(
a ratio suitable for liquid fuel formation by the Fischer–Tro
¨
psch
efficiency of 32%. In the case of water reduction, the thermo-
dynamic potential of proton reduction to hydrogen in aceto-
nitrile with water as the proton source is not available in the
literature. Therefore, the thermodynamic potential (ꢁ1.46 V
process) the Re complex concentration was decreased from 5 mM
to 0.5 mM. Fig. 3a shows the effect of water in an illuminated
p-Si/Re(bipy-tBu)(CO) Cl junction system under an atmosphere
3
+
of CO . Initial addition of a small amount of water lowers the
2
vs. Fc/Fc ) of proton reduction with acetic acid (weak acid) as
catalytic current density at the 2nd reduction of Re(bipy-tBu)-
the proton source in acetonitrile was used in the conversion
efficiency calculation as the thermodynamic potential for water
(
CO)
homogeneous CO
sated for by heterogeneous water reduction at illuminated p-Si so
that the catalytic current density recovers. Co-generation of H
and CO was confirmed by simultaneous detection in a split
column gas chromatograph (GC). The H to CO ratio could then
be calculated quantitatively from the number of moles of H and
3
Cl. At higher concentrations of water, the decrease in
20
2
reduction by Re(bipy-tBu)(CO) Cl is compen-
3
2
reduction. Therefore, the overpotential for H generation is
0.44 V. The co-generation process has a Faradaic efficiency of
nearly 100%, so IR loss is zero in this case. With a monochromatic
2
ꢁ
2
light (661 nm) illumination intensity of 95 mW cm on the
ꢁ2
2
photocathode surface and a catalytic current density of 5.6 mA cm ,
2
the total light-to-chemical energy conversion efficiency for the
cathodic half cell reaction calculated by eqn (1) is 4.6%.
Here we have shown the efficient co-generation of CO and H2
CO produced by comparing GC peak areas with calibration
curves. Fig. 3b shows consistent co-generation of H and CO
2
with a ratio near 2 : 1 during bulk electrolysis experiments run at a
+
from CO2 and H O in a mixed homogeneous/heterogeneous
2
potential of ꢁ1900 mV vs. Fc/Fc .
system that allows for tunability in product distribution. We are
Control experiments were conducted with glassy carbon as
the working electrode under the same conditions as those
able to tune the H
and variation of Re(bipy-tBu)(CO)
knowledge this is the first example of co-generation of this type
and may provide for opportunities to co-generate H and CO in
2
/CO ratio from 0 to 2 : 1 by addition of water
3
Cl concentration. To our
described above and H
observed. This experiment confirms the role of p-Si as the
heterogeneous catalyst for H production from water and the
Cl as the only CO reduction
2
/CO ratios of only 1 : 7 (or 0.14) were
2
2
the future at lower overpotential and higher overall light-to-
chemical energy conversion efficiency. Further studies are ongoing
in our laboratory to further optimize the system through catalyst
and surface optimization.
role of Re(bipy-tBu)(CO)
catalyst.
3
2
The gas chromatographs of CO and H are shown in Fig. S3
2
and S4 (ESIz). As the amount of charge passed during bulk
electrolysis is increased from 0 to 13.7 C, the total area of both
Notes and references
the CO and H peaks increased linearly. Fig. S5a (ESIz) shows
2
1
2
J. R. Rostrup-Nielsen, Catal. Today, 2000, 63, 159–164.
J. R. Rostrup-Nielsen, Catal. Today, 2002, 71, 243–247.
that the increase in charge passed is linear with time during
bulk electrolysis, indicating little to no degradation of the
catalysts during the course of the experiment. Dividing the slope
of the curve in Fig. S5a (ESIz) by the area of the electrode gives a
3 A. J. V. Underwood, Ind. Eng. Chem., 1940, 32, 449–454.
4
5
6
7
E. E. Benson, C. P. Kubiak, A. J. Sathrum and J. M. Smieja,
Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 89–99.
A. J. Morris, G. J. Meyer and E. Fujita, Acc. Chem. Res., 2009, 42,
1983–1994.
S. C. Roy, O. K. Varghese, M. Paulose and C. A. Grimes, ACS
Nano, 2010, 4, 1259–1278.
F. Gloaguen and T. B. Rauchfuss, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38,
100–108.
ꢁ
2
current density for CO and H co-generation of 5.6 mA cm .
2
There is a linear relationship between the total number of moles
of electrons passed during bulk electrolysis and the total number
of moles of gas (H + CO) with a slope 1.94 (indicative of both
2
CO and water reduction being two electron processes) as shown
2
8 M. Rakowski Dubois and D. L. Dubois, Acc. Chem. Res., 2009,
2, 1974–1982.
C. d. Tard and C. J. Pickett, Chem. Rev., 2009, 109, 2245–2274.
4
in Fig. S5b (ESIz). Based on Fig. S5b, the Faradaic efficiency for
9
co-generation of H and CO under these conditions is 102 ꢀ 5%.
2
1
0 C. Delacourt, P. L. Ridgway, J. B. Kerr and J. Newman,
J. Electrochem. Soc., 2008, 155, B42–B49.
In the three electrode set-up for the cathodic half reaction
only, the total light-to-chemical energy conversion efficiency
11 A. Stamatiou, P. G. Loutzenhiser and A. Steinfeld, Chem. Mater.,
2009, 22, 851–859.
1
8,19
2
for CO and water photoreduction is given by:
1
2 A. Stamatiou, P. G. Loutzenhiser and A. Steinfeld, Energy Fuels,
2010, 24, 2716–2722.
13 J. M. Smieja and C. P. Kubiak, Inorg. Chem., 2010, 49, 9283–9289.
ꢂ
ꢃ
nꢀ
ꢁ
o
P
DHi
Zi
Jm
xi
ꢁ Vi;op
ꢁ fIR lossg
i
1
4 B. Kumar, J. M. Smieja and C. P. Kubiak, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010,
114, 14220–14223.
Z ¼
ð1Þ
Ihv
1
5 M. G. Bradley and T. Tysak, J. Electroanal. Chem., 1982, 135,
153–157.
where Jm = catalytic current density, x = Faradaic efficiency,
i
DH
i
= heat of combustion, Z
i
= number of electrons involved
16 M. G. Bradley, T. Tysak, D. J. Graves and N. A. Viachiopoulos,
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1983, 349–350.
in the reduction, Vi,op = overpotential, IR loss = loss
associated with non-Faradaic processes, and Ihn = incoming
light intensity (power density). In the above approach, fuels
1
7 Y. Tomita, S. Teruya, O. Koga and Y. Hori, J. Electrochem. Soc.,
000, 147, 4164–4167.
18 M. Zafrir, M. Ulman, Y. Zuckerman and M. Halmann,
2
produced as a result of CO
2
and water reduction are considered
for CO and H are
.93 eV coulomb and 2.96 eV coulomb , respectively, and the
overpotential for CO generation is 1.25 V with a Faradaic
J. Electroanal. Chem., 1983, 159, 373–389.
9 E. E. Barton, D. M. Rampulla and A. B. Bocarsly, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2008, 130, 6342–6344.
0 G. A. N. Felton, R. S. Glass, D. L. Lichtenberger and D. H. Evans,
Inorg. Chem., 2006, 45, 9181–9184.
1
2
mainly as thermal combustion fuels. The DH
i
2
ꢁ
1
ꢁ1
2
2
74 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 272–274
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012