1
782
KONOVALOVA et al.
phenylpent-2-ene-1,4-dione (IIId). Yield 78%,
dependent thermal parameters, and the positions of the
NH and OH hydrogen atoms were refined indepen-
dently in isotropic approximation. A correction for
mp 132–134°C (decomp.; from EtOAc). IR spectrum,
–
1
8
ν, cm : 3261 br (OH, NH), 1664 (C =O), 1611 br
1
–1
(
C=O, assoc.). H NMR spectrum (DMSO-d ), δ, ppm:
absorption was applied empirically (μ = 0.092 mm ).
6
B: 1.56 s and 1.62 s (3H each, 3-Me), 1.97 s (3H, Me),
Final divergence factors: R = 0.0617, wR = 0.0887
1
2
2
5
2
1
3
.30 m (2H, 4-H, AB), 3.64 s (3H, OMe), 6.07 s (1H,
-H), 6.32 s (1H, CH), 6.59 s (1H, CH), 7.03 s (1H,
-H), 7.59–8.03 m (5H, Ph), 10.83 s (1H, NH),
6.09 br.s (1H, OH); C: 1.50 s and 1.60 s (3H each,
-Me), 1.94 s (3H, Me), 2.21 m (2H, 4-H, AB), 3.61 s
[for reflections with I > 2σ(I)] and R = 0.1947, wR =
0.1251 (for all reflections); goodness of fit S = 0.991.
1 2
The maximum and minimum electron density peaks
3
were 0.155 and –0.149 ē/Å , respectively. The set of
crystallographic data for compound IIIe was deposited
(
(
1
3H, OMe), 5.36 s (2H, 2-H), 6.03 s (1H, 5-H), 6.30 s
1H, CH), 6.58 s (1H, CH), 7.56–8.01 m (5H, Ph),
0.61 s (1H, NH). Found, %: C 70.62; H 6.20; N 3.31.
to the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre
(
entry no. CCDC 1 032 763) and is available at
www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
C H NO . Calculated, %: C 70.74; H 6.18; N 3.44.
2
4
25
5
This study was performed under financial support
by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project
nos. 12-03-00146, 12-03-00696), by the Ministry of
Education and Science of the Russian Federation, and
by the Ministry of Education of Perm Krai (Interna-
tional Research Teams competition).
(
2Z,5Z)-3-Hydroxy-5-(6,9-dimethoxy-3,3-di-
methyl-8-oxo-2-azaspiro[4.5]deca-6,9-dien-
-ylidene)-1-phenylpent-2-ene-1,4-dione (IIIe).
Yield 80%, mp 183–184°C (decomp.; from EtOAc).
1
–
1
8
IR spectrum, ν, cm : 3207 br (OH, NH), 1661 (C =O),
1
1
604 br (C=O, assoc.). H NMR spectrum (CDCl ), δ,
3
ppm: B: 1.53 s and 1.55 s (3H each, 3-Me), 2.32 m (2H,
-H, AB), 3.69 s and 3.76 s (3H each, OMe), 5.73 s
REFERENCES
4
(
(
1
3
1H, 5-H), 7.05 s (1H, 2-H), 7.26 s (1H, CH), 7.36 s
1H, CH), 7.44–7.99 m (5H, Ph), 10.75 s (1H, NH),
5.66 br.s (1H, OH); C: 1.48 s and 1.50 s (3H each,
-Me), 2.29 m (2H, 4-H, AB), 3.64 s and 3.72 s (3H
1. Andreichikov, Yu.S., Gein, V.L., Zalesov, V.V., Kozlov,
A.P., Kollents, G., Maslivets, A.N., Pimenova, E.V., and
Shurov, S.N., Khimiya pyatichlennykh 2,3-dioksogetero-
tsiklov (Chemistry of Five-Membered 2,3-Dioxo
Heterocycles), Perm: Perm. Gos. Univ., 1994, p. 5.
each, OMe), 5.42 s (2H, 2-H), 5.68 s (1H, 5-H), 7.21 s
1H, CH), 7.31 s (1H, CH), 7.42–7.96 m (5H, Ph),
0.42 s (1H, NH). Found, %: C 67.95; H 6.15; N 3.29.
C H NO . Calculated, %: C 68.07; H 5.95; N 3.31.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
. Nekrasov, D.D. and Shurov, S.N., Chem. Heterocycl.
Compd., 2005, vol. 41, no. 10, p. 1245.
. Novikov, A.A., Vostrov, E.S., and Maslivets, A.N., Russ.
J. Org. Chem., 2005, vol. 41, p. 1234.
. Andreichikov, Yu.S., Voronova, L.A., and Milyu-
tin, A.V., Zh. Org. Khim., 1979, vol. 15, p. 847.
. Khalturina, V.V., Shklyaev, Yu.V., Aliev, Z.G., and Mas-
livets, A.N., Russ. J. Org. Chem., 2009, vol. 45, p. 728.
. Khalturina, V.V., Shurov, S.N., and Maslivets, A.N.,
Russ. J. Org. Chem., 2009, vol. 45, p. 953.
. Konovalova, V.V., Shklyaev, Yu.V., and Maslivets, A.N.,
Russ. J. Org. Chem., 2011, vol. 47, p. 1119.
. Nifontov, Yu.V., Glushkov, V.A., and Shklyaev, Yu.V.,
Russ. Chem. Bull., Int. Ed., 2003, vol. 52, no.2, p. 437.
. Rozhkova, Yu.S., Khmelevskaya, K.A., Shklyaev, Yu.V.,
(
1
2
4
25
6
X-Ray analysis of compound IIIe. The X-ray
diffraction data for compound IIIe were acquired on
an Xcalibur E automatic diffractometer equipped with
a CCD detector according to standard procedure
[
ω-scanning through a step of 1°; MoK irradiation,
α
λ 0.71073 Å; 295(2) K] [11]. The data were obtained
from a 0.25×0.20×0.15-mm fragment of a yellow pris-
matic single crystal. Monoclinic crystal system, space
group P2 /c; C H NO ; unit cell parameters: a =
1
9
cm . Total of 9774 reflection intensities were meas-
ured in the range –16 < h < 20, –15 < k < 16, –12 < l <
1
1
24 25
6
6.534(2), b = 13.514(2), c = 9.9331(12) Å; β =
3
6.761(13)°; V = 2204.1(6) Å ; Z = 4; d = 1.276 g×
calc
–
3
Ezhikova, M.A., and Kodess, M.I., Russ. J. Org. Chem.,
2
012, vol. 48, p. 69.
2; 4506 reflections were independent (R = 0.0791),
int
1
0. Glushkov, V.A., Stryapunina, O.G., Gorbunov, A.A.,
Maiorova, O.A., Slepukhin, P.A., Ryabukhina, S.Ya.,
Khorosheva, E.V., Sokol, V.I., and Shklyaev, Yu.V.,
Tetrahedron, 2010, vol. 66, p. 721.
and 1625 reflections were characterized by I > 2σ(I);
completeness 99.9% for the range 2.84 < Θ < 26.00.
The structure was solved using SHELXS-97 and was
2
refined using SHELXL-97 [12] against F in aniso-
11. CrysAlisPro, Version 1.171.36.32 (release 02-08-2013
tropic approximation for non-hydrogen atoms. The
positions of hydrogen atoms were refined according to
the riding model in isotropic approximation with
CrysAlis171.NET), Agilent Technologies.
12. Sheldrick, G.M., Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A, 2008,
vol. 64, p. 112.
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY Vol. 50 No. 12 2014