C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
of active propagating species 2 is lowered via equilibrium with the
dormant propagating species 3, thereby reducing side reactions (e.g.,
step-growth polymerization, deprotonation) and enhancing control
of polymer MW and PDI. In support of this hypothesis, when
polymerizations were conducted in a solvent that can better stabilize
the zwitterionic species [e.g., dimethyl formamide (DMF)], control
of the polymer MW was significantly compromised, and only low-
MW polymers were obtained regardless of the initial monomer/
initiator ratio.
from this study will guide the optimization of reaction conditions
to ultimately produce high-MW cyclic poly(R-peptoid)s with 99+%
purity.
Acknowledgment. D.Z. thanks Dr. Rafael Cueto for assisting
with the SEC studies and Dr. Dan Pu for conducting the MALDI-
TOF MS experiments. This work was supported by LSU and the
Louisiana Board of Regents (LEQSF-RD-A-11).
12
1
Supporting Information Available: H NMR and ESI MS spectra
1
of a low-MW spirocyclic NHC-poly(N-Bu-glycine) adduct; H NMR
and MALDI TOF MS spectra of a low-MW cyclic poly(N-Bu-glycine);
MALDI TOF MS spectrum of a low-MW poly(N-Bu-glycine) sample
1
obtained from NHC 1-mediated polymerization of M
C{ H} spectra of M
1
in DMF; H and
1
3
1
1 2
and M monomers, high-MW cyclic poly-
(
N-Bu-glycine), cyclic poly(N-Me-glycine), and cyclic poly(N-Me-
glycine)-b-poly(N-Bu-glycine) block copolymer; SEC chromatograms
of polymer samples prior to and after heterochain-extension experiments
for cyclic block copoly(R-peptoid) synthesis; cyclic poly(N-Bu-glycine)
MW and PDI data using calibration curves constructed with polystyrene
standards; poly(N-Bu-glycine) MW and PDI data for polymerizations
conducted in DMF; and Mark-Houwink-Sakurada plots for cyclic
and linear poly(N-Bu-glycine) and poly(N-Me-glycine)-b-poly(N-Bu-
glycine), with and without band-broadening corrections for MWs, and
the corresponding logarithmic plots of MW versus elution volume. This
material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
Figure 4. Mark-Houwink-Sakurada plot of cyclic (0) and linear (O)
poly(N-Me-glycine)-b-poly(N-Bu-glycine) block copolymers with identical
compositions and their linearly fit curves (dashed line, cyclic; solid line,
linear).
References
The utility of this reaction for accessing cyclic block copoly-
R-peptoid)s was demonstrated through the synthesis of a poly(N-
(
1) Patch, J. A.; Barron, A. E. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2002, 6, 872–877.
2) Barron, A. E.; Zuckermann, R. N. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1999, 3, 681–
(
(
6
87.
Me-glycine)-b-poly(N-Bu-glycine) block copolymer by sequential
(
3) Baldauf, C.; G u¨ nther, R.; Hofmann, H.-J. Phys. Biol. 2006, 3, S1–S9.
N
N
addition of Me-NCA ([M
2
]
0
/[1]
0
) 50:1) and Bu-NCA ([M
1
]
0
/
(4) (a) Wu, C. W.; Kirshenbaum, K.; Sanborn, T. J.; Patch, J. A.; Huang, K.;
Dill, K. A.; Zuckermann, R. N.; Barron, A. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
[
1] )25:1). Both steps were allowed to reach completion. SEC
0
1
25, 13525–13530. (b) Sanborn, T. J.; Wu, C. W.; Zuckermann, R. N.;
analyses of polymers obtained prior to and after the second
monomer addition revealed an increase of polymer MW from 4.4
Barron, A. E. Biopolymers 2002, 63, 12–20. (c) Wu, C. W.; Sanborn, T. J.;
Zuckermann, R. N.; Barron, A. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2958–
2
963. (d) Wu, C. W.; Sanborn, T. J.; Huang, K.; Zuckermann, R. N.; Barron,
kg mol- (PDI ) 1.04) to 6.5 kg mol (PDI ) 1.03), in agreement
1
-1
A. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6778–6784.
