Page 3 of 4
Journal Name
ChemComm
DOI: 1C0.O10M39M/CU5CNCI0C0A72T3IOB N
a
b
Total yield of 2aa and 3aa. The ratio was determined by NMR
[RhCl(coe)2]2 (10 mol%)
L1 (24 mol%)
analysis. c Ee of 2aa. d Alkene (10 equiv) was added.
(10 equiv)
t-Bu
The present reaction was sensitive to the bulkiness around the
silicon atom (Scheme 3). Both the yield and ee decreased as the
Ge
Me2
H
Fe
Fe
GeHMe2
toluene, 135 °C, 6 h
substituents
(R)
increase
in
size.
2ꢀ
4
5: 40%, 33% ee
(Diphenylhydrosilyl)phenylferrocene (1ad) was transformed into the
corresponding benzosiloloferrocene 2ad in good yield, but the ee
was low.
Scheme 4 Reaction of 2-(dimethylhydrogermyl)phenyl-
ferrocene (4)
[RhCl(coe)2]2 (10 mol%)
L1 (24 mol%)
In conclusion, we first prepared ferroceneꢀfused benzosiloles
and benzogermole by enantioselective and intramolecular cross
dehydrogenative coupling of an sp2 CꢀH bond of ferrocene with
a SiꢀH or GeꢀH bond. We will evaluate the potential of a new
class of planarꢀchiral molecules as electronic organic materials.
(10 equiv)
t-Bu
Si
H
Fe
Fe
R2
SiHR2
toluene, 135 °C, 24 h
1ab (R = n-Bu)
1ac (R = i-Pr)
1ad (R = Ph)
2ab: 51%, 50% ee
2ac: 39%, 18% ee
2ad: 74%, 26% ee
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by GrantꢀinꢀAid for Scientific Research on
Innovative Areas, “Molecular Activation Directed toward
Straightforward Synthesis,” MEXT and JST, ACTꢀC, Japan.
Scheme 3 Effect of substituents on the silicon atom
We checked the substrate scope by introducing several
Notes and references
a
substituents
on
the
benzene
ring
of
2ꢀ
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, School of Advanced
(dimethylhydrosilyl)phenylferrocene (Table 4). Both of electronꢀ
Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Shinjuku, Tokyo 169ꢀ8555,
donating and –withdrawing groups could be installed into the paraꢀ Japan, Fax: (+81) 3ꢀ5286ꢀ8098; eꢀmail: tshibata@waseda.jp
b JST, ACTꢀC, 4ꢀ1ꢀ8 Honcho, Kawaguchi, Saitama 332ꢀ0012, Japan.
and metaꢀpositions with respect to the silyl group: moderate yield
† Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: [details of any
and good ee were achieved (Entries 1ꢀ5). A methyl group at the 3ꢀ
supplementary information available should be included here]. See
position slightly affected the enantioselectivity (Entry 6).
Introduction adjacent to the silyl group gave a poor ee (Entry 7)
DOI: 10.1039/c000000x/
1
2
For recent reviews, see: (
a
) M. Shimizu and T. Hiyama, Synlett,
Table 4 Substrate scope of 2-(dimethylhydrosilyl)aryl-
2012, 23, 973; (
b
) J. Y. Corey, Adv. Organomet. Chem., 2011, 59,
ferrocenes
181.
R
(
a
) M. Shimizu, K. Mochida and T. Hiyama, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2008, 47, 9760; asymmetric variant; ( ) R. Shintani, H. Otomo, K.
Ota and T. Hayashi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 7305.
Y. Yabusaki, N. Ohshima, H. Kondo, T. Kusamoto, Y. Yamanoi and
H. Nishihara, Chem. Eur. J., 2010, 16, 5581.
) T. Matsuda, S. Kadowaki, T. Goya and M. Murakami, Org. Lett.,
2007, , 133; asymmetric variant: ( ) R. Shintani, C. Takagi, T. Ito,
M. Naito and K. Nozaki, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 1616.
4
[RhCl(coe)2]2 (10 mol%)
3
R
b
5
L1 (24 mol%)
3
4
(10 equiv)
6
t-Bu
Si
Me2
H
Fe
Fe
–
SiHMe2
toluene, 135 °C, time
(a
9
b
1ba-1ha
2ba-2ha
5
6
7
T. Ureshino, T. Yoshida, Y. Kuninobu and K. Takai, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2010, 132, 14324.
Y. Kuninobu, K. Yamauchi, N. Tamura, T. Seiki and K. Takai,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 1520.
Entry
R
Time (h) Yield (%)a
2:3b
Ee (%)c
74
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
4ꢀMe (1ba)
4ꢀCF3 (1ca)
5ꢀMe (1da)
5ꢀCF3 (1ea)
5ꢀOCF3 (1fa)
3,5ꢀMe2 (1ga)
6ꢀMe (1ha)
24
4
56
55
44
53
55
75
67
1:0.11
1:0.14
1:0.06
1:0.17
1:0.16
1:0.13
1:0.09
Reviews of planarꢀchiral ferrocenes, see: (
H. Lang, Organometallics, 2013, 32, 5668; (b) S. Arae and M.
Ogasawara, Tetrahedron Lett., 2015, 56 in press
(doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2015.01.130).
) D.ꢀW. Gao, Y.ꢀC. Shi, Q. Gu, Z.ꢀL. Zhao and S.ꢀL. You, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 86; ( ) C. Pi, Y. Li, X. Cui, H. Zhang, Y.
Han and Y. Wu, Chem. Sci., 2013, , 2675; (c) Y.ꢀC. Shi, R.ꢀF.
Yang, D.ꢀW. Gao and S.ꢀL. You, Beil. J. Org. Chem., 2013, , 1891.
T. Shibata and T. Shizuno, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 5410.
a) D. Schaarschmidt and
78
4
86
,
9
80
8
9
(a
2
76
b
4
5
55
9
24
5
a Total yield of 2 and 3. b The ratio was determined by NMR
10 S. Siegel and H. Schmalz, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1997, 36, 2456.
11 ( ) R. Deng, Y. Huang, X. Ma, G. Li, R. Zhu, B. Wang, Y.ꢀB. Kang
and Z. Gu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 4472; ( ) D.ꢀW. Gao, Q.
Yin, Q. Gu, and S.ꢀL. You, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 4841; (
analysis. c Ee of 2.
a
b
c
)
The reaction of (dimethylhydrogermyl)phenylferrocene (4) also
proceeded to afford benzogermoloferrocene 5 (Scheme 4).21 The low
yield and ee were probably due to the bulkiness of a germanium
atom compared with a silicon atom.
L. Liu, A.ꢀA. Zhang, R.ꢀJ. Zhao, F. Li, T.ꢀJ. Meng, N. Ishida, M.
Murakami and W.ꢀX. Zhao, Org. Lett., 2014, 16, 5336.
12 Only an example of the asymmetric synthesis of heteroleꢀfused
ferrocenes by diastereoselective reaction: S. Yasuike, J. Hagiwara,
H. Danjo, M. Kawahata, N. Kakusawa, K. Yamaguchi and J. Kurita,
Heterocycles, 2009, 78, 3001.
13 (a) K.G. Rutherford and W. Redmond, Org. Synth., 1963, 43, 12; (b)
W. F. Little, C. N. Reilley, J. D. Johnson, K. N. Lynn and A. P.
Sanders, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1964, 86, 1376.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
J. Name., 2015, 00, 1-4 | 3