January 2004
65
that methyl group is important on the R1 and R2 side chain. technical assistance.
Besides, another remarkable point of structure activity rela-
tionship of arylacetic and arylcarboxylic acid derivatives
noted in the –CH2 linkage between aromatic rings and the
amide group of side chain which exist only in arylacetic acid
derivatives. Nevertheless this group provides more flexibility
and bulkiness to the structure and can positively effect the in-
teraction of compounds with the enzyme active site and their
activity.
REFERENCES
1) Terrence R. B., Drugs of the Future, 17, 119—131 (1992).
2) Traxler P., Lydon N., Drugs of the Future, 20, 1261—1274 (1995).
3) Roussidis A. E., Karamanos N. K., In Vivo, 16, 459—470 (2002).
4) Klohs W. D., Fry D. W., Kraker A. J., Curr. Opin. Oncol., 9, 562—568
(1997).
5) Levitzki A., Gazit A., Science, 267, 1782—1788 (1995).
6) Traxler P., Furet P., Mett H., Buchdunger E., Meyer T., Lydon N., J.
Pharm. Belg., 52, 88—96 (1997).
7) Hamby J. M., Showalter H. D. H., Pharmacol. Ther., 82, 169—193
(1999).
CONCLUSIONS
While increasingly important characteristics of protein ty-
rosine kinase, especially a src family in such diseases as can-
cer and AIDS, there still a quite big challenge remains to de-
velop or find a site specific inhibitors of those enzymes. In
this paper, was investigated inhibitory activity of previously
synthesized arylacetic and arylcarboxylic acid derivatives
against p60c-Src tyrosine kinase by the ELISA method in vitro.
At the same time, docking mode between the inhibitors and
the enzyme was examined. It was found that the inhibitory
activity of compounds became higher when the –CH2 linkage
exists between aromatic ring and the amide group of the side
chain. Furthermore, the higher inhibitory activity was noted
for the compounds with the R1 and R2 substitutents being
methyl group in both series, The result of the docking study
by the use of DOCK 4.0 showed that compounds 2, 4, 7, 8,
11 render satisfactory interaction with the active site of en-
zyme, Lys295 of p60c-Src tyrosine kinase. Observation of the
docking interaction and the evaluation of biological data in-
dicated that compound 4 is the most active among the entire
derivatives.
8) Fabbro D., Parkinson D., Matter A., Curr. Opin. Pharmacol., 2, 374—
381 (2002).
9) Kenyon K. L., Garcia G. A., Med. Res. Rev., 7, 389—416 (1987).
10) Larson E. R., Fischer PH., “Annual Reports in Medicinal Chemistry,”
Vol. 24, ed. by Allen R. C., Academic Press Inc., San Diego, 1989, pp.
125—126.
11) Johnson R. J., Hertzberg R. P., “Annual Reports in Medicinal Chem-
istry,” Vol. 25, ed. by Bristol J. A., Academic Press Inc., San Diego,
1990, pp. 136—143.
12) Ewing T. J. A., DOCK4.0 User Manual, University of California, San
13) Taylor V. C., Buckley C. D., Douglas M., Cody A. J., Simmons D. L.,
Freeman S. D., J. Biol. Chem., 274, 11505—11512 (1999).
14) Kuntz I. D., Blaney J. M., Oatley S. J., Langridge R., Ferrin T. E., J.
Mol. Biol., 161, 269—288 (1982).
15) Nebioglu D., Altuntas T. G., Goker H., J. Fac. Pharm. Gazi, 10, 69—
81 (1993).
16) Ewing T. J. A., Makino S., Skillman A. G., Kuntz I. D., J. Comput.-
Aid. Mol. Des., 15, 411—428 (2001).
17) Taylor R. D., Jewsbury P. J., Essex J. W., J. Comp.-Aid. Mol. Des., 16,
151—166 (2002).
18) Illapakurthy A. C., Sabnis Y. A., Avery B. A., Avery M. A., Wyandt C.
M., J. Pharm. Sci., 92, 649—655 (2003).
19) Hanke J. H., Gardner J. P., Dow R. L., Changelian P. S., Brissette W.
H., Weringer E. J., Pollok B. A., Connelly P. A., J. Biol. Chem., 271,
695—701 (1996).
Acknowledgement The authors thank Dr. K. Suwa for