10.1002/ejic.201800120
European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
FULL PAPER
4H, m-CH), 3.72 (s, 6H, O-CH3), 2.89 and 2.73 (2 s, 15H, CH3 (DMF)),
2.15 (s, 6H, CH3). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6), δ (ppm): 162.77 (C=S),
159.37 (C=N), 155.96 (C–O), 134.30 (o-C), 122.24 (m-C), 114.23 (p-C),
55.63 (O–CH3), 15.01 (C–CH3).
set. Vertical electronic transitions were calculated using time-dependent
DFT (TD-DFT)[46-48] within the Tamm–Dancoff approximation.[49,50] To
increase computational efficiency, the RI approximation[51] was used in
calculating the Coulomb term, and at least 30 excited states were
calculated in each case. For each transition, difference density plots were
generated using the orca plot utility program and were visualized with the
Chemcraft program.
X-ray crystallography
Crystallographic data for [PdL]•2.5DMF (CCDC-1548060) can be
obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data
Acknowledgements
PdL were measured on
a Rigaku Oxford Diffraction SuperNova
diffractometer at 223K at the CuKα radiation (λ=1.54184 Å). Data
collection reduction and multiscan ABSPACK correction were performed
with CrysAlisPro (Rigaku Oxford Diffraction). The structures were solved
by direct methods with SHELXS[31] and SHELXL[31] was used for full
matrix least squares refinement. PdL crystallized with two independent
molecules in the asymmetric unit and five DMF solvent molecules. All H-
atoms were found experimentally and were refined with riding
coordinates to their parent atoms and their Uiso parameters constraint to
1.5Ueq (parent atoms) for the methyls and to 1.2Ueq (parent atom) for
the other carbons and amines.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of this work by
the CNRS and the Academy of Sciences of Moldova (Bilateral
agreement EDC25722 2013-2014), the COST Actions CM1305
ECOSTBio (Explicit Control Over Spin-States in Technology and
Biochemistry) and CM1202 Perspect-H2O (Supramolecular
photocatalytic water splitting). The authors would like to thank
Jennifer Fize and Dr. Vincent Artero for assistance in the
electrocatalytic measurements and fruitful discussions.
Keywords: palladium • redox-active ligand • quantum chemistry
Electrochemistry
• electrocatalyst • hydrogen evolution reaction
Cyclic voltammetry experiments were performed using a BioLogic SP300
potentiostat and a three-electrode set-up consisting of a glassy carbon
working electrode, a platinum wire counter electrode and an Ag/AgCl
(KCl 3M) reference electrode. Ferrocene was used as an internal
[1]
[2]
A. Borgschulte, Front. Energy Res. 2016, 4, 282.
T. R. Simmons, G. Berggren, M. Bacchi, M. Fontecave, V. Artero,
Coord. Chem. Rev. 2014, 270 –271, 127-150.
S. Ogo, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2017, 334, 43-53.
P. Du, R. Eisenberg, Energy Environ. Sci., 2012, 5, 6012-6021.
J. R. McKone, S. C. Marinescu, B. S. Brunschwig,J. R. Winkler, H. B.
Gray, Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 865-878.
standard with E0(Fc+/Fc)
= 0.53 V vs. Ag/AgCl. All studies were
[3]
[4]
[5]
performed in deoxygenated DMF containing NBu4PF6 (0.1 M) as
supporting electrolyte. Controlled potential electrolysis experiments were
carried out in two-compartment cell. The volume of solution (DMF, 0.1 M
NBu4PF6) used in the working compartment of the cell was 8 ml. The
working electrode used was a pool of mercury, separated from the coiled
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
D. Z. Zee, T. Chantarojsiri, J. R. Long, C. J. Chang, Acc Chem Res
2015, 48, 2027-2036.
platinum wire counter electrode by
a porous frit. Bulk electrolysis
R. Pal, J. A. Laureanti, T. L. Groy, A. K. Jones, R. J. Trovitch, Chem.
Commun. 2016, 52, 11555-11558.
solutions were purged with N2 gas for at least 20 min prior to electrolysis
and stirred throughout bulk electrolysis experiment. During the
experiment, the cell was continuously purged with nitrogen (5 mL.min-1)
and the output gas was analyzed at two-minute intervals in a Perkin
Elmer Clarus 500 gas chromatographer using a previously described
setup.[32]
N. Coutard, N. Kaeffer, V. Artero; Chem. Commun., 2016, 52, 13728-
13748.
