M. E. Phelps, J. C. Mazziotta and H. R. Schelbert, Raven Press, New
York, 1986, ch. 9–11; (b) B. La˚ngstro¨m and R. F. Dannals, in Principles
of Nuclear Medicine, ed. H. N. Wagner, Jr., Saunders, Philadelphia, PA,
2nd edn., 1995, section 1, ch. 11, pp 166–178; (c) J. S. Fowler and A. P.
Wolf, Acc. Chem. Res., 1997, 30, 181–188.
3 (a) A. F. Shields, Mol. Imaging Biol., 2006, 8, 141–150; (b) J. R. Bading
and A. F. Shields, J. Nucl. Med., 2008, 49, 64S–80S; (c) A. B. Tsuji,
C. Sogawa, A. Sugyo, H. Sudo, J. Toyohara, M. Koizumi, M. Abe, O.
Hino, Y. Harada, T. Furukawa, K. Suzuki and T. Saga, Nucl. Med.
Biol., 2009, 36, 379–388.
4 (a) B. M. Sundoro-Wu, B. Schmall, P. S. Conti, J. R. Dahl, P. Drumm
and J. K. Jacobsen, Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isot., 1984, 35, 705–708; (b) T. V.
Borght, D. Labar, S. Pauwels and L. Lambotte, Int. J. Radiat. Appl.
Instrum., Part A, 1991, 42, 103–104; (c) P. Goethals, F. Volders, J. V. der
Eycken, M. van Eijkeren, I. Lemahieu and R. Dams, Nucl. Med. Biol.,
1997, 24, 713–718. In this paper, the moisture-sensitive strong base
difficult to justify the stoichiometry for an extremely small amount
of [11C]CH3I was used, resulting in causing inevitable production of a
large amount of undesired demethylated derivative as well as the need
of tedious separation of regioisomers.
18 V. W. Rosso, D. A. Lust, P. J. Bernot, J. A. Grosso, S. P. Modi, A.
Rusowicz, T. C. Sedergran, J. H. Simpson, S. K. Srivastava, M. J.
Humora and N. G. Anderson, Org. Process Res. Dev., 1997, 1, 311–
314; S. H. Hungerbu¨hler, C. Scho¨neich, M. Morton, D. G. V. Velde,
G. S. Wilson, K.-D. Asmus and R. S. Glass, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997,
119, 2134–2145; S. L. Murphy, S. L. Loeb and G. K. H. Shimizu,
Tetrahedron, 1998, 54, 15137–15146; D. W. Domaille, L. Zeng and C. J.
Chang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 1194–1195; R. Angamuthu, P.
Byers, M. Lutz, A. L. Spek and E. Bouwman, Science, 2010, 327,
313–315.
19 If 5Cu2 would have similar pKa as phenol (pKa = 10.0) by activation
with CuI, the formation of 10 by proton abstraction from 5Cu2 with
2-
CO3 would be calculated to be ca. 107 times larger than by F-, where
pKa = 10.3 and pKa = 3.2 were used for the corresponding conjugate
acids HCO3- and HF, respectively, supprting high superiority of K2CO3
to CsF for the ability to avoid the destannylation. For pKas, see; I.
Luyten, K. W. Pankiewicz, K. A. Watanabe and J. Chattopadhyaya,
J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 1033–1040; CRC Handbook of Chemistry
and Physics, ed. D. R. Lide, CRC Press, Washington, DC, 2003-
2004.
5 (a) T. J. Mangner, R. W. Klecker, L. Anderson and A. F. Shields, Nucl.
Med. Biol., 2003, 30, 215–224; (b) M. M. Alauddin, P. S. Conti and
J. D. Fissekis, J. Labelled Compd. Radiopharm., 2003, 46, 285–289;
(c) L. Samuelsson and B. La˚ngstro¨m, J. Labelled Compd. Radiopharm.,
2003, 46, 263–272; (d) V. Paolillo, S. Riese, J. G. Gelovani and M. M.
Alauddin, J. Labelled Compd. Radiopharm., 2009, 52, 553–558.
6 M. Bragadin, D. Marton, G. Scutari and P. Dell’Antone, J. Inorg.
Biochem., 2000, 78, 205–207; B. Buck, A. Mascioni, L. Que, Jr. and G.
Veglia, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 13316–13317.
7 (a) J. Madsen, P. Merachtsaki, P. Davoodpour, M. Bergstro¨m, B.
La˚ngstro¨m, K. Andersen, C. Thomsen, L. Martiny and G. M. Kundsen,
Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2003, 11, 3447–3456; (b) See also: D. K. Morita,
J. K. Stille and J. R. Norton, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 8576–8581
(the cross-coupling reaction of methyl iodide and (p-methoxy)phenyl
tributylstannane using Pd(PPh3)4 as a catalyst, giving poor yield).
8 (a) J. A. Secrist III, K. N. Tiwari, J. M. Riordan and J. A. Montgomery,
J. Med. Chem., 1991, 34, 2361–2366; (b) W. B. Parker, S. C. Shaddix,
L. M. Rose, K. N. Tiwari, J. A. Montgomery, J. A. Secrist III and L. L.
Bennett, Jr., Biochem. Pharmacol., 1995, 50, 687–695.
9 (a) J. Toyohara, K. Kumata, K. Fukushi, T. Irie and K. Suzuki, J. Nucl.
Med., 2006, 47, 1717–1722; (b) J. Toyohara, M. Okada, C. Toramatsu,
K. Suzuki and T. Irie, Nucl. Med. Biol., 2008, 35, 67–74. [11C]4 was also
synthesized using the corresponding trimethylstannyl precursor under
the same conditions; see also ref. 3c.
