Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
082904-3 Swaminathan et al.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 082904 ͑2010͒
FIG. 4. ͑Color online͒ Parallel conductance loss peaks ͑Gp͒ in the frequency domain for ͑a͒ as-deposited 12 IL sample ͑b͒ Postannealed 12 IL sample. ͑c͒ Dit
distribution in the p-type Ge band gap for as-deposited and postannealed 12 IL samples. Dit extraction was done by conductance measurements at 230 K.
subnanometer equivalent oxide thickness ͑EOT͒ can poten-
tially be reached if the substrate capacitance is taken into
consideration ͑beyond the scope of this study͒. The CETs for
the 12 IL and 30 IL stacks were observed to be 1.8 and 2.5
nm, respectively ͓Figs. 3͑b͒ and 3͑c͔͒. Assuming a k value of
7 for the ALD-Al2O3 layer, as determined in our previous
studies,12 k for TiO2 was calculated from the C–V plots and
TEM thickness calibration to be in the range of 32–35. This
k value is lower than the expected value of ϳ60 for bulk
rutile phase, as described earlier, and is attributed to the
largely amorphous nature of the ALD-TiO2. The hysteresis
for all three samples was observed to be Ͻ10 mV at Vfb,
indicative of low density of defects contributing to charge
trapping in the IL and the TiO2 film. The frequency disper-
sion in accumulation appears to decrease as the IL thickness
increases ͓Figs. 3͑a͒–3͑c͔͒. This suggests an increasing influ-
ence of traps in the dielectric layers on the measured C–V
characteristics as the Al2O3 IL is thinned down. The Vfb is
observed to shift toward positive gate bias as we increase the
IL thickness. This shift is consistent with a large negative
fixed charge incorporated in Al2O3/Ge stacks. As will be
reported elsewhere,12 the fixed charge for these
ALD-Al2O3/Ge stacks resides predominantly at the interface
rather than in the “bulk” of the Al2O3 layer.
We performed low temperature conductance measure-
ments on the 12 IL sample to extract the interface state den-
sity ͑Dit͒. The weak inversion response that gives rise to the
“bump” in the 1 kHz curve at room temperature ͓Fig. 3͑b͔͒ is
completely suppressed at 230 K ͑not shown͒. Figures 4͑a͒
and 4͑b͒ show the interface trap conductance Gp/, as a
function of the angular frequency , in the depletion-to-weak
inversion surface potential regime for the as-deposited and
the post-FGA stacks, respectively. It can be seen that the
conductance in the post-FGA case is an order of magnitude
less for the as-deposited gate stack. Figure 4͑c͒ shows the Dit
distribution across a portion of the Ge band gap, extracted
from the conductance peaks for both the as-deposited and FG
annealed samples. It is evident that FGA reduces the Dit sig-
nificantly, both at midgap and approaching the band edges.
The minimum Dit of the postannealed samples was calcu-
lated to be 3ϫ1011 cm−2 eV−1. This indicates that the elec-
trical quality of the interface is comparable to that reported
for much thicker, stoichiometric GeO2 surface passivation
layers on Ge.10,13 The extent to which FGA promotes
H-induced passivation of dangling bonds is unclear. Ab initio
simulations and some experimental results suggest that Ge
dangling bond defects are negatively charged and are un-
likely to be passivated by atomic hydrogen, which also be-
haves an acceptor in Ge.14,15 Water-vapor based, oxidant-rich
ALD promotes residual –OH incorporation in as-deposited
oxide thin films. The interaction of atomic hydrogen with
–OH groups in the high-k oxide may cause monolayer-level
oxidation of the Ge ͑100͒ surface, producing GeO2-like
bonding which has been shown to provide a passive
interface.16
In summary, we have demonstrated that ultrathin Al2O3
ILs deposited by in situ ALD are effective in reducing gate
leakage at the low-CBO, TiO2/Ge interface. We were able to
scale down the CET of these devices to 1.2 nm, indicating
the capacitance scaling potential of such bilayer stacks. We
have also established that FGA is beneficial in lowering the
interface state density; annealed devices exhibited a mini-
mum Ditϳ3ϫ1011 cm−2 eV−1 near midgap. This study sug-
gests the potential of ALD-Al2O3 ILs as a route to achieving
interface passivation in higher-k/Ge MOS devices.
This research was supported by the MSD FCRP Focus
Center and Stanford INMP. S.S acknowledges financial sup-
port from the Yansouni Stanford Graduate Fellowship.
1Y. Kamata, Mater. Today 11, 30 ͑2008͒.
2Y. Yeo, T.-J. King, and C. Hu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 2091 ͑2002͒.
3P. W. Peacock and J. Robertson, J. Appl. Phys. 92, 4712 ͑2002͒.
4J. Robertson, Eur. Phys. J.: Appl. Phys. 28, 265 ͑2004͒.
5J. Robertson, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 18, 1785 ͑2000͒.
6G. D. Wilk, R. M. Wallace, and J. M. Anthony, J. Appl. Phys. 89, 5243
͑2001͒.
7M. Ritala, M. Leskelä, J.-P. Dekker, C. Mutsaers, P. J. Soininen, and J.
Skarp, Chem. Vap. Deposition 5, 7 ͑1999͒.
8E. H. Nicollian and J. R. Brews, MOS Physics and Technology ͑Wiley,
New York, 1981͒.
9K. Martens, C. O. Chui, G. Brammertz, B. De Jaeger, D. Kuzum, M.
Meuris, M. Heyns, T. Krishnamohan, K. Saraswat, H. E. Maes, and G.
Groeseneken, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 55, 547 ͑2008͒.
10D. Kuzum, T. Krishnamohan, A. J. Pethe, A. K. Okyay, Y. Oshima, S.
Yun, J. P. McVittie, P. A. Pianetta, P. C. McIntyre, and K. C. Saraswat,
IEEE Electron Device Lett. 29, 328 ͑2008͒.
11V. V. Afanas’ev, A. Stesmans, A. Delabie, F. Bellenger, M. Houssa, and
M. Meuris, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 022109 ͑2008͒.
12S. Swaminathan, Y. Oshima, and P. C. McIntyre ͑unpublished͒.
13A. Delabie, F. Bellenger, M. Houssa, T. Conard, S. V. Elshocht, M. Cay-
max, M. Heyns, and M. Meuris, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 082904 ͑2007͒.
14V. V. Afanas’ev, Y. G. Fedorenko, and A. Stesmans, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87,
032107 ͑2005͒.
15R. Weber, A. Janotti, P. Rinke, and C. G. Van de Walle, Appl. Phys. Lett.
91, 142101 ͑2007͒.
16Y. Oshima, Y. Sun, D. Kuzum, T. Sugawara, K. C. Saraswat, P. Pianetta,
and P. C. McIntyre, J. Electrochem. Soc. 155, G304 ͑2008͒.
132.206.7.165 On: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:16:55