Struct Chem
J = 13.7 Hz (1H, ax-Ar–CH –Ar), 4.08 d, J = 13.3 Hz
2
NMR (CDCl ), d, ppm: 168.88, 153.41, 151.37, 150.87,
3
(
1H, ax-Ar–CH –Ar), 4.14 d, J = 14.8 Hz (1H, OCH ),
2
149.72, 146.81, 145.64, 145.49, 143.50, 142.43, 135.38,
134.53, 133.22, 132.66, 131.70, 131.62, 130.13, 128.21,
128.08, 126.75, 126.22, 125.72, 125.68, 125.61, 125.44,
125.22, 125.19, 125.16, 125.09, 124.76, 124.54, 77.20,
74.09, 62.82, 48.76, 34.21, 34.03, 33.84, 32.33, 31.80,
31.71, 31.45, 31.41, 31.17, 31.14, 31.09, 29.80, 23.62,
22.21, 10.46. Calculated, %: C 80.42, H 8.73, N 1.62.
C H NO . Found, %: C ? 80.51, H 8.60, N 1.73.
2
4
.18 d, J = 13.3 Hz (1H, ax-Ar–CH –Ar), 4.55 d,
2
J = 14.8 Hz (1H, OCH ), 5.12 m (1H, CH), 6.27 d,
2
J = 2.5 Hz (1H, ArH), 6.37 d, J = 2.5 Hz (1H, ArH),
6
.59–6.62 m (3H, PhH), 6.74 d, J = 8.5 Hz (1H, ArH),
.02 d, J = 2.4 Hz (1H, ArH), 7.06 dd, J = 2.4, 2.3 Hz
2H, ArH), 7.17–7.29 m (6H, OH ? PhH ? NH), 10.39 s
7
(
(
1
3
1H, C(O)NHC(O)). C NMR (CDCl ), d, ppm: 167.21,
3
58 75
5
1
1
1
1
1
3
6
%
59.39, 152.06, 150.76, 149.91, 149.63, 148.86, 147.20,
46.33, 144.03, 142.91, 142.17, 135.05, 134.78, 131.31,
31.26, 131.15, 128.71, 128.61, 128.18, 127.28, 127.02,
26.43, 126.00, 125.79, 125.68, 125.59, 125.34, 125.17,
24.95, 92.15, 75.30, 63.72, 48.91, 34.38, 33.90, 33.81,
3.56, 31.67, 31.46, 30.87, 30.72, 21.47. Calculated, %: C
8.80, H 6.87, Cl 10.50, N 2.77. C H Cl N O . Found,
5
2
1
,11,17,23-Tetra-tert-butyl-25-methoxy-26,28-dipropoxy-
7-(1-phenylethyl)aminocarbonylmethoxycalix[4]arene
1
7
Yield 0.078 g (8.7 %). M.p. 208–211 °C. H NMR
(CDCl ), d, ppm: 0.70 t, J = 7.2 Hz (3H, CH CH ), 0.86 t,
3
2
3
J = 7.2 Hz (3H, CH CH ), 0.87 s (9H, t-Bu), 0.90 s (9H,
2
3
t-Bu), 1.31 s (9H, t-Bu), 1.324 s (9H, t-Bu), 1.60 m (4H,
CH CH ), 1.71 d, J = 7.2 Hz (3H, CH CH), 3.22 d,
J = 13.0 Hz (3H, e-Ar–CH –Ar), 3.27 d, J = 13.0 Hz
5
8
69
3 2 7
2
3
3
: C 69.01, H 6.75, Cl 10.42, N 2.86.
2
Alkylation of calixarenecarbamate 7 (cS) The solution of
.00 g (0.988 mmol) of calix[4]arene 7 (cS) and 0.095 g
3.95 mmol) of NaH in 28 ml DMFA was stirred at room
temperature for 3 h. To the reaction mixture 0.304 g
0.225 ml, 2.469 mmol) of propylbromide was added and
stirred at 65 °C for 48 h. The mixture was poured into
00 ml of cold 5 % solution of HCl. The mixture was kept
(1H, e-Ar–CH –Ar), 3.50 s (3H, OCH ), 3.56 m (4H,
2
3
1
OCH CH ), 4.17 d, J = 13.0 Hz (1H, a-Ar–CH –Ar),
2 2 2
(
4.193 d, J = 13.0 Hz (1H, a-Ar–CH –Ar), 4.40 d,
2
J = 13.0 Hz (1H, a-Ar–CH –Ar), 4.41 d, J = 13.0 Hz
2
(
(1H, a-Ar–CH –Ar), 4.76 d, J = 15.6 Hz (1H, OCH
2
2
C(O)), 5.09 d, J = 15.6 Hz (1H, OCH C(O)), 5.52 m (1H,
2
1
CH), 6.52 m (4H, PhH), 7.08 s (2H, PhH), 7.09 s (2H,
PhH), 7.342 m (5H, PhH), 8.20 d, J = 8.6 Hz (1H, NH).
