L.Z. Ouyang et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 580 (2013) S317–S319
S319
Mg3LaH9 was quickest among Mg3LaH3, Mg3LaH6 and Mg3LaH9.
As the hydrogenation degree rose, the content of MgH2 increased
and Mg content decreased. The hydrolysis performance of MgH2
could be significantly accelerated by LaH3 but that of Mg was af-
fected by LaH3 limitedly. For the fully hydrogenated Mg3LaH9 sam-
ple, the coexisted LaH3 and MgH2 promoted each other which
resulted in complete hydrolysis. Hence, the hydrolysis rate and
yield of Mg3LaHx hydride could be controlled through adjusting
the ratio of LaH3 to Mg or MgH2. Compared to the hydrogenated
LaMg12 [10], the fully hydrogenated Mg3La had the higher hydroly-
sis rate due to the higher ratio of LaH3 to MgH2. So Choosing the
hydride with suitable ratio of La:Mg is also important to get the op-
tional hydrolysis rate for commercial application.
4. Conclusion
Control the amount of hydrogen involved the reactions can ob-
tain different hydrogenated degree Mg3La alloys. La first adsorbed
hydrogen and transformed into LaH3, after that Mg element re-
acted with hydrogen and transformed into MgH2. The hydrolysis
performance of MgH2 could be significantly accelerated by LaH3
but Mg was affected by LaH3 limitedly. The fully hydrogenated
Mg3La alloy can generate 873.24 ml gꢀ1 H2 in 66 min (7.80 wt.%).
The hydrolysis rate and yield of Mg3La hydride could be controlla-
ble through adjusting the ratio of LaH3 to Mg or MgH2.
Fig. 3. The sizes and strains of LaH3, MgH2 and Mg in Mg3LaH3 (X = 3), Mg3LaH6
(X = 6) and Mg3LaH9 (X = 9), respectively. The sizes/strains of LaH3 in Mg3LaH3,
Mg3LaH6, and Mg3LaH9 are 39 nm/0.23%, 60 nm/0.23% and 43 nm/0.32%, respec-
tively. The sizes/strains of MgH2 in Mg3LaH6 and Mg3LaH9 are 52 nm/0.14% and
46 nm/0.17%, respectively. And the sizes/strains of Mg in Mg3LaH3 and Mg3LaH6 are
51 nm/0.18% and 48 nm/0.21%, respectively.
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by the Ministry of Science
and Technology of China (No. 2010CB631302), the National Natu-
ral Science Foundation of China (Nos. U1201241, 51271078 and
50925102) and KLGHEI(KLB11003).
References
[1] D.M.F. Santos, C.A.C. Sequeira, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 15 (2011) 3980–
4001.
[2] S.S. Muir, X.D. Yao, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 36 (2011) 5983–5997.
[3] Y.F. Liu, F.H. Wang, Y.H. Cao, M.X. Gao, H.G. Pan, Q.D. Wang, Energy Environ.
Sci. 3 (2010) 645–653.
[4] T. Hiraki, S. Hiroi, T. Akashi, N. Okinaka, T. Akiyama, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 37
(2012) 12114–12119.
[5] V. Rosenband, A. Gany, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 35 (2010) 10898–10904.
[6] M. Uda, H. Okuyama, T.S. Suzuki, Y. Sakka, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 13 (2012).
[7] S. Wang, L.X. Sun, F. Xu, C.L. Jiao, J. Zhang, H.Y. Zhou, F.L. Huang, Int. J. Hydrogen
Energy 37 (2012) 6771–6775.
[8] Y. Kojima, K.I. Suzuki, Y. Kawai, J. Mater. Sci. 39 (2004) 2227–2229.
[9] S. Hiroi, S. Hosokai, T. Akiyama, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 36 (2011) 1442–1447.
[10] L.Z. Ouyang, J.M. Huang, C.J. Fang, Q.A. Zhang, D.L. Sun, M. Zhu, Int. J. Hydrogen
Energy 37 (2012) 12358–12364.
[11] U.B. Demirci, O. Akdim, P. Miele, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 34 (2009) 2638–2645.
[12] Q. Xu, M. Chandra, J. Alloy Comp. 446–447 (2007) 729–732.
[13] B. Weng, Z. Wu, Z. Li, H. Yang, H. Leng, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 36 (2011)
10870–10876.
[14] M.H. Grosjean, M. Zidoune, L. Roué, J.Y. Huot, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 31 (2006)
109–119.
[15] L.Z. Ouyang, Y.J. Wen, Y.J. Xu, X.S. Yang, L.X. Sun, M. Zhu, Int. J. Hydrogen
Energy 35 (2010) 8161–8165.
[16] S.D. Kushch, N.S. Kuyunko, R.S. Nazarov, B.P. Tarasov, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
36 (2011) 1321–1325.
[17] M.H. Grosjean, M. Zidoune, L. Roue, J.Y. Huot, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 31 (2006)
109–119.
[18] J.Y. Uan, C.Y. Cho, K.T. Liu, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 32 (2007) 2337–2343.
[19] M.H. Grosjean, M. Zidoune, J.Y. Huot, L. Roue, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 31 (2006)
1159–1163.
Fig. 4. The XRD patterns of the hydrolysis production of (a) Mg3LaH3, (b) Mg3LaH6
and (c) Mg3LaH9.
and Mg phases still existed, which indicated that the Mg3LaH3 only
partially hydrolyzed. As we know, pure LaH3 can react with water
completely. However, only partial LaH3 could react with water in
Mg3LaH3 indicated that the coexisted Mg could partially prevent
the LaH3 from being hydrolyzed in water. It can be also indicated
that hydrolysis performance of Mg was affected limitedly by
LaH3. For the hydrolysis of Mg3LaH6, the newly appeared peaks
in the XRD pattern could also be indexed as Mg(OH)2 and La(OH)3
phases. All the LaH3, MgH2 and Mg phases in Mg3LaH6 had disap-
peared. Likewise, both LaH3 and MgH2 phases disappeared and
the newly peaks can be attributed as Mg(OH)2 and La(OH)3 phases
after the hydrolysis of Mg3LaH9 as shown in Fig. 4c. In the case of
hydrolysis of Mg3LaH6 and Mg3LaH9, it can be illuminated that
LaH3 can significantly accelerate the hydrolysis of MgH2.
[20] J. Huot, G. Liang, R. Schulz, J. Alloy Comp. 353 (2003) L12–L15.
[21] L.Z. Ouyang, Y.J. Xu, H.W. Dong, L.X. Sun, M. Zhu, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 34
(2009) 9671–9676.
Based on that the LaH3 content was the same but the MgH2 and
Mg were various in different hydrides, the hydrolysis rate of