C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
cyclized photoproduct (2) no longer quenches the MLCT excited
states through energy transfer, and removal of this pathway affords
strong MLCT-based emission in the red, Figure 1. The excited-
state lifetime of this species independently measured with pulsed
luminescence and transient absorption was ∼1.2 µs and displayed
single-exponential decay kinetics. The 2 f 1 phototransformation
in CH3CN was accomplished using 230-nm excitation for 40 min;
however, complete reversion to the starting point was never realized.
Although switching occurs, changes in the absorption and emission
extremes are observed with repeated cycling (see Supporting
Information). This behavior obviously precludes the use of 1 in
rewritable memories. Attempts to heat samples of 2 for 60 min
at 70 °C resulted in less than 10% reversion to 1, illustrating
modest thermal stability for 2. Importantly, the cycloaddition
photochemistry is not induced with visible excitation (>445 nm),
and after irradiation at 390 nm, continuous exposure to 450 nm
does not degrade the emission signal that emerges from the sample.
These solution studies suggested that 1 might potentially serve as
the active component in a binary ROM.
To test this hypothesis, 1a or 1b (0.05 wt %) was dispersed in
a polystyrene (PS) matrix. Slow evaporation of these CH2Cl2
mixtures resulted in optically transparent films with 5-20 µm
thickness. Similar to that observed in solution, the MLCT based-
emission in both samples was nearly quantitatively quenched when
these solid-state samples were initially exposed to visible light. This
emission could be “turned-on” or written with a variety of excitation
sources that included a 450-W Xe lamp/monochromator (390 nm),
a Nd:YAG laser (355 nm), a UV-LED (390 nm), a N2-pumped
dye laser (390 nm), and a frequency-doubled Ti:sapphire laser (400
nm). Analogous to the solution phase, visible photolysis has no
effect on the observed emission intensity in the solid samples. After
completion of the “write” cycle, 2a and 2b display strong
photoluminescence centered near 650 nm when excited in the
visible. This photoluminescent state is believed to persist indefinitely
as the reverse photochromic reaction is largely suppressed in the
PS matrix. We believe this lack of reversibility is attributed to the
strong UV absorption of the PS matrix, advantageous for ROM
applications.
The PS materials doped with 1a and 1b were used for imaging
µm-sized objects. This was accomplished by 390-nm photolysis
performed through transmission electron microscopy (TEM) grids
with features in the µm-size regime. In these experiments, TEM
grids of varying dimensions were used as contact masks similar to
that used in photolithography.11 After the UV photolysis, the masks
were removed, and the formed images were observed in a
conventional fluorescence microscope (100-W Hg lamp excitation
source) using appropriate filters for blue-light excitation (450 nm).
Figure 2 illustrates one of the images generated from this experi-
ment. These samples were re-imaged 6 months later with no
apparent degradation or variation in the image resolution, providing
evidence of the durability of these materials for long-term memory
applications. Features on the µm level can be easily distinguished
in these samples, suggesting that with near-field techniques,
emission in these materials could be imaged on the nanometer scale,
greatly improving two-dimensional data storage density. As far as
writing speed is concerned, measurable microscope images have
been formed in these films resulting from 1-s exposure to 400-nm
light from a frequency doubled Ti:sapphire laser (80 MHz, 150 fs
fwhm).
Figure 2. Microscope image of a TEM grid in the bright field (top) and
fluorescence microscope image (bottom) generated from 390-nm photolysis
(not collimated) of 1a (0.05% in a 20-µm PS film) through a TEM grid
contact mask. The red regions indicate luminescence and the dark regions
are nonluminescent.
Supporting Information Available: Preparations, experimental
details, and selected spectroscopic data (PDF). This material is available
References
(1) Irie, M. Chem. ReV. 2001, 100, 1685-1716.
(2) (a) Photochromism: Molecules and Systems; Durr, H., Bouas-Laurent,
H., Eds.; Elsevier: New York, 1990. (b) PhotoreactiVe Materials for
Ultrahigh-Density Optical Memory; Irie, M., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam,
1994. (c) Organic Photochromic and Thermochromic Compounds; Crano,
J. C., Guglielmetti, R. J., Eds.; Plenum: New York, 1999; Vol. 1.
(3) (a) Huck, N. P. M.; Feringa, B. L. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995,
1095-1096. (b) Daub, J.; Beck, M.; Knorr, A.; Spreitzer, H. Pure Appl.
Chem. 1996, 68, 1399-1404. (c) Takeshita, M.; Irie, M. Chem. Lett. 1998,
1123-1124. (d) Myles, A. J.; Branda, N. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
123, 177-178.
(4) (a) Birge, R. R.; Gillespie, N. B.; Izaguirre, E. W.; Kusnetzow, A.;
Lawrence, A. F.; Singh, D.; Song, Q. W.; Schmidt, E.; Stuart, J. A.;
Seetharaman, S.; Wise, K. J. J. Phys. Chem. B. 1999, 103, 10746-10766.
(b) Hampp, N. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 1755-1776.
(5) (a) Fan, M.-G.; Zhao, W. Fulgide Family Compounds: Synthesis,
Photochromism, and Applications; Plenum: New York, 1999. (b)
Yokoyama, Y. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 1717-1739. (c) Berkovic, G.;
Krongauz, V.; Weiss, V. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 1741-1753.
(6) (a) Tsivgoulis, G. M.; Lehn, J.-M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995,
34, 1119-1122. (b) Fernandez-Acebes, A.; Lehn, J.-M. AdV. Mater. 1998,
10, 1519-1522. (c) Fernandez-Acebes, A.; Lehn, J.-M. Chem. Eur. J.
1999, 5, 3285-3292.
(7) Anthracene is a well-known triplet state quencher of Ru(II) diimine
chromophores, for example: (a) Boyde, S.; Strouse, G. F.; Jones, W. E.;
Meyer, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 7448-7454. (b) Wilson, G.
J.; Launikonis, A.; Sasse, W. H. F.; Mau, A. W.-H. J. Phys. Chem. A
1997, 101, 4860-4866.
(8) (a) Beyeler, A.; Belser, P.; De Cola, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1997, 36, 2779-2781(b) Belser, P.; Bernhard, S.; Blum, C.; Beyeler, A.;
De Cola, L.; Balzani, V. Coord. Chem. ReV. 1999, 190-192, 155-169.
(9) For example: (a) Bergmark, W. R.; Jones, G., II; Reinhardt, T. E.; Halpern,
A. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 6665-6672. (b) Becker, H.-D. Chem.
ReV. 1993, 93, 145-172.
(10) Application of a dianthryl compound in optical memory: Dvornikov, A.
S.; Bouas-Laurent, H.; Desvergne, J.-P.; Rentzepis, P. M. J. Mater. Chem.
1999, 9, 1081-1084.
Acknowledgment. F.N.C. acknowledges support from the
National Science Foundation (CAREER Award CHE-0134782) and
the American Chemical Society (ACS-PRF 36156-G6). D.S.T. was
supported by a Hammond Fellowship of the McMaster Endowment.
(11) Mejiritski, A.; Polykarpov, A.; Sarker, A. M.; Neckers, D. C. Chem. Mater.
1996, 8, 1360-1362.
JA0255608
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 124, NO. 17, 2002 4563