organic compounds
entirely different supramolecular structure in (I) as compared
with (II), even though the structures of (I) and (II) are each
built from the combination of one NÐHÁ Á ÁN hydrogen bond
and one CÐHÁ Á ÁO hydrogen bond.
Data collection
Bruker±Nonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
Absorption correction: multi-scan
7314 measured re¯ections
2160 independent re¯ections
2047 re¯ections with I > 2ꢅ(I)
(
T
SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003)
min = 0.503, Tmax = 0.937
Rint = 0.038
Re®nement
2
2
R[F > 2ꢅ(F )] = 0.027
wR(F ) = 0.058
119 parameters
H-atom parameters constrained
2
Ê
� 3
Áꢆmax = 0.56 e A
S = 1.04
2160 re¯ections
Áꢆmin = � 0.49 e AÊ
� 3
Table 1
Selected bond angles ( ).
ꢀ
C6ÐC1ÐN1
C1ÐN1ÐC11
122.5 (3)
126.8 (2)
N1ÐC11ÐO1
122.6 (3)
Table 2
Hydrogen-bond geometry (A, ).
Ê
ꢀ
DÐHÁ Á ÁA
DÐH
HÁ Á ÁA
DÁ Á ÁA
DÐHÁ Á ÁA
Figure 2
A stereoview of part of the crystal structure of (I), showing a chain of
i
N1ÐH1Á Á ÁN2
C5ÐH5Á Á ÁO1
C6ÐH6Á Á ÁO1
0.86
0.95
0.95
2.54
2.38
2.24
3.309 (4)
3.214 (4)
2.815 (4)
149
147
118
ii
2
2
alternating R (12) and R (14) rings running parallel to [210]. For the sake
of clarity, H atoms not involved in the motifs shown have been omitted.
2
2
Symmetry codes: (i) � x 2; � y 1; � z 1; (ii) � x; � y 2; � z 1.
Experimental
Crystals of (I) are triclinic; the space group P1 was selected and
con®rmed by the subsequent structure analysis. All H atoms were
located in difference maps and then treated as riding atoms in
geometrically idealized positions, with CÐH distances of 0.95
Compound (I) was prepared by the acetylation of 2-amino-5-iodo-
benzonitrile, prepared as follows. K(ICl ) (Garden, Torres et al., 2001)
2
�
3
3 ml of a 2 mol dm solution in water) was added to a methanol
(
Ê
aromatic) or 0.98 A (methyl), NÐH distances of 0.86 A and
Ê
(
solution (15 ml) of 2-aminobenzonitrile (0.510 g, 5.0 mmol). The
reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature. After 2 h, the
product had precipitated and the benzonitrile substrate had been
completely consumed. The reaction mixture was diluted with water
Uiso(H) = kUeq(C,N), where k = 1.5 for the methyl group and k = 1.2
for all other H atoms.
Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1999); cell re®nement:
DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997) and COLLECT; data reduc-
tion: DENZO and COLLECT; program(s) used to solve structure:
OSCAIL (McArdle, 2003) and SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997);
program(s) used to re®ne structure: OSCAIL and SHELXL97
(
(
50 ml) and the product was collected by ®ltration and dried in air
yield 93%). Recrystallization from aqueous ethanol (97:3 v/v) gave
pale-brown plates [m.p. 356±357 K; literature (Harris et al., 1992)
3
7
1
1
2
58 K]. NMR (CDCl
3
): ꢀ
H
6.20 (2H, s, NH
2
), 6.62 (1H, d, J = 8.8 Hz),
: 74.9, 96.0,
(Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2003); soft-
.52 (1H, dd, J = 8.8 and 2.0 Hz), 7.65 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz); ꢀ
C
�
1
ware used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 and
PRPKAPPA (Ferguson, 1999).
16.8, 117.8, 139.7, 142.2, 151.2. IR (KBr disk, cm ): 3456, 3359, 2224,
643, 1552, 1483, 1402, 1155, 899, 820. The product (0.500 g,
.0 mmol) was treated with acetic anhydride (1 ml) and acetic acid
(2 ml). The reaction mixture was warmed gently for a few minutes
then hydrolyzed with water (20 ml). The product, (I), was collected
by ®ltration and recrystallized from aqueous ethanol (97:3 v/v) (yield
X-ray data were collected at the EPSRC National Crystal-
lography Service, University of Southampton, England. The
authors thank the staff for all their help and advice. SJG
thanks CNPq, and JLW thanks CNPq and FAPERJ for
3 H 3
79%, m.p. 449±451 K). NMR (CDCl ): ꢀ 2.27 (3H, s, CH ), 7.69 (1H,
br, s, NH), 7.85 (1H, dd, J = 10 and 1.9 Hz, H-5), 7.87 (1H, d, J =
®nancial support.
1
1
1
C
.9 Hz, H-3), 8.19 (1H, d, J = 10 Hz, H-6); ꢀ 24.4, 85.5, 103.2, 114.5,
22.4, 139.7, 139.9, 142.7, 168.2. IR (KBr disk, cm ): 3344, 3054, 2225,
689, 1577, 1516, 1383, 1369, 1295, 1258, 1182, 1122, 884, 842.
�
1
Supplementary data for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic
archives (Reference: SK3136). Services for accessing these data are
described at the back of the journal.
Crystal data
IN
= 286.07
Triclinic, P1
ꢀ
ꢃ = 90.926 (2)
V = 476.51 (3) A
Z = 2
C
M
9
H
7
2
O
Ê
3
r
References
Ê
a = 4.6657 (2) A
Mo Kꢁ radiation
Ê
b = 9.4172 (4) A
� 1
ꢄ = 3.32 mm
T = 120 (2) K
Arslan, B., Kazak, C., Kirilmis, C., Koca, M. & B uÈ y uÈ kg uÈ ng oÈ r, O. (2005). Acta
Cryst. E61, o1652±o1653.
Bernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 1555±1573.
Ê
c = 11.6841 (4) A
ꢀ
ꢁ
= 109.7520 (17)
ꢀ
0.24 Â 0.06 Â 0.02 mm
ꢂ = 98.598 (2)
ꢁ
Acta Cryst. (2007). C63, o408±o410
Garden et al.
C H
9 7
2
IN O
o409