Struct Chem
9-[(1′R,2′S,3′S,4′S)-2′,3′-dihydroxyl-4′-hydroxyethoxy-
c y c l o p e n t a n e - 1 ′ - y l ] - 9 H - 2 - p r o p y l t h i o - 6 - ( 3 , 4 -
diflorobenzaldehyde hydrazone)-8-azapurine(1b) H NMR
Computational details
1
Density functional theory at B3LYP/6-31G (d,p) [24] theoret-
ical level was used to optimize the geometries of all stationary
points along the reaction paths. Frequency analysis calcula-
tions were carried out at the same level to classify the located
stationary points as minima (no imaginary frequency) and
transition states (only one imaginary frequency) and to obtain
zero point energies (ZPES) and the thermodynamic correc-
tional data. The B3LYP/6-31G (d,p) intrinsic reaction coordi-
nate (IRC) pathways have also been computed of all the tran-
sition states to determine whether these transition states can
connect the reactants, intermediates or products [25]. The sin-
gle point energies of all the optimized structures were calcu-
lated at B3LYP/6-311G (d,p) level. All the energies listed in
this paper were corrected by thermal corrections. The polar-
ized continuum model (PCM) was used in Consistent
Reaction Field (SCRF) with DMSO as solvent [26–28]. All
of the quantum chemical calculations were performed using
the Gaussian 09 program package [29]. All the geometrical
coordination and single point energies of calculated structures
were provided in Supporting Information.
(400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) 1.01 (3H, t, CH3, J =
7.2 Hz), 1.73 (2H, m, CH2), 2.09 (1H, m, 5′-CH2), 2.67 (1H,
m, 5′-CH2), 3.14 (2H, CH2), 3.52 (4H, m, CH2), 3.78 (1H, s,
CH), 3.98 (1H, s, CH), 4.63 (2H, m, CH, OH), 5.03–5.18 (3H,
m, CH, OH), 7.53–7.92 (3H, m, Ph-H), 8.22, 8.46 (1H, =CH),
12.56, 12.71 (1H, NH). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ
(ppm) 13.71, 22.76, 32.73, 33.80, 60.77, 61.08, 71.28, 74.25,
74.81, 82.25, 115.40 (115.52), 118.39 (118.50), 122.86,
124.78, 132.75, 143.83, 149.36 (149.45), 150.99 (151.08),
153.67, 168.78, 170.72. HRMS (ESI) for [M + H]+: calcd
510.17296, found 510.17287.
9-[(1′R,2′S,3′S,4′S)-2′,3′-dihydroxyl-4′-hydroxyethoxy-
cyclopentane-1′-yl]-9H-2-propylthio-6-(4-nitrobenzaldehyde
hydrazone)-8-azapurine(1c) 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6):
δ (ppm) 1.02 (3H, t, CH3, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.73 (2H, m, CH2), 2.11
(1H, m, 5′-CH2), 2.69 (1H, m, 5′-CH2), 3.16 (2H, CH2), 3.35–
3.53 (4H, m), 3.79 (1H, s, CH), 3.98 (1H, s, CH), 4.63 (2H, m,
CH, OH), 5.04–5.18 (3H, m, CH, OH), 8.09 (2H, Ph-H), 8.30
(2H, Ph-H), 8.33, 8.60 (1H, =CH), 8.68 (1H, s, Ph-H), 12.76,
12.88 (1H, NH). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm)
13.73, 22.75, 32.79, 33.62, 60.76, 61.16, 71.27, 74.24, 74.83,
82.24, 124.52, 128.29, 141.12, 148.11. HRMS (ESI) for [M +
H]+: calcd 519.17688, found 519.17689.
Results and discussion
9-[(1′R,2′S,3′S,4′S)-2′,3′-dihydroxyl-4′-hydroxyethoxy-
cyclopentane-1′-yl]-9H-2-propylthio-6-(4-chlorobenzaldehyde
hydrazone)-8-azapurine(1d) 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6):
δ (ppm) 1.00 (3H, t, CH3, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.73 (2H, m, CH2),
2.10 (1H, m, 5′-CH2), 2.68 (1H, m, 5′-CH2), 3.14 (2H, CH2),
3.52(4H, m, CH2), 3.79 (1H, s, CH), 3.98 (1H, s, CH), 4.63
(2H, m, CH, OH), 5.03–5.18 (3H, m, CH, OH), 7.51–7.88
(4H, m, Ph-H), 8.32 8.50 (1H, =CH), 12.50, 12.64 (1H,
NH). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) 13.73,
22.79, 33.74, 33.60, 60.78, 61.08, 71.27, 74.28, 74.80,
82.26, 122.86, 129.08, 129.32, 133.75, 134.78, 145.08,
151.70, 153.61, 168.75. HRMS (ESI) for [M + H]+: calcd
508.15283, found 508.15289.
NMR characterization
All the structures of synthesized compounds were determined
by 1H NMR, 13C NMR and HRMS (Supporting Information
Fig. S1–6). Among, the compound 1a was selected as the
model for structural characterization and its NMR spectra
were presented in Fig. 1.
According to the 1H NMR spectrum (Fig. 1a), signals at δ
1.01 (t, 3H), 1.73 (m, 2H), and 3.15 (m, 2H) were attributed to
protons in propyl and peaks at δ 3.78 (t, 1H) and 3.97 (t, 1H)
and 5.18 (d, 1H) due to the three hydrogens of hydroxyl, the
assignments of the remained eight saturated protons signals
attached at cyclopentane and ethylidene corresponding to the
rest of peaks at up-field ranging from 2.05 to 5.09 ppm.
Additionally, the four aromatic protons of phenyl were located
at 6.83~7.81 ppm and the presence of the phenolic hydroxyl at
9.68 ppm. Finally, the hydrogen signals at 8.19~8.43 ppm and
12.36~12.54 ppm were regarded as belonging to C3’H and
N1’H, respectively.
To verified rationality of the assignment of the three pro-
tons at the lowest field in Fig. 1a, D2O-exchange NMR exper-
iment was performed and the spectrum was depicted in Fig.
1b, where both the signals at 9.68 ppm and 12.36~12.54 ppm
were disappeared while the peaks at 8.19~8.43 ppm were
remained, which illustrated that peaks at the disappeared lo-
cation were correspondence with those of active hydrogens
9-[(1′R,2′S,3′S,4′S)-2′,3′-dihydroxyl-4′-hydroxyethoxy-
cyclopentane-1′-yl]-9H-2-propylthio-6-(3-nitrobenzaldehyde
hydrazone)-8-azapurine(1e) 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6):
δ (ppm) 1.01 (3H, t, CH3, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.73 (2H, m, CH2), 2.14
(1H, m, 5′-CH2), 2.69 (1H, m, 5′-CH2), 3.15 (2H, CH2), 3.53
(4H, m, CH2), 3.79 (1H, s, CH), 4.00 (1H, s, CH), 4.64 (2H, m,
CH, OH), 5.01–5.19 (3H, m, CH, OH), 7.70–7.76 (1H, m, Ph-
H), 8.21–8.24 (2H, m, Ph-H), 8.58, 8.68 (1H, =CH), 8.68 (1H,
s, Ph-H), 12.64, 12.82 (1H, NH). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-
d6): δ (ppm) 13.72, 22.75, 32.77, 33.62, 60.78, 61.08, 71.30,
74.25, 74.80, 82.26, 121.49, 122.87, 124.33, 130.70, 133.46,
136.67, 143.95, 148.61, 151.71, 153.62, 168.81. HRMS (ESI)
for [M + H]+: calcd 519.17688, found 519.17691.