Antitumor-Active Indole-Derived Allocolchicine Analogues
FULL PAPER
significant extent. We thus returned to the aryliodide 12 and
tried to react it with an appropriate indole-derived metalat-
ed reagent under Stille or Suzuki cross-coupling con-
Moreover, when we tried to convert 9 into the correspond-
ing acid chloride by treatment with oxalyl chloride, rapid de-
composition was observed, even at À788C. However, from
the reaction of 9 with (1-chloro-2-methylpropenyl)dimethyl-
[14a]
A
C
H
T
U
N
G
T
R
E
N
N
U
N
G
ditions.
the boronate 19b (Figure 3) were prepared from N-methyl-
-bromoindole (10) by following common protocols. Disap-
Accordingly, the organotin compound 19a and
[22]
amine (Ghosez reagent) in CH Cl , a clear solution con-
2
2
5
taining acid chloride 20 (as proven by sample aminolysis
pointingly, the Stille coupling of 12 with 19a could not be
with HNEt ) was obtained (Scheme 3).
2
achieved under a variety of conditions with different palladi-
In a first attempt to induce the projected Friedel–Crafts
um sources (Pd
A
C
H
T
U
N
G
T
R
E
N
N
U
N
G
[PPh ] , Pd (trans,trans-dibenzylideneace-
cyclization, we added ZnCl to a crude solution of 20 in
3
4
2
2
[18]
tone) , Pd(OAc) ), ligands (phosphine ligands, Ph As),
A
C
H
T
U
N
G
T
R
E
N
N
U
N
G
CH Cl at room temperature. However, the desired ketones
3
2
3
2
2
[19]
bases (K CO , Cs CO ), additives (CuI), and solvents (tol-
21a and 21b were obtained in only 5% yield (as a 4:1 mix-
ture), whereas the major products, formed in more than
50% combined yield (in a ratio of 1:3.5), turned out to be
compounds 22a and 22b, as unambiguously confirmed by
means of X-ray crystallography (Figure 4).
2
3
2
3
uene, MeCN, N-methylpyrrolidine). Only a side product re-
sulting from reductive dehalogenation of 12 was isolated,
which at least indicated the occurrence of the oxidative ad-
dition step. Encouraged by this observation, we finally tried
the Suzuki coupling between 12 and 1-methylindole-5-bor-
onic acid pinacol ester (19b). We were pleased to find that
the desired product 17 was formed in high yield when the
reaction was performed with Pd ACTHUNGTRNEUNG( OAc) (3 mol%) and Ph P
2 3
(
9 mol%) in the presence of Cs CO in toluene at 1108C
2 3
(
Scheme 2). In this reaction, the choice of base turned out
to be crucial, because no reaction was observed with K CO
2
3
instead of Cs CO . By following this protocol, the synthesis
2
3
of 17 could be easily performed on a multigram scale.
With compound 17 in our hands, the next goal was to
close ring B by means of Friedel–Crafts acylation. Although
a number of protocols employing esters as substrates in such
[20]
reactions have been reported, our initial attempts to di-
rectly cyclize ester 17 by treatment with a Lewis acid (AlCl3,
BF ·Et O, or ZnCl ) were not successful. Instead of the de-
3
2
2
sired products 21a/21b (Scheme 3), only complex product
mixtures were formed, presumably as a consequence of the
high reactivity and sensitivity of the electron-rich indole
system. The carboxylic acid 9, obtained from 17 by basic hy-
drolysis, also failed to give the desired cyclization products
Figure 4. Structures of compounds 22a and 22b in the crystalline state.
2
Sc
1a/21b upon treatment with either polyphosphoric acid or
ACHTUNGTRENNUNG( OTf) as the catalyst (Tf: trifluoromethanesulfonyl).
3
As compounds 22a and 22b probably result from reaction
of the indole part of 20 with unreacted Ghosez reagent in a
Vilsmeier/Haack type process (and concomitant hydrolysis
or aminolysis of the acid chloride function), we reduced the
amount of Ghosez reagent in the acid chloride forming step
to 1.1 equivalents and extended the reaction time to 12 h. In
[21]
addition, the resulting solution of 20 was diluted to a con-
À1
centration of 0.02 molL prior to addition of ZnCl at 08C
2
and further stirring for 2 h at room temperature. In this way,
ketones 21a and 21b were obtained (as a 4:1 mixture) in
4
0% yield on a gram scale. Other solvents (MeNO2,
PhNO ) and Lewis acids (AlCl , BF ·Et O, Sc(OTf) , Ti-
AHCTUNGTRENNUNG
2
3
3
2
3
AHCTUNGTRNNEG(U OiPr) , EtAlCl , Et AlCl) proved to be much less efficient.
4 2 2
Only ZnBr led to a comparable result. As we did not suc-
2
ceed in separating isomers 21a and 21b (either by column
chromatography or by preparative HPLC), we used the mix-
ture in the subsequent transformations.
Reductive amination with NaBH CN/NH OAc in
3
4
[23]
MeOH afforded rac-23a in 45% yield (56% with respect
to 21a) as the only amine formed under the reaction condi-
tions (Scheme 4). The interesting fact that ketone 21b did
not react to form the corresponding amine (even at elevated
Scheme 3. Synthesis of intermediates 21a and 21b. Reagents and condi-
tions: a) 1m LiOH (aq), THF/MeOH/H O, 50 8C; b) Ghosez reagent
1.1 equiv), CH Cl , 08C, 12 h; c) ZnCl (2 equiv), CH Cl , 08C to RT,
h. THF: tetrahydrofuran.
2
(
2
2
2
2
2
2
Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 00, 0 – 0
ꢁ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
&
3
&
ÞÞ
These are not the final page numbers!