Selective fluorination of pyridines
Russ.Chem.Bull., Int.Ed., Vol. 65, No. 7, July, 2016
1803
3
JHH = 8.58 Hz, 3JHF = 9.24 Hz); 7.52 (d, 1 H, 3JHH = 7.54 Hz).
F NMR (DMSOꢀd ), δ: –128.4 (cf. Ref. 25: δ –125.6).
19F
6
over sodium metal. After purification, the solvents were stored
19
under dry argon atmosphere. The supporting salt Et NBF was
4
4
1
recrystallized from ethanol and dried for 2 days in a vacuum
cabinet at 100 °C. Pyridine and 4ꢀethylpyridine, potassium
hexafluoronickelate, and tetramethylammonium fluoride were
obtained from Aldrich, boron trifluoride was obtained from Alfa
Aesar, silver nitrate and cesium fluoride were obtained from
Strem Chemicals. All syntheses were performed under dry argon
atmosphere.
4ꢀEthylꢀ3ꢀfluoropyridine (4). H NMR (CDСl ), δ: 8.37 (d, 1 H,
3
3
3JHH = 5.05 Hz); 8.29 (m, 1 H); 7.27 (d, 1 H, J = 7.12 Hz);
2.74 (q, 2 H, CH , J
= 7.63 Hz) (cf. Ref. 26). F NMR (CDСl ), δ: –128.4.
HF
3
3
= 7.63 Hz); 1.26 (t, 3 H, CH , J
=
HH
2
HH
3
19
3
This work was financially supported by the Russian
Science Foundation (Project No. 14ꢀ23ꢀ00016).
Preparative electrolyses were performed using a B5ꢀ49 diꢀ
rectꢀcurrent power supply in a 40ꢀmL threeꢀelectrode cell. The
potential of the working electrode was recorded using a V7ꢀ27
References
directꢀcurrent voltmeter versus an Ag/0.01 M AgNO reference
3
electrode in acetonitrile. The working surface of a platinum cyꢀ
1. F. Dollé, Curr. Pharm. Des., 2005, 11, 3221.
lindrical anode serving as the working electrode was equal to
2. (a) J. A. McCarron, V. W. Pike, C. Halldin, J. Sandell,
J. Sóvágó, B. Gulyas, Z. Cselényi, H. V. Wikström, S. Marꢀ
chaisꢀOberwinkler, B. Nowicki, F. Dollé, L. Farde, Mol.
Imaging Biol. 2004, 6, 17; (b) V. W. Pike, Trends Pharmacol.
Sci., 2009, 30, 431.
3. V. A. Petrov, Fluorinated Heterocyclic Compounds: Synthesis,
Chemistry, and Applications; John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken,
2009, 533 p.
2
2
9
0.0 cm . The diaphragm was a ceramic plate with a pore size of
00 nm. The cathode was a platinum gauze and the catholyte
was a saturated solution of PyHBF in acetonitrile. During the
4
electrolysis, the electrolyte was magnetically stirred under the
constant stream of argon passed through a drying system.
NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AVANCEꢀ400
1
19
(
400.1 MHz ( H) and 376.5 MHz ( F)) spectrometers. Proton
chemical shifts were recorded using residual protons of a deuterꢀ
ated solvent as the internal standard and 19F chemical shifts
4. (a) P. S. Fier, J. F. Hartwig, Science, 2013, 342, 956; (b) P. S.
Fier, J. F. Hartwig, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 10139.
5. (a) H. Sun, S. G. DiMagno, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006,
45, 2720; (b) T. Fukuhara, N. Yoneda, A. Suzuki, J. Fluorine
Chem., 1988, 38, 435; (c) S. D. Kuduk, R. M. DiPardo,
M. G. Bock, Org.Lett., 2005, 7, 577.
6. (a) L. Dolci, F. Dollé, S. Jubeau, F. Vaufrey, J. Crouzel,
J. Labelled Compd. Radiopharm., 1999, 42, 975; (b) M. Karꢀ
ramkam, F. Hinnen, F. Vaufrey, F. Dollé, J. Labelled Compd.
Radiopharm., 2003, 46, 979.
were recorded relative to C F (δ –164.9).
19F
6
6
In voltammetric studies, the working electrode was a staꢀ
tionary disc glassy carbon electrode with a working surface area
2
of 8 mm and a platinum electrode with a working surface area
2
of 3.14 mm . Voltammograms were recorded on a BASi Epsilon
potentiostat. The curves were recorded at the potential linear
scan rate of 100 mV s–1. The reference electrode upon voltꢀ
ammetric measurements was Ag/0.01 M AgNO in acetonitrile.
3
The auxiliary electrode was a platinum wire with a diameter of
7. (a) D. E. Olberg, J. M. Arukwe, D. Grace, O. K. Hjelstuꢀ
en, M. Solbakken, G. M. Kindberg, A. Cuthbertson, J. Med.
