1
460
N.C. Singha et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 53 (1997) 1459–1462
3. Results and discussion
In concentrated solution, the N –H proton
shows high frequency shifts by 1.26 ppm com-
pared with that in dilute solution (Table 1) sug-
gesting intermolecular association through
hydrogen bonding. The ring protons experience
low frequency shifts in concentrated solution
compared to those in dilute solution. In dilute
solution (about 1 mg ml ), NOEs were observed
when the NH proton was saturated at H2 (3.3%)
and H4 (2.1%), while in the concentrated solution,
the NOEs were observed at H3% (1.0%), H6%
(2.3%) and H6 (0.6%) in addition to that at H2
(6.1%) and H4 (3.3%). To use the method de-
scribed by Bell and Saunders [6] to obtain infor-
mation on distances, it is necessary that the
important relaxation process should be dipolar. In
the case of (1), the aromatic protons will also
relax by spin rotation because of the rapid rota-
tion about the C –C bond. Hence distance infor-
mation could not be reliably obtained.
The chemical shift assignments for (1) and (2)
as verified by COSY experiments and literature
data for related systems are presented in Table 1
and the COSY spectrum of (2) in CDCl is shown
3
in Fig. 2. The spectra were also simulated in good
agreement with the experimental spectra.
Very recently Katritzky and Ghiviriga [4] utiliz-
ing the technique of SIMPLE have shown that
N-(2-pyridyl)acetamide (2NPA) and N-(2-
pyridyl)benzamide (2NPB) in CDCl3 and
−
1
(
CD ) CO exist in the following tautomeric-ro-
3 2
tamer form
R =CH 2NPA
3
R =C H 2NPB
6
5
In this rotamer, H3 experiences strong deshielding
l value 8.29 ppm for 2NPA) from the carbonyl
(
A dimer structure (Fig. 3) may be proposed for
the associated species of (1) in concentrated solu-
tion to account for the concentration dependence
of the H NMR spectra and the NOEs. The N –H
proton of one molecule is hydrogen bonded to the
group compared with 6.49 ppm in 2- aminopy-
ridine and 7.29 ppm in N,N-diacetyl-2-aminopy-
ridine [5]. It has been attributed to the coplanar
proximity of the carbonyl group. A comparison of
the chemical shifts of (1) and (2) with those of
1
2
-pyridyl nitrogen of another molecule. The dis-
2NPA and 2NPB shows that for N-(2-pyridyl)-
tance of N –H proton from H3% and H6% is respec-
CONH- part of (1) and (2), a planar trans struc-
ture could be suggested. Although it is possible to
conceive other planar conformations for example
by ‘isolated molecule’ MM1 calculations, because
of the low energy barrier for rotation over the
single bond, the chemical shift of H3% clearly
supports the conformation in which H3% is closer
to the CꢀO group (see Fig. 1). This was confirmed
by the l value of 7.0 ppm for H3 of N-(2-pyridyl),
N%-(aryl)ureas [1] where the intramolecular hydro-
gen bonding renders the H3 proton to move away
from the CꢀO group as shown below. However,
the 3-pyridyl ring in (1) can undergo free rotation
about OꢀC –C3 (pyridyl) bonds because of the
low energy barrier and the chemical shifts thus
refer to the average values [1].
tively 3.89 and 4.19 A, while the observed NOE is
1
.0 and 2.3% respectively. It suggests that as a
result of association, the N –H proton comes
closer to H6% when compared with its distance in
the monomer. In the dimer, the N –H proton of
one molecule is only 3.03 A away from H6% of the
other molecule. The distances were obtained from
molecular modeling of the dimer assuming for
simplicity linear intermolecular N –H –N hydro-
Fig. 1. N-(2-pyridinyl)-3-pyridinecarboxamide (1). N,N%-bis(2-
pyridinyl)3-pyridinecarboxamide (2).