Notes and references
1 A. Zukauskas, M. S. Shur and R. Caska, Introduction to
Solid-State Lighting, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2002.
eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:076:0003:0016:DE:PDF;
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:
Action.do?reference=IP/08/1909;
news/worldnews/europe/3174452/Traditional-lightbulbs-banned-by-
accessed Nov. 10th 2009).
3 J. L. Sommerdijk, A. Bril and A. W. de Jager, J. Lumin., 1974, 8,
341; W. W. Piper, J. A. DeLuca and F. S. Ham, J. Lumin., 1974, 8,
344.
Fig. 5 Emission spectra of GdF3 : Eu3+ 10% and 5% nanocrystals
upon excitation into the 6PJ and 6GJ Gd3+ levels recorded at RT. The
4 R. Pappalardo, J. Lumin., 1976, 14, 159.
5
7
spectra were normalized for D1 - FJ emission.
5 R. T. Wegh, H. Donker, U. D. Oskam and A. Meijerink, Science,
1999, 283, 663; R. T. Wegh, H. Donker, U. D. Oskam and
A. Meijerink, J. Lumin., 1999, 82, 93.
Fig. 5 presents the emission spectra of 5 and 10 mol%
Eu3+-doped samples excited by high energy synchrotron
radiation. Due to the quantum cutting effect the ratio of the
5D0 - 7FJ/5D1 - 7FJ peaks increases by a factor of up to 1.5.
Judging from the intensity ratios the cross-relaxation probability
is B25% for the 10 mol% Eu3+-doped sample and B45% for
the 5% mol Eu3+-doped sample, yielding a quantum efficiency
of about 125% and 145%, respectively. These values are
astonishingly high when taking the extremely small particle size
into account. While in the bulk materials a quantum yield close
to the theoretical maximum of 200% can be observed (B170%
for GdF3 :Eu3+),5 with smaller particle size and rising surface
area a drastic reduction of the quantum yield due to surface
quenching is expected. Maybe for this reason and the experi-
mental difficulties in synthesizing uniform LnF3 particles, almost
no reports on quantum cutters on the nanoscale exist. However,
for GdF3 :Eu3+ nanorods of substantially larger size than our
particles (length 60–200 nm, diameter 18–20 nm) a quantum
yield close to the bulk material has been suggested.15
6 X. Wang, J. Zhuang, Q. Peng and Y. Li, Inorg. Chem., 2006, 45,
6661.
7 R. Yan and Y. Li, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2005, 15, 763.
8 J.-L. Lemyre and A. M. Ritcey, Chem. Mater., 2005, 17, 3040.
9 M. Wang, Q. Huang, J. Hong, X. Chen and Z. Xue, Cryst. Growth
Des., 2006, 6, 1972.
10 J. H. Davis, Jr, in ACS Symp. Ser. 818, ed. R. D. Rogers and
K. R. Seddon, ACS, Washington, 2002, pp. 247–259; Ionic Liquids
in Synthesis, ed. P. Wasserscheid and T. Welton, Wiley-VCH,
New York, 2008; A. E. Visser, R. P. Swatloski, W. M. Reichert,
R. Mayton, S. Sheff, A. Wierzbicki, J. H. Davis, Jr and
R. D. Rogers, Chem. Commun., 2001, 135–136; E. D. Bates,
R. D. Mayton, I. Ntai and J. H. Davis, Jr, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2002, 124, 926; J. Davis, Jr, Chem. Lett., 2004, 33, 1072–1077.
11 A. Taubert, Acta Chim. Slov., 2005, 52, 183; A. Taubert and
L. Zhonghao, Dalton Trans., 2007, 723; M. Antonietti,
D. Kuang, B. Smarsly and Y. Zhou, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2004, 43, 4988; M. Antonietti, B. Smarsly and Y. Zhou, in Ionic
Liquids in Synthesis, ed. P. Wasserscheid and T. Welton,
Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2008, ch. 6.
12 Ionic Liquids, ed. P. Wasserscheid and T. Welton, Wiley-VCH,
New York, 2002; A. R. Sethi, P. Smith, N. Srinivasan and
T. Welton, Ionic Liquids as Solvents for Organic Synthesis, NATO
Science Series, II: Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry, 2003,
92, 457; D. Bradley, P. Dyson and T. Welton, Chem. Rev.
(Deddington, UK), 2000, 9, 18; T. Welton, Chem. Rev., 1999, 99,
2071.
In conclusion, in this work we describe a fast and facile
access to pure, oxygen free, small size (B6 nm), polycrystalline
GdF3 : Eu3+ nanoparticles via microwave synthesis. Here, the
ionic liquid not only serves as the synthesis medium but also as
a fluoride source, hence, the reaction partner. Quantum yields
as high as 145% can be obtained which renders these materials
of great interest for optical applications.
13 It has to be noted that our synthetic approach is different from the
MAIL (microwave ionic liquid assisted) method which makes use
of adding a small amount of IL to a conventional solvent to
enhance its susceptibility to microwave radiation, cf.: X.-G. Zhu,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 1410; G. Buhler and
¨
C. Feldmann, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 4864.
14 A. Zalkin and D. H. Templeton, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1953, 75, 2453;
O. Greis and T. Petzel, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 1974, 403, 1.
15 R. Hua, J. Niu, B. Chen, M. Li, T. Yu and W. Li, Nanotechnology,
2006, 17, 1642.
The authors would like to acknowledge support from the
European Research Council CRC through an ERC Starting
Grant (‘‘EMIL’’, contract no. 2008) and the HASYLAB
(proposal no. II-20090181).
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 571–573 | 573