-1
7
(5) (a) Waley, S. G.; Watson, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1948, 70, 2299–2300. (b)
Ballard, D. G. H.; Bamford, C. H. J. Chem. Soc. 1958, 355–360. (c) Waley,
S. G.; Watson, J. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 1949, 199, 499–517. (d)
Bamford, C. H.; Block, H.; Mason, D.; Openshaw, A. W. SCI Monogr.
with the theoretically predicted value (M ) 6.4 kg mol ).
n
Extraction of the copolymer product with water did not yield any
poly(N-Me-glycine) homopolymers, suggesting 100% living chains
1966, 20, 304–313. (e) Sisido, M.; Imanishi, Y.; Higashimura, T. Makromol.
1
13
1
in the first polymerization step. H and C{ H} NMR spectra of
Chem. 1977, 178, 3107–3114. (f) Kricheldorf, H. R.; B o¨ singer, K.
Makromol. Chem. 1976, 177, 1243–1258. (g) Kricheldorf, H. R.; von
Lossow, C.; Schwarz, G. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2004, 205, 918–924. (h)
Kricheldorf, H. R.; von Lossow, C.; Schwarz, G.; Fritsch, D. Macromol.
Chem. Phys. 2005, 206, 1165–1170. (i) Kricheldorf, H. R.; von Lossow,
C.; Schwarz, G. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2006, 44, 4680–
the purified polymers were consistent with the diblock copoly-
7
(
R-peptoid) backbone structure. SEC analysis of these block
copolymer samples also revealed that the polymers exhibit lower
7
intrinsic viscosities than their linear analogues (Figure 4). The
4
695. (j) Kricheldorf, H. R.; von Lossow, C.; Schwarz, G. Macromolecules
2
005, 38, 5513–5518. (k) Kricheldorf, H. R.; von Lossow, C.; Lomadze,
Mark-Houwink exponents for the cyclic and linear block copoly-
N.; Schwarz, G. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2008, 46, 4012–
4
mers are 0.51(4) and 0.57(9), implying self-avoiding-walk confor-
020.
1
1
mations for both polymers. The [η]cyclic/[η]linear ratio [0.84(5)]
suggests that the former polymers are mostly cyclic, although the
presence of residual linear contaminants cannot be completely ruled
out. Furthermore, the cyclic polymers also eluted later than their
(6) (a) Culkin, D. A.; Jeong, W.; Csihony, S.; Gomez, E. D.; Palsara, N. P.;
Hedrick, J. L.; Waymouth, R. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 2627–
2
630. (b) Jeong, W.; Hedrick, J. L.; Waymouth, R. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2007, 129, 8414–8415. (c) Jeong, W.; Shin, E. J.; Culkin, D. A.; Hedrick,
J. L.; Waymouth, R. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 4884–4891. (d)
Raynaud, J.; Absalon, C.; Gnanou, Y.; Taton, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009,
131, 3201–3209.
7
linear analogues with identical MWs. This implies a smaller
(
(
7) Refer to the Supporting Information for full characterization details.
8) Bloomfield, V.; Zimm, B. H. J. Chem. Phys. 1966, 44, 315–323.
hydrodynamic volume for the former, assuming the absence of non-
size-exclusion separation mechanisms.
(9) (a) Roovers, J. In Cyclic Polymers, 2nd ed.; Semlyen, J. A., Ed.; Kluwer
Academic: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2000; pp 347-384. (b) Endo, K.
AdV. Polym. Sci. 2008, 217, 121–183.
In summary, we have demonstrated that cyclic poly(R-peptoid)s
can be synthesized with controlled polymer MWs and narrow MW
distributions in high purity from an NHC-mediated ROP of
N-substituted N-carboxylanhydride. The reaction exhibits charac-
teristics of a living polymerization with minimal chain transfer and
hence allows for the facile synthesis of cyclic diblock copoly-
(10) Jang, S. S.; Cagin, T.; Goddard, W. A. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 19, 1843–
1
854.
(
11) (a) Hiemenz, P. C.; Lodge, T. P. Polymer Chemistry, 2nd ed.; CRC Press:
Boca Raton, FL 2007; pp 241-242, 334-341. (b) Rubinstein, M.; Colby,
R. H. Polymer Physics; Oxford University Press: New York, 2003; pp 102-
1
04.
(12) Reactions in DMF were conducted at room temperature to inhibit the
solvent-induced polymerization pathway discussed in ref 5j.
(
R-peptoid)s through sequential monomer addition. Elucidation of
the reaction mechanism is currently in progress. Insights obtained
JA907380D
1
8074 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 9 VOL. 131, NO. 50, 2009