D. Zhang et al. / Tetrahedron 62 (2006) 10729–10733
10733
oscilloscope and analyzed using Origin software. Generally,
four to six runs were conducted per phosphine, and errors are
reported as one standard deviation.
acetone–20% methylene chloride/liquid N2 were used
for controlling the irradiation temperatures at ꢀ80 and
ꢀ90 ꢁC, respectively. After the photooxidation, the NMR
tubes were frozen in liquid N2 and subsequently placed
into the precooled NMR spectrometer.
3.4. General procedures for arylphosphines photo-
oxidation by singlet oxygen
Photooxidation reaction mixtures of 0.01–0.10 M in tris-
(ortho-methoxyphenyl)phosphine and singlet oxygen sensi-
tizers (tetraphenylporphyrin or C70, max absorption was
generally kept between 0.5 and 0.6) were prepared in test
tubes or NMR tubes. For NMR analyses, deuterated solvents
were employed during the photooxidation. The samples
were presaturated with oxygen for 1–2 min and then irradi-
ated under a constant stream of oxygen with a 250 W tung-
sten–halogen lamp. A 492 nm cutoff filter was used so that
the arylphosphines themselves were not irradiated.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by a Henry Dreyfus Teacher–
Scholar Award. Support by the NIH-NIGMS MBRS
program (Award number GM08101) is also gratefully ac-
knowledged.
References and notes
1. Clennan, E. L. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 875 and references
therein.
2. Jensen, F.; Greer, A.; Clennan, E. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 4439.
3.5. Competition experiments between phosphines and
9,10-dimethylanthracene
The phosphine compounds were irradiated in the presence of
a singlet oxygen acceptor namely 9,10-dimethylanthracene
(DMA), which removes singlet oxygen by chemical reaction
only so that kT¼kr¼2.5ꢃ107 Mꢀ1 sꢀ1 in CDCl3.9 We used
tetraphenylporphyrin (TPP) or C70 as sensitizers. Phosphine
concentration ranged from 0.0005 to 0.003 M, and DMA
concentration ranged from 0.0005 to 0.004 M. Irradiation
times ranged from 5 to 30 min (for compound 5). Conversion
of each compound was generally kept between 20 and 80%.
3. Liang, J.-J.; Gu, C.-L.; Kacher, M. L.; Foote, C. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1983, 105, 4717.
4. Gu, C.-L.; Foote, C. S.; Kacher, M. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981,
103, 5949.
5. Clennan, E. L.; Pace, A. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 6665.
6. Nahm, K.; Foote, C. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 909.
7. Tsuji, S.; Kondo, M.; Ishiguro, K.; Sawaki, Y. J. Org. Chem.
1993, 58, 5055.
8. Nahm, K.; Li, Y.; Evanseck, J. D.; Houk, K.; Foote, C. S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 4879.
1
DMA concentrations were monitored by H NMR while
phosphine concentrations were monitored by 31P NMR.
All of the NMR peaks used to determine concentrations
are summarized below.
9. Gao, R.; Ho, D. G.; Dong, T.; Khuu, D.; Franco, N.; Sezer, O.;
Selke, M. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3719.
10. Ho, D. G.; Gao, R.; Chung, H.-Y.; Celaje, J.; Selke, M. Science
2003, 302, 259.
Phosphine
31P NMR in
CDCl3, ppm
1H NMR in CDCl3
(methyl) ppm
11. Bolduc, P. R.; Goe, G. L. J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39, 3178.
12. Beaver, B. D.; Gao, L.; Fedak, M.; Coleman, M. M.;
Sobkowiak, M. Energy Fuels 2002, 16, 1134.
13. Beaver, B. D.; Burgess-Clifford, C.; Fedak, M. G.; Gao, L.;
Iyer, P. S.; Sobkowiak, M. Energy Fuels 2006, 20, 1639.
14. Tolman, C. A. Chem. Rev. 1977, 77, 313.
15. Hirsivaara, L.; Guerricabeitia, L.; Haukka, M.; Suomalainen,
P.; Laitinen, R. H.; Pakkanen, T. A.; Pursiainen, J. Inorg.
Chim. Acta 2000, 307, 47. Ab initio calculations by these
authors indicate that smaller cone angles, which would make
the phosphorous atom more exposed to intermolecular attack,
correspond to higher energy conformers.
(p-CH3OC6H4)3P (1)
(p-CH3OC6H4)3PO
(C6H5)3P (2)
(C6H5)3PO
(p-FC6H4)3P (3)
(p-FC6H4)3PO
ꢀ17.8
21.4
3.81
3.84
ꢀ13.0
21.2
ꢀ16.6
18.9
(p-ClC6H4)3P (4)
(p-ClC6H4)3PO
(p-CF3C6H4)3P (5)
(p-CF3C6H4)3PO
DMA
ꢀ16.0
19.0
ꢀ13.7
17.7
3.11
2.16
DMAO2
(o-CH3C6H4)3P (9)
(o-CH3C6H4)3PO (10)
(o-CH3C6H4)3PO2 (11)
(o-CH3OC6H4)3P (6)
(o-CH3OC6H4)3PO (7)
(o-CH3OC6H4)3PO2 (8)
ꢀ37.2
29.1
22.2
16. Kim, K. C.; Lee, K. A.; Sohn, C. K.; Sung, D. D.; Oh, H. K. J.;
Lee, I. J. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 2978.
17. Bonesi, S. M.; Fagnoni, M.; Albini, A. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69,
928.
18. Higgins, R.; Foote, C. S.; Cheng, H. Adv. Chem. Ser. 1968, 77,
102.
ꢀ39.2
3.76
3.58
3.60, 3.73
26.0
27.0
Generally, four to six runs were conducted per phosphine,
and errors are reported as one standard deviation. A control
experiment demonstrated that the DMA endoperoxide does
not oxidize the arylphosphines during the timeframe of the
competition experiments (i.e., 1 h or less).
19. We use the term indirect physical quenching to describe deac-
tivation of singlet oxygen via the formation of an unstable
intermediate, which then loses a dioxygen molecule. Direct
physical quenching refers to physical deactivation without
the formation of any unstable adduct (i.e., energy transfer).
This terminology has been used for the reaction of singlet
oxygen with organic sulfides. Foote, C. S.; Peters, J. W.
IUPAC Congr., 23rd, Spec. Lec. 1971, 4, 129.
20. Eapen, K. C.; Tamborski, C. J. Fluorine Chem. 1980, 15,
239.
3.6. Low temperature NMR studies
Samples were directly irradiated in NMR tubes placed
in a transparent Dewar flask. Acetone/liquid N2 and 80%