Chem., 2010, 53, 1732; (b) F. Dollé, L. Dolci, H. Valette,
F. Hinnen, F. Vaufrey, I. Guenther, C. Fuseau, C. Couꢀ
lon, M. Bottlaender, C. Crouzel, J. Med. Chem., 1999,
42, 2251; (c) Y.ꢀS. Ding, N. Liu, T. Wang, J. Marecek,
V. Garza, I. Ojima, J. S. Fowler, Nucl. Med. Biol., 2000,
27, 381.
1
mm and a length of 10 mm. The measurements were perꢀ
formed in a temperatureꢀcontrolled (25 °C) cell in argon atmoꢀ
sphere. Cyclic voltammograms were recorded in MeCN at the
–
3
–1
substrate concentration of 5•10 mol L against Bu NBF4
4
–
1
–1
(1•10 mol L ).
Electrolysis (general procedure). Pyridine or 4ꢀethylpyridine
6.2 mmol), the source of F– ions (CsF, Ме NF, or CoF ,
(
4
3
6
.2 mmol), and the catalyst (K NiF , CoF , or AgNO , 0.62 mmol)
8. (a) J. A. Bull, J. J. Mousseau, G. Pelletier, A. B. Charette,
Chem. Rev., 2012, 112, 2642; (b) C. Liu, J. Luo, L. Xu,
Z. Huo, ARKIVOC, 2013, Part (i), 154; (c) J. J. Yin, B. P. Xiang,
M. A. Huffman, C. E. Raab, I. W. Davies, J. Org. Chem.,
2007, 72, 4554; (d) J. M. Keith, J. Org. Chem., 2008, 73, 327;
(e) J. M. Keith, J. Org. Chem., 2010, 75, 2722; (f) A. T.
Londregan, S. Jennings, L. Q. Wei, Org. Lett., 2010, 12,
5254; (g) A. T. Londregan, S. Jennings, L. Q. Wei, Org. Lett.,
2011, 13, 1840; (h) S. E. Wengryniuk, A. Weickgenannt,
C. Reiher, N. A. Strotman, K. Chen, M. D. Eastgate, P. S.
Baran, Org. Lett., 2013, 15, 792; (i) R. P. Farrell, M. V. Silva
Elipe, M. D. Bartberger, J. S. Tedrow, F. Vounatsos, Org.
Lett., 2013, 15, 168.
2
6
3
3
in acetonitrile (20 mL) were placed in an electrochemical cell.
The electrolysis was performed with division of the anode and
cathode compartments with stirring on a magnetic stirrer under
the constant flow of argon. Electricity of 2 F per 1 mol of the
starting pyridine (333 mA h) was passed through the electrolyte.
Once the electrolysis has been completed, the reaction mixture
was passed through silica gel and the solvent was removed. The
residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel
(
the eluents were CH Cl and pentane).
2 2
1
2
ꢀFluoropyridine (1). H NMR (DMSOꢀd ), δ: 8.29 (d, 1 H,
6
3JHH = 5.85 Hz); 8.02 (dt, 1 H, J = 7.98 Hz, J = 1.25 Hz);
3
4
HH
HF
.38 (dd, 1 H, 3J = 7.28 Hz, J = 4.91 Hz); 7.20 (dd, 1 H,
3
7
HH HH
3
JHH = 7.54 Hz, 3J
19
= 2.58 Hz) (cf. Ref. 22). F NMR
patents/EP0619307A1?cl=en&hl=ru.
HF
(
19F
DMSOꢀd ), δ: –65.88 (cf. Ref. 23: δ –69.5).
6
1
4
ꢀEthylꢀ2ꢀfluoropyridine (2). H NMR (CDСl ), δ: 8.10
10. (a) E. Rivadeneira, K. Jelich, Eur. Pat. EP 556683, 1993;
(b) E. Rivadeneira, K. Jelich, Pat. US 5502194, 1996;
http://www.google.com/patents/US5502194; (c) A. Johansꢀ
son, T. Svensson, Pat. WO/2001/070730, 2001; http://
www.google.com/patents/WO2001070730A1?cl=en.
3
3
(
d, 1 H, J = 5.05 Hz); 6.97 (m, 1 H); 6.72 (s, 1 H); 2.67 (q, 2 H,
HH
3
3
CH , J
= 7.61 Hz); 1.24 (t, 3 H, CH , J
= 7.61 Hz)
2
HH
3
HH
19
(
cf. Ref. 24). F NMR (CDСl ), δ: –69.8.
3
1
3
ꢀFluoropyridine (3). H NMR (DMSOꢀd ), δ: 8.61 (d, 1 H,
6
3JHF = 5.85 Hz); 8.49 (d, 1 H, J
3
= 4.98 Hz); 7.72 (dd, 1 H,
HH