O. T. Holton and J. W. Stevenson, Platinum Met. Rev. 2013, 57, 259-
271.
[10] A. Volbeda, M.H. Charon, C. Piras, E.C. Hatchikian, M. Frey and J.C.
Fontecilla-Camps, Nature, 1995, 373, 580-587.
[11] Y. Nicolet, C. Piras, P. Legrand, E.C. Hatchikian and J.C. Fontecilla-
Camps, Structure Fold Des. 1999, 7, 13-23.
DFT calculations
[12] D. L. DuBois, Inorg. Chem., 2014, 53, 3935-3960.
[13] A. D. Wilson, R. H. Newell, M. J. McNevin, J. T. Muckerman, M. R.
DuBois, D. L. DuBois, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 358-366.
[14] E. S. Wiedner, A. M. Appel, D. L. DuBois, R. M. Bullock, Inorg. Chem.
2013, 52, 14391-14403.
All theoretical calculations were performed with the ORCA program
package.[33] Full geometry optimizations were undertaken for all
complexes using the GGA functional BP86[34-36] in combination with the
TZV/P[37] basis set for all atoms, and by taking advantage of the
resolution of the identity (RI) approximation in the Split-RI-J variant[38]
with the appropriate Coulomb fitting sets[39] Increased integration grids
(Grid4 in ORCA convention) and tight SCF convergence criteria were
used. Electronic structures and Molecular Orbital diagrams were
obtained from single-point calculations using the hybrid functional
B3LYP[40,41] together with the TZV/P basis set. Increased integration grids
(Grid4 and GridX4 in ORCA convention) and tight SCF convergence
criteria were used in the calculations. For according to the experimental
conditions solvent effects were accounted and we used the DMF solvent
(ε = 38) within the framework of the conductor-like screening (COSMO)
dielectric continuum approach.[42] The relative energies were computed
from the gas-phase optimized structures as a sum of electronic energy,
solvation and thermal corrections to the free energy. Single-point Broken-
Symmetry DFT calculations were performed using the same
functional/basis as employed before. All spin configurations for the
broken-symmetry calculations were generated with the “FlipSpin” feature
of ORCA.[43,44] Spin density plots as well as molecular orbitals were
generated using the orca plot utility program and were visualized with the
Chemcraft program.[45] Optical properties were predicted from additional
single-point calculations using the B3LYP functional and the TZV/P basis
[15] F. Gloaguen and T. B. Rauchfuss, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 100-108.
[16] A. Z. Haddad, B. D. Garabato, P. M. Kozlowski, R. M. Buchanan, C. A.
Grapperhaus, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 7844-7847.
[17] V. Artero, M. Chavarot-Kerlidou, M. Fontecave, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,
2011, 50, 7238-7266.
[18] J. L. Dempsey, B. S. Brunschwig, J. R. Winkler, H. B. Gray, Acc.
Chem.Res. 2009, 42, 1995-2004.
[19] N. Kaeffer, M. Chavarot-Kerlidou, V. Artero, Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48,
1286-1295.
[20] P. Zhang, M. Wang, Y. Yang, T. Yao, L. Sun, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,
2014, 53, 13803-13807.
[21] A. Z. Haddad, S. P. Cronin, R. M. Buchanan, C. A. Grapperhaus, Inorg.
Chem., 2017, 56, 11254-11265.
[22] D. Sirbu, C. Turta, E.A. Gibson, A.C. Benniston, Dalton Trans., 2015,
44, 14646-14655.
[23] C.J. Curtis, A. Miedaner, R. Ciancanelli, W.W. Ellis, B.C. Noll, M. R.
DuBois, D.L. DuBois, Inorg. Chem., 2003, 42, 216-227.
[24] M. J. M. Campbell, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1975, 15, 279-319.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.