G Model
CCLET 4041 No. of Pages 7
2
D. Maraii et al. / Chinese Chemical Letters xxx (2017) xxx–xxx
(3)Å3. The asymmetric unit of the title compound is depicted in
Fig.1 and shows the presence of an anionic entity formed by square
pyramid [TeCl5]ꢁ entities, two isolated Clꢁ and three independent
3-nirtoanilinium [C6H7N2O2]+.
Five chlorine atoms surround the tellurium atom in the anionic
species and form a square-based pyramidal coordination. Indeed,
the environment in the tellurium atom is characterized by five
TeꢁꢁCl bonds. The Te-Cl distances are between 2.327(2) Å and
2.642(2) Å. ClꢁꢁTeꢁꢁCl bond angles fall in the range of 89.55(9)ꢂ–
178.28(8)ꢂ. The selected bonds and angles are listed in Table S1 in
Supporting information. The projection of the atomic arrangement
of [C6H7N2O2]3TeCl5 2Cl compound in the (ac) plane is shown in
ꢀ
Fig. S1 in Supporting information. The structure is parallel
inorganic layers alternated by organic planes. Both planes are
parallel to the (a b) one. The C-N bond lengths vary from 1.456(9) Å
to 1.490(2) Å. CꢁꢁC bond lengths vary from 1.353(15) Å to 1.402
(17) Å and angles CꢁꢁCꢁꢁC, NꢁꢁCꢁꢁC, CꢁꢁNꢁꢁO are between 114.7
(1)ꢂ and 126.9(1)ꢂ. In the title compound, the entire ring is planar
and is built up by the atoms (C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6), (C7, C8, C9, C10,
C11, C12), (C13, C14, C15, C16, C17, C18).
Fig. 2. Dotted lines: the intermolecular hydrogen bonds contacts of the title
compound.
decomposition process. Three decomposition stages can be clearly
distinguished. The first of which is endothermic and appears as a
shoulder in the DTG signal. As for the second stage, it is located
around 200 ꢂC and involves the larger mass loss. This stage is an
exothermic process. Concerning the third stage, it is located
approximately between 250 ꢂC and 300 ꢂC and is also an
exothermic process. After the decomposition, the mass continues
to decrease steadily because the final decomposition product is not
stable. Indeed, the mass decreases up to 900 ꢂC where no solid
product is left.
In the [(C6H7N2O2)3TeCl5 2Cl], the organic species interact with
ꢀ
the inorganic group via NꢁꢁHꢀ ꢀ ꢀCl hydrogen bonds, as shown in
Table S2 and in Fig. 2. Actually, there are six strong (3.089(7) and
3.184(7) Å) and four weak (3.279(6) and 3.581(7) Å) NꢁꢁHꢀ ꢀ ꢀCl
hydrogen bonds [17]. The intermolecular hydrogen bonding
contacts CꢁꢁHꢀ ꢀ ꢀCl provide a linkage between the (C6H7N2O2)+
entities and the [TeCl5]ꢁ anions (3.585(8)–3.646(9) Å).
2.2. Thermal analysis
The evolution of the mass (TG signal) when the sample is
submitted to a constant temperature rise is shown in Fig. 3. The
sample is stable up to 130 ꢂC. The decomposition is triggered by an
endothermic process. This endothermic process is not a melting or
evaporation because it is thermally activated. The process shifts to
higher temperature when the heating rate is increased [18].
Besides, the analysis of the morphology of the solid sample at
150 ꢂC does not reveal any melting process.
In Fig. 3.b, we have plotted the evolution of the time derivative
of the TG signal (DTG) together with the DSC signal. Both
parameters are directly related to the transformation rate and
they allow an easier identification of the different stages of the
2.3. Kinetic analysis
In this section we perform a kinetic analysis to determine the
activation energy. Isoconversional methods allow the determina-
tion of the kinetic parameters without assuming any particular
reaction mechanism, i.e., they are model-free. They are based on
the determination of one or more of the system parameters
(temperature, transformation rate, and etc.) at which the same
degree of transformation,
a, has been reached for the measure-
ments performed at different constant temperatures (isothermal)
or different heating rates (non-isothermal). In general, non-
isothermal experiments are preferred [19] because they are easier
and faster to perform and can explore a wider temperature range.
Isoconversional methods rely on the hypothesis that at a given
a,
the transformation rate is only a function of temperature [19,20].
ꢀ
ꢁ
dlnðd
a
dTꢁ1
=dtÞ
E
a
R
¼ ꢁ
ð1Þ
a
Where the subscript
the gas constant and E
Eq. (1) results in a transformation governed by a single mechanism
a
indicates the degree of transformation, R is
a
is the activation energy. The integration of
where the rate constant, k (T) = A exp(ꢁE /RT), depends on
a
[21]:
a
a
a
ꢀ
ꢁ
da
E
a
¼ A exp ꢁ
fðaÞ
ð2Þ
a
dt
RT
A variation of E with
a is usually related to the occurrence of
a
complex transformations where several mechanisms are involved
(such as heterogeneous transformations, multi-step reactions, or
transformations depending on parameters other than
a and T)
[22–25]. In this context, Eq. (1) is an approximate relationship and
E
must be interpreted in terms of apparent activation energy.
In Fig. 4, we have plotted the evolution of the transformation
a
which was obtained directly from the TG analysis (Fig. 3). To
calculate the degree of the transformation, we have assumed that
Fig. 1. The asymmetric unit of [C6H7N2O2]3TeCl5 2Cl showing the atom-labeling
scheme.
ꢀ
a
Please cite this article in press as: D. Maraii, et al., Synthesis, structural study, thermal, optical properties and characterization of the new
ꢀ