86
B. Ngamsom et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic 63 (2010) 81–86
4. Conclusions
A micro-reactor containing polymer monoliths formed inside
the micro-channels was developed for biotransformation reac-
tions catalysed by the thermophilic l-aminoacylase from T. litoralis.
The micro-reactor proved to be a useful tool for high through-
put screening of potential substrates, where individual substrates
could be evaluated in approximately 10 min after reactor charac-
terisation. This robust system was reliable (as we determined that
enzyme activity was retained for 50 h even at 50 ◦C) and it also
reduced enzyme consumption with high stability under both oper-
ational and storage conditions. Additionally, it could be operated
at room temperature to yield similar enzyme activities for some
preferred substrates (N-benzoyl-l-Phe and N-chloroacetyl-l-Phe).
The operating temperature could also be increased for less pre-
ferred substrates to gain higher enzyme activities. Clearly using the
reactor at room temperature was advantageous as we had demon-
strated that the activity was retained for a longer period of time.
The stability of the enzyme micro-reactor system as well as the
enzyme activity in the appropriate solvent to aid substrate solubil-
ity suggested the potential use of this system for high throughput
biotransformations.
Fig. 4. Effect of solvents on substrate conversion; the reaction was performed with
10 mM N-benzoyl-l-phenylalanine at room temperature for a period of 1 h using a
flow rate of 1 l min−1
.
reliable manner compared to utilising the free enzyme in a conven-
tional batch system. The micro-reactor experiments were analysed
every hour in order to evaluate the reaction efficiency over time,
however in screening experiments it was possible to conduct
individual experiments within 10 min, the limitation being the sen-
sitivity of the analytical method used for quantification. The major
advantages include the lower quantity of reagent required, the re-
useable nature of the enzyme in the micro-reactor and the milder
reaction conditions introduced by the use of micro-reactors.
The system developed was also useful for screening new poten-
tial substrates with a N-benzoyl-protecting group which was not
the most specific substrate for l-aminoacylase from other sources.
Further system development will be directed towards improv-
ing the porosity of the monoliths, with a view to a reduction in
back pressure, since this should allow higher flow rates and subse-
quently a higher throughput to be attained.
3.3. Use of the developed micro-reactor system in organic
solvents
Acknowledgement
Many biotransformation reactions need to be carried out in
organic solvents due to the insolubility of the substrates being
used and where inactivation is observed for homogeneous biocat-
alysts, enzyme immobilisation onto solid supports often helps to
stabilise enzymes for use under these conditions. Rapid inactivation
of l-aminoacylase from T. litoralis in the presence of 50% organic
solvents at 60 ◦C was previously reported [5] and the presence of
10% N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) was also found to have caused
more than a 70% decrease in stability of aminoacylase from hog
kidney after 50 min at 25 ◦C [24].
This work was financially supported by Engineering and Physi-
cal Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), UK.
References
[1] B. Schulze, M.G. Wubbolts, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 10 (1999) 609–615.
[2] A.J.J. Straathof, S. Panke, A. Schmid, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 13 (2002) 548–
556.
[3] D.J. Pollard, J.M. Woodley, Trends Biotechnol. 25 (2006) 66–73.
[4] M.A. Rouchi, Chem. Eng. News 80 (2002) 43–50.
[5] H.S. Toogood, E.J. Hollingsworth, R.C. Brown, I.N. Taylor, S.J.C. Taylor, R.
McCague, J.A. Littlechild, Extremophiles 6 (2002) 111–122.
[6] S.V. Story, A.M. Grunden, M.W.W. Adams, J. Bacteriol. 183 (2001) 4259–
4268.
[7] K. Tanimoto, N. Higashi, M. Nishioka, K. Ishikawa, M. Taya, FEBS J. 275 (2008)
1140–1149.
[8] H.S. Toogood, I.N. Taylor, R.C. Brown, S.J.C. Taylor, R. McCague, J.A. Littlechild,
Biocatal. Biotrans. 20 (2002) 241–249.
[9] A. Manz, D.J. Harrison, E.M.J. Verpoorte, J.C. Fettinger, H. Lüdi, H.M. Widmer,
Chim. Int. J. Chem. 45 (1991) 103–105.
[10] C. Wiles, P. Watts, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 10 (2008) 1655–1671.
[11] C. Wiles, P. Watts, Chem. Commun. (2007) 4928–4930.
[12] M. Miyazaki, H. Maeda, Trends Biotechnol. 24 (2006) 463–470.
[13] G.H. Seong, R.M. Crooks, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 (2002) 13360–13361.
[14] A.M. Hickey, B. Ngamsom, C. Wiles, G.M. Greenway, P. Watts, J.A. Littlechild,
Biotechnol. J. 4 (2009) 510–516.
[15] M.A. Holden, S.-Y. Jung, P.S. Cremer, Anal. Chem. 76 (2004) 1838–1843.
[16] H. Hisamoto, Y. Shimizu, K. Uchiyama, M. Tokeshi, Y. Kikutani, A. Hibara, T.
Kitamori, Anal. Chem. 75 (2003) 350–354.
[17] N.G. Wilson, T. McCreedy, G.M. Greenway, Analyst 125 (2000) 237–239.
[18] K. Kanno, H. Kawazumi, M. Miyazaki, H. Maeda, M. Fujii, Aust. J. Chem. 55 (2002)
687–690.
[19] T. Honda, M. Miyazaki, M.Y. Yamaguchi, H. Nakamura, H. Maeda, Lab. Chip 7
(2007) 366–372.
Evaluation of enzyme conversion of 10 mM N-benzoyl-l-Phe
in Tris–HCl pH 8.0 buffer, the most favourable substrate, in the
presence of organic solvents was carried out in the developed
micro-reactor using a flow rate of 1 l min−1 and the reaction was
performed at room temperature (the reaction conditions where
100% substrate conversion was found in the aqueous system).
To evaluate the effect of organic solvents on the debenzoylation
of N-benzoyl-l-Phe, the following solvents were studied at vary-
ing proportions (5–50%, v/v); DMF, dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO),
ethanol, methanol and acetone.
At least 50% decrease in enzyme activity generally occurred in
the presence of 50% organic solvents and the effect was less pro-
nounced when lower quantities of solvent were used, Fig. 4. This
can be explained by the fact that the more hydrophobic the sol-
vent molecules, the less favourable binding of the substrate to the
active site, thereby reducing enzyme activity. However the use of
5% DMSO, enough to dissolve the substrate, resulted in only ca. 20%
decrease in enzyme activity. The combination of a small amount
of DMSO and higher reaction temperature suggests the potential
of employing the enzyme in a system where substrate solubility
in Tris–buffer is an issue. It needs to be clarified that when acetone
was used as the solvent the enzyme was inactivated, however when
other solvents were used (ethanol, methanol, DMF and DMSO) this
was not a problem.
[20] C. Viklund, E. Pontén, B. Glad, K. Irgum, P. Hörstedt, F. Svec, Chem. Mater. 9
(1997) 463–471.
[21] C. Yu, M. Xu, F. Svec, J.M. Frechet, J. Polym. Sci. 40 (2002) 755–769.
[22] T. McCreedy, Anal. Chim. Acta 427 (2001) 39.
[23] C. Viklund, F. Svec, J.M.J. Frechet, K. Irgum, Chem. Mater. 8 (1996) 744–750.
[24] L. Boross, C. Sisak, B. Szajani, J. Biotechnol. 66 (1998) 69–73.