092904-2
Barua et al.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 092904 ͑2006͒
FIG. 2. High resolution XP scans for the Al 2p peaks for two aluminum
based films deposited via cyclic deposition. Both films were deposited at
120 °C, and 1600 psi. Film labeled H2O2 was deposited form Al͑acac͒3 and
FIG. 3. Thickness data determined from ellipsometry for Al-based films
deposited from Al͑hfac͒3 –H2O2 at 100 °C and ϳ2000 psi on native oxide
of Si͑100͒ for different precursor exposure times and sample orientations.
Samples were oriented inside the reaction cell such that the deposition sur-
face ͓polished surface of Si͑100͔͒ faced directly to the precursor inlet ͑b͒,
or the deposition surface faced opposite to the precursor inlet ͑sample
flipped by 180° from previous orientation͒ ͑, ᭡͒.
hydrogen peroxide, while film TBA was deposited from Al͑acac͒ and tert-
3
butyl peracetate.
The experiments were carried out in A/B cycles similar
to an atomic layer deposition process.5 For each cycle, a set
volume ͑corresponding to ϳ0.2 g͒ of precursor/sc CO2 solu-
tion ͑A͒ was injected from the premix cell to the reactor
leading to a pressure rise of ϳ30–50 psi. The injected vol-
ume corresponded to ϳ0.15–0.2 mg of fluorinated precur-
sors or ϳ10−4 mg of Al͑acac͒3. The samples were exposed to
the precursor for a time ranging from 30 s to 3 min, and then
the reaction cell was vented and flushed for 1–2 min with
liquid/supercritical CO2. The reaction cell was then repres-
surized and an oxidizing or a reducing agent ͑B͒ was in-
jected. For oxide films, ϳ0.3 ml of liquid oxidizer ͓30%
aqueous solution of H2O2 or 50% tert-butyl peracetate
͑TBA͒ in mineral spirits͔ was injected in each cycle. For
palladium deposition, ultra high purity H2 ͑99.999%, ϳ3.5
ϫ10−4 mol/cycle͒ was used. In every case, the molar quan-
tity of the injected oxidant/reductant was much larger than
required for stoichiometric reaction. Therefore, it is expected
that the growth rate would be determined by the amount of
precursor adsorbed and the cycle time. After 1–3 min, the
reaction cell was vented and flushed and the cycle was re-
peated to build up a macroscopic film thickness. A typical
cycle time was ϳ20 min, primarily due to the use of manual
hardware. Reasonably short cycle times ͑ϳ1 min͒ can be
expected for a more automated and optimized reactor
system.
C ͑285 eV͒ for both samples, but for the sample deposited
with peroxide, a second peak at 289.3 eV is observed, in-
dicative of carbonate in the film. The intensity of the Al 2p
peak indicates significantly lower growth rates when TBA
was used as the oxidant. Use of the fluorinated precursor
Al͑hfac͒ and H2O2 generally results in thicker films com-
3
pared to Al͑acac͒3–H2O2, but there is evidence for alumi-
num hydroxide and carbonate species present in the as-
deposited films when the Al͑hfac͒ is used.4 Film thickness
3
by ellipsometry versus cycle time was studied for Al2O3
films from Al͑hfac͒3 and H2O2 ͑native silicon oxide, 100 °C,
2000 psi͒, and the results are shown in Fig. 3. Each data
point in Fig. 3 was obtained by taking an arithmetic average
of 3–7 values measured on one or more samples with iden-
tical number of cycles. Clearly, film thickness increases lin-
early with number of deposition cycles. However, a signifi-
cant effect of Al͑hfac͒ exposure time on the film thickness
3
per cycle is observed. For the same process conditions, an
increase in precursor exposure time from 30 s to 3 min re-
sulted in nearly fourfold increase in film growth rate ͑Fig. 3͒.
Also, growth rate dependence on the sample orientation was
observed, suggesting a convective flow effect in the reactor
during the deposition. When the deposition surface ͓polished
surface of Si͑100͔͒ was placed in a direct exposure to the
precursor flow, a high growth rate of 5.6 Å/cycle was ob-
served for 30 s of precursor exposure time. However, when
the deposition surface was directed away from the precursor
inlet, the growth rate was 2.1 Å/cycle for the same exposure
time. The observed thickness per growth cycle and the con-
vective flow dependence of growth rate are consistent with
multilayer growth per cycle. Water is generally immiscible
with sc CO2, so the use of aqueous H2O2 peroxide in the
process is expected to lead to a two-phase condition in the
growth cell, which could lead to nonuniform growth. How-
ever, the Al2O3 film did not show evidence for discontinuous
growth over the film surface, consistent with the growth be-
ing determined by the amount of precursor adsorbed during
the exposure cycle, rather than the delivery of oxidizer to the
Films were analyzed by ellipsometry and x-ray photo-
electron spectroscopy ͑XPS͒.
A Rudolf ellipsometer
͑632.8 nm, 70° fixed angle͒ was used to measure the oxide
thickness. XPS was conducted using a Riber LAS3000
͑MAC2 analyzer, Mg K␣ h=1253.6 eV, nonmonochro-
matic x-ray source͒ at 75° take-off-angle with 0.1 eV step
size. Three different sets of precursors were studied for cy-
clic deposition of aluminum oxide: Al͑hfac͒ with H2O2,
3
Al͑acac͒ with H2O2, and Al͑acac͒ with TBA. Figure 2
3
3
shows the high resolution XPS data for Al 2p core electrons
for films deposited using Al͑acac͒ and either H2O2 or TBA
3
at 120 °C and 1600 psi. For the film deposited with H2O2 a
peak is observed at 74.8 eV indicative of Al–O bonds,
whereas, for the film deposited using tert-butyl peracetate the
peak is shifted to higher binding energy ͑ϳ75.5 eV͒, which
indicates bonding of the Al atoms with more electronegative
species. The C 1s spectrum ͑not shown͒ shows adventitious
surface. Alternatively, rapid diffusion and mixing of the
130.64.175.185 On: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 14:54:41