10 The synthesis of PET probes is rather different from the usual organic
syntheses. The reaction involves the trapping of an extremely small
amount of 11CH3I (approximately 100 nmol level containing 12CH3I)
with a large amount (mg level, >1000 equiv) of reacting substrate.
Therefore, we here set up the reaction using an excess amount of a
tributylstannyl substrate for CH3I ([11C]CH3I) to meet the demand.
11 For details, see the experimental section.
20 Yield was obtained according to the equation of 100% ¥ (radioactivity
of desired product)/(total radioactivity of the products) based on the
radioactivity observed in HPLC.
21 The same reaction was conducted using the conditions previously
reported5c for Pd2(dba)3/P(o-CH3C6H4)3 (1 : 4 in molar ratio) in DMF
at 130 ◦C for 5 min, giving [methyl-11C]thymidine [11C]1 in 17% (HPLC
analytical yield).
22 [11C]1 was obtained in 91% (HPLC analytical yield) under the
Pd2(dba)3/P(o-CH3C6H4)3/CuBr/CsF (1 : 32 : 10 : 25 in molar ratio)
system in DMF, 65 ◦C, 5 min. Thus the increase of the amount of
the CuBr/CsF tends to give the desired product in slightly higher yield.
23 We improved the reaction conditions to some extent under keeping
the specified smaller-sized reaction vial combined with a preparative
HPLC column for an actual PET probe synthesis in mind. Particularly,
the limited solubility of the phosphine was compelled to the tedious
preparative HPLC operations to purify small amounts of PET probes
from an insoluble heterogeneous mixture. See experimental section and
reference 1i.
24 See also Table 1 entry 5.
25 This study is focused on the rapid C-[11C]methylation. In this context,
11CH3PdI-phosphine complex is involved directly in the cross-coupling
reaction with a stannyl substrate, and therefore, the radioactivity of
non-volatile 11CH3PdI{P(o-CH3C6H4)3}n formed by trapping 11CH3I
with the Pd0 complex was selected as a first checking point of total
radioactivity.
26 Various factors such as radiolysis inducing radical reactions under high
concentration during the evaporation of the solvent and the separation
by preparative HPLC, the absorption on the HPLC solid support, time
elongation, etc. are considered to be reflected on lowering the isolated
yield. As a good example about the deviation of the isolated yield
and efforts to suppress such a yield decreasing by adding a radical
trapping agent to be sacrificed, see the synthesis of various 11C-labeled
2-arylpropionic acids and their esters, see: M. Takashima-Hirano, M.
Shukuri, T. Takashima, M. Goto, Y. Wada, Y. Watanabe, H. Onoe, H.
Doi and M. Suzuki, Chem.–Eur. J., 2010, 16, 4250–4258.
27 The radioactivities needed for animal and human PET imaging are
10-50 and 100-500 MBq, respectively.
12 S. P. H. Mee, V. Lee and J. E. Baldwin, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2004,
43, 1132–1136.
13 NMP solvent was overlapped with thymidine on HPLC analysis and
therefore, NMP was removed by evaporation under reduced pressure
before analysis of the yield.
14 M. Maltese, S. Passerini, S. Nunzianta-Cesaro, S. Dobos and L.
Harsa´nyi, J. Mol. Struct., 1984, 116, 49–65; Yu. P. Blagoi, E. D.
Radchenko, S. G. Stepanian and G. G. Sheina, J. Mol. Struct., 1990,
219, 311–316; P. Colarusso, K. Q. Zhang, B. Guo and P. F. Bernath,
Chem. Phys. Lett., 1997, 269, 39–48.
28 We are also trying another approach for synthesis of 4¢-[methyl-
11C]thiothymidine using boronic acid ester.1h.
29 Y. Yoshimura, K. Kitano, K. Yamada, S. Sakata, S. Miura, N. Ashida
and H. Machida, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2000, 8, 1545–1558; J. K. Watts,
K. Sadalapure, N. Choubdar, B. M. Pinto and M. J. Damha, J. Org.
Chem., 2006, 71, 921–925.
30 T. Imanishi and S. Obika, Chem. Commun., 2002, 1653–
1659.
15 P. Gunaga, H. R. Moon, W. J. Choi, D. H. Shin, J. G. Park and L. S.
Jeong, Curr. Med. Chem., 2004, 11, 2585–2637.
16 4¢-Thiothymidine was insoluble in NMP. Thus the resulting suspension
was dissolved in DMF before HPLC analysis.
17 In this context, the reaction of 6 using the CuBr/CsF synergic system
(Table 1 entry 7) gave only a small amount of destannylated product, 2¢-
deoxyuridine as byproduct (5% for initial amount of 6). The mechanism
of destannylation remains unclear. Heteroaromatic stannanes such
as neutral or pyridine-related basic compounds did not give such
destannylated compounds at all.1i.
31 C. F. Foulon, Y. Z. Zhang, S. J. Adelstein and A. I. Kassis, Appl. Radiat.
Isot., 1995, 46, 1039–1946.
32 In this two-pot procedure, the 6 equiv of phosphine for Pd2(dba)3 was
used to trap [11C]CH3I by a Pd0/phosphine complex, and 10 equiv of
phosphine was added in another flask to dissolve the copper salt as well
as to promote the coupling reaction efficiently.
4294 | Org. Biomol. Chem., 2011, 9, 4287–4294
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
©