at 5 °C for 1 h, the liquid was decanted, the solid was
extracted with chloroform (3 9 15 ml), the organic phase
was washed with water (30 ml). After drying over Na SO
2
4
Details of calculations
chloroform was removed under reduced pressure. The
residue was treated with hexane (2 9 15 ml), and the
solvent was removed under reduced pressure. Reaction
products 16 and 17 were separated with the column chro-
matography on approx. 40 g silica gel, eluent ethylacetate–
hexane (1:5).
All the structures were first optimized using the TUR-
BOMOLE program set (version 6.4) [30], and the
implemented resolution of identity (RI) [31–33] algo-
rithm. The RI-B97-D functional [34] and standard triple-
zeta basis sets [35] (TZVP) were used. The contraction of
the basis functions was (14s9p)/[5s4p] ? {73,211/6111}
for S, (11s6p)/[5s3p] ? {62,111/411} for s, N, O and F
and (5s)/[3s] ? {311} for H. One set of (five) d-functions
was added for every non-hydrogen atom, and one set of
p-functions was used for H’s. For all the structures
vibrational analyses were performed computing numeri-
cally first- and second-order derivatives, checking the
equilibrium structures to be true local minima in energy.
No imaginary frequencies were found for the optimized
structures. For the calculation of DE and DG values, zero-
point energy and chemical potential, respectively, were
added to the total energy magnitudes using default scal-
ing. The solvent effects were taken into account using the
COSMO routine [36–38] implemented into the TURBO-
MOLE set of programs. For the COSMO-derived total
energy values correction magnitudes computed at the gas-
phase approximation were employed. The optimized
structures were pictured using the Jmol program [39].
5
,11,17,23-Tetra-tert-butyl-25-hydroxy-26-methoxy-27-
propoxy-28-(1-phenylethyl)aminocarbonylmethoxycalix
1
[
4]arene 16 Yield 0.372 g (43 %), m.p. 209–211 °C. H
NMR (CDCl ), d, ppm: 0.87 s (9H, t-Bu), 0.97 s (9H, t-
3
Bu), 1.02 t, J = 7.5 Hz (3H, CH CH ), 1.27 s (9H,t-Bu),
2
3
1
.31 s (9H, t-Bu), 1.70 d, J = 6.5 Hz (3H, CH CH ),
2 3
2
.09 m (2H, CH CH ), 3.08 d, J = 13.5 Hz (1H, eq-Ar–
2
3
CH –Ar), 3.23 d, J = 12.5 Hz (1H, Ar-eq-CH –Ar), 3.256
2
2
d, J = 12.4 Hz (1H, Ar-eq-CH –Ar), 3.38 d, J = 13.8 Hz
2
(
1H, Ar-eq-CH –Ar), 3.91 s (3H, OCH ), 3.92 m (2H,
2 3
OCH CH ), 4.05 d, J = 15.2 Hz (1H, OCH C(O)), 4.06 d,
2
2
2
J = 13.8 Hz (1H, ax-Ar–CH –Ar), 4.13 d, J = 13.5 Hz
2
(
1H, ax-Ar–CH –Ar), 4.36 d, J = 12.5 Hz (1H, Ar-ax-
2
CH –Ar), 4.38 d, J = 12.4 Hz (1H, Ar-ax-CH –Ar), 4.75
2
2
d, J = 15.2 Hz (1H, OCH C(O)), 5.31 m (1H, CH),
2
6
.63 m (3H, PhH), 6.75 d, J = 2.4 Hz (1H, PhH), 6.84 d,
J = 2.4 Hz (1H, PhH), 7.07 m (6H, PhH), 7.37 s (1H,
1
3
OH), 7.37 m (1H, PhH), 9.01 d J = 7.4 Hz (1H, NH).
C
123