ing 18.6 g yellow viscous liquid with the yield of 96%. The re- titrated against standard 0.1 N isopropanol KOH. Acid value
sulting compound was identified to be IL [HSO3- (mg KOH/g sample) was then calculated as follows:
BDBU]H2PO4. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 1.62–1.67
(
2
(
2
m, 10H), 1.92–1.98 (m, 2H), 2.41–2.45 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H),
.85–2.88 (t, J = 4.8, 2H), 3.42–3.62 (m, 8H) ppm; 13C NMR
100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 19.65, 22.13, 22.88, 25.55, 27.12,
7.22, 27.90, 46.58, 48.52, 50.65, 52.92, 53.98, 165.98 ppm; where V (mL) and C (mol/L) are the consumed volume and
FTIR (KBr) νmax/cm−1: 3317.18, 2939.11, 2867.62, 1621.52, concentration of KOH solution, respectively, W (g) is the
527.51, 1452.10, 1328.75, 1201.00, 998.74, 726.90, 600.28; weight of the sample.
ESIMS (+) m/z: 100.1, 102.1, 153.2, 289.3, 390.1.
1
To exclude the presence of IL in supernatant and ensure the
tion, additional treatment was performed for the supernatant
before acid value determination. That is, the supernatant was
diluted with dichloromethane, and the putative IL in the sample
was extracted three times with distilled water. Then the
Catalytic dehydration esterification of
ricinoleic acid and catalyst recycling
The dehydration esterification of ricinoleic acid was investigat- remaining organic phase was dried with Na2SO4 for 24 h fol-
ed using ILs as catalyst. In a typical run, 10 g (30 mmol) rici- lowed by filtration. After that, the filtrate was collected and the
noleic acid and 1 g (2.6 mmol) [HSO3-BDBU]H2PO4 were dichloromethane solvent was removed by vacuum evaporation
3
59