314
RADBIL’ et al.
3 m; stationary phase tricresyl phosphate; column
EXPERIMENTAL
temperature 110 180 C; vaporizer temperature 250 C;
carrier gas nitrogen, flow rate 60 ml min . Tridecane
1
-Pinene and haloacetic acid were cooled to 5 C
and then carefully mixed, with warming up avoided,
and transferred to a temperature-controlled reactor
equipped with a heated jacket, a stirrer, and a reflux
was added as internal reference. The products were
identified by comparison with the corresponding ref-
erence compounds or by using data on relative reten-
condenser. The temperature in the reactor was main- tion of terpenoids [4]. The relative error of single
tained constant to within 0.5 C. The stirrer rotation analysis at a confidence level of 0.95 was within 2%.
rate was controlled with a tachometer. After a certain With each sample, five chromatograms were recorded,
time, the mixture was rapidly cooled, the reaction
products were washed with water, excess acid was
neutralized with 10% aqueous Na2CO3, and the mix-
ture was again washed with water to pH 7 and dried
over MgSO4, after which the products were analyzed
by GLC. In experiments without preliminary cooling
of the reactants, the acid was charged into the reactor
and heated with stirring to a certain temperature, after
which -pinene was added, which was regarded as
the start of the reaction.
and the results were averaged.
CONCLUSION
Reactions of -pinene with chloro-, bromo-, and
trichloroacetic acids yield terpene alcohols and esters,
which can be used as components or intermediates in
syntheses of active substances.
REFERENCES
Sodium hydroxide treatment of the product mix-
tures from reactions of -pinene with chloro- and
trichloroacetic acids was performed as follows. After
washing with water to pH 7 and drying over MgSO4,
the mixture was charged into a reactor. A twofold ex-
cess amount (by volume) of a 10% solution of NaOH
in ethanol was added. The mixture was refluxed for
2 h and cooled; the reaction products were extracted
with two portions of hexane. The combined extract
was washed with water to pH 7 and dried over
MgSO4. The solvent was removed, and the products
were analyzed by GLC.
1. Voitkevich, S.A., 865 dushistykh veshchestv dlya par-
fyumerii i bytovoi khimii (865 Aromatic Principles for
Perfumery and Domestic Chemistry), Moscow: Pishche-
vaya Prom st., 1994.
2. Sandermann, W., Naturharze Terpentinol Tallol.
Chemie und Technologie, Berlin: Springer, 1960.
3. Osadchii, S.A. and Tolstikov, G.A., Khim. Inter.
Ustoich. Razv., 1997, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 79 93.
4. Rudakov, G.A., Khimiya i tekhnologiya kamfary (Cam-
phor Chemistry and Technology), Moscow: Lesnaya
Prom st., 1976.
5. Li Shixin, Gu Shunchun, and Chen Chuanhe, Linchan
Huaxue Yu Gongye, 1984, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 10 19.
6. Markevich, R.M., Lamotkin, A.I., and Reznikov, V.M.,
Khim. Drev., 1985, no. 2, pp. 103 105.
7. Markevich, R.M., Lamotkin, A.I., and Reznikov, V.M.,
Khim. Drev., 1985, no. 3, pp. 106 108.
The chromatographic analysis was performed on a
Chrom-5 chromatograph (flame ionization detector;
3-m stainless steel column; stationary phase 15%
PFMS-4 silicone oil on Chromaton N-AW-DMSC,
0.20 0.25 mm; column temperature 110 180 C;
vaporizer temperature 250 C; carrier gas nitrogen,
8. Markevich, R.M., Lamotkin, A.I., and Reznikov, V.M.,
Khim. Drev., 1985, no. 5, pp. 96 101.
9. Popov, A.A. and Vyrodov, V.A., Gidrolizn. Lesokhim.
Prom st., 1979, no. 6, pp. 18 20.
1
flow rate 60 ml min ). Also, we performed analysis
under the same conditions as in [6]: column length
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED CHEMISTRY Vol. 75 No. 2 2002