4
90
J. Gong et al.
residue was washed with the mixed solution of water,
methanol and HCl solution for several times. Finally, the
resulting mixture was precipitated from DMSO and
methanol to give the desired product. Yield: 55 %. IR (KBr
pellet): 3425(m), 2931(m), 1714(m), 1599(s), 1473(w),
investigate the catalytic effectiveness of as prepared cata-
lyst 3 and 4. Fig. 1a, b shows the time-dependent UV–Vis
absorption spectra of oxidation of phenol and 2-CP,
respectively, assisted with 4-AAP and the formation pro-
cess of dyes in the presence of 3 and t-BuOOH. Obviously,
the absorbance peaks at 508 nm were observed for the
formation of conjugated products of antipyriloquinonei-
minium dyes, meanwhile, the color of solution changed
much rapidly from pale green to dark pink (see Video
data). When the catalytic reaction lasted for 10 min, the
absorbance intensity of dyes did not increase any more,
which meant the completion of catalytic oxidation. Dif-
ferent from TSFePc which has the Q bands of dimeric and
monmeric forms, only an intend monomer peak in Q band
of 3 was observed, which illuminated that the bulky phenyl
substituent groups on Pc ring prevent p–p interactions
between macrocycles of FePc complexes. Moreover, it is
notable that the intensity of Q band of 3 at 634 nm dis-
appeared when the absorbance of formed dyes achieved to
maximum. According to Nyokong’s investigation on liquid
phase oxidation of cyclohexane with peroxide catalyzed by
FePc complexes, absorbance peaks of FePc in Q band
could decrease gradually when peroxide was mixed with
FePc [15]. For our catalytic system, the disappearance of Q
band of 3 probably resulted from the decomposition of the
phthalocyanine ring, which was a result of the attack of the
-
1
1
265(w), 1238(s), 1161(m), 852(w), 557(w) cm . UV–Vis
-1
3
-1
(
DMSO), kmax/nm (loge, dm mol cm ): 333 (4.63),
5
6
1
71 (3.97), 629 (4.50). Anal. Calcd. for C H FeN O : C,
60 32 8 12
4.76; H, 2.90; N, 10.07. Found: C, 64.27; H, 2.70; N,
0.27.
The synthesis of 4 was similar to that of 3, except that
the precursor 2 was used instead of 1. The prepared crude
product of 4 was purified by flash column with the solution
of CH OH and CH Cl (v/v, 1:3) as the eluent. Yield:
3
2
2
1
1
6
2 %. IR (KBr pellet): 3431(m), 3093(w), 1722(s),
602(m), 1384(m), 1259(w), 1200(m), 1040(s), 818(w),
-
1
38(m), 596(w) cm . UV–Vis (DMSO), kmax/nm (loge,
3
-1
-1
dm mol cm ): 283 (4.62), 601 (3.94), 654 (4.53).
Anal. Calcd. for C H FeN O S : C, 55.89; H, 2.48; N,
6
8
36
12 16 4
1
1.50. Found: C, 55.51; H, 2.18; N, 11.79.
2
.4 Catalytic Oxidation Experiment
The typical catalytic oxidation of phenolic substrates with
-AAP by water-soluble iron phthalocyanine of 3 or 4 was
carried out in aqueous solution at room temperature using
4
•
tert-butyl hydroperoxide (t-BuOOH) as the oxidant. A
phthalocyanine ring by the BuO radical. It is noted that the
3
0 mL of deionized water, 10 mL of 4-AAP aqueous
homogeneous catalytic oxidation of DCP, 4-CP and 1-NP
could be completed just within 10 min in the presence of 3
and t-BuOOH (full UV–Vis spectra not shown). The cat-
alytic oxidation rate for these five substrates follows the
trend: DCP [ 2-CP [ phenol [ 4-CP [ 1-NP (Fig. 1c).
Interestingly, we found the situation of catalytic oxidation
of same phenolic substrates with t-BuOOH in the presence
of 4 was similar to that of 3 (Fig. 1d, e), except for longer
reaction time. (Fig. 1f) Based on the increase rate in dye
absorbance, we believe that catalyst 3 shows higher cata-
lytic activity than 4 under current conditions. The detailed
reasons for activity difference of catalyst 3 and 4 would be
discussed later.
-
solution (1.0 9 10 mol/L), 5 mL of phenolic solution
3
-
1.0 9 10 mol/L), and 5 mL of water-soluble iron
3
(
-
4
phthalocyanine stock solution (1.0 9 10 mol/L, dis-
solving 3 or 4 completely with the addition of proper
NaOH aqueous solution) were sequentially added into a
5
0 mL glass beaker. The catalytic reaction was initiated by
addition of 5 lL t-BuOOH solution following by contin-
uous magnetic stirring at 25 ꢁC. A portion of reaction
solution was collected at regular intervals and immediately
followed with the detection by a UV–Vis spectrophotom-
eter. HPLC was used to monitor the reaction process and
identify the productions in 2-CP system. The 2-CP and
4
-AAP were determined by spiking using standards via
comparison of retention times in HPLC profile.
3.2 Catalytic Process Monitoring by HPLC
Based on the analysis of UV–Vis absorbance spectra of
chromogenic reactions, we concluded that the production
of dye resulted from a fast oxidative coupling between
phenolic substrate and 4-AAP, and thus HPLC chromato-
gram was a suitable method to observe the transformation
process of these two kinds of substrate to dyes. The cata-
lytic oxidation system of 2-CP was selected for its fast
chromogenic identification. Fig. S1a and b of supplemen-
tary data presents HPLC chromatograms corresponding to
chromogenic reactions catalyzed by 3 and 4, respectively.
3
Results and Discussion
3
.1 Chromogenic Reaction of Five Phenolic Substrates
Catalyzed by 3 and 4
It has been reported that phenol and its various derivatives
could be efficiently oxidized by t-BuOOH in the presence
of water-soluble iron phthalocyanine catalyst [2, 9, 10, 13,
1
4], so we selected five kinds of phenolic substrates to
1
23