R.S. Heying et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
3
m
max/cmꢁ1): 3093–2968 (CAH), 1518
Table 1
lit.[50]: 211 °C); IR (KBr,
(C@C), 1458 (C@N), 1345 (N@O); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d/
ppm: 9.04 (s, 1H), 8.85 (d, 1H, J = 2.3 Hz), 8.65 (d, 1H, J = 8.6 Hz),
8.46 (dd, 1H, J = 8.6 and 2.3 Hz), 7.41 (d, 2H, J = 9.0 Hz), 6.74 (d,
2H, J = 9.0 Hz), 3.04 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d/ppm:
150.79, 148.37, 147.48, 145.83, 138.61, 136.75, 130.56, 126.96,
123.87, 120.40, 112.45, 40.51. HRMS (ESI, TOF): m/z calcd. for
Crystallographic data and structure refinement for 1.
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature
Wavelength
Crystal system
Space group
C14H11N3O5
301.26
173 K
0.71073 Å
Triclinic
Pı
¯
C
15H15N4O4 [M + H]+ 315.1088, found 315.1087.
Unit cell dimensions
a = 7.4230 (2) Å
b = 11.8287 (4) Å
c = 15.6458 (6) Å
2,4-Dinitro-40-methoxystilbene (3)
Volume
1336.55 (8) Å3
2,4-Dinitrotoluene (0.250 g, 1.37 mmol) and p-anisaldehyde
(0.187 g, 1.37 mmol) were mixed in the presence of pyrrolidine
(0.085 g, 1.20 mmol) in a 50 mL round-bottomed flask. The system
was kept under magnetic stirring and heated using an oil bath at
90 °C for 30 min. The orange solid obtained was filtered, washed
with ice-cold water, and recrystallized from ethanol, yielding
0.798 g (68.8%) of the product; m.p. obtained: 159.6–160.4 °C
Z
4
Density (calculated)
Absorption coefficient
F (000)
Crystal size
h range for data collection
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Absorption correction
Refinement method
Data/restraints/parameters
GOOF on F2
1.497 mg mꢁ3
0.12 mmꢁ1
624
0.30 ꢂ 0.16 ꢂ 0.06 mm
2.2–32.5°
h = ꢁ11 ? 11, k = ꢁ17 ? 17, l = ꢁ23 ? 23
24,067
9645
None
(m.p. lit. [51]: 163 °C); IR (KBr,
m
max/cmꢁ1): 3101–2933 (CAH),
1531 (C@C), 1513 (C@N), 1336 (N@O); 1H NMR (400 MHz,
DMSO-d6) d/ppm: 8.71 (s, 1H, J4 = 2.0 Hz), 8.46 (dd, 1H,
J3 = 8.8 Hz; J4 = 2.0 Hz), 8.23 (d, 1H, J3 = 8.8 Hz), 7.63 (d, 2H,
J3 = 8.6 Hz), 7.59 (d, 1H, J3 = 16.2 Hz), 7.36 (d, 1H, J3 = 16.2 Hz),
7.01 (d, 2H, J3 = 8.6 Hz), 3.79 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-
d6) d/ppm: 160.42, 146.85, 145.25, 137.97, 137.31, 129.18,
128.66, 128.32, 127.0, 120.30, 118.33, 114.38, 55.25. HRMS (APPI,
Least-squares matrix: full
9645/0/399
1.02
R1 = 0.0463; wR2 = 0.1248
R1 = 0.0704; wR2 = 0.1419
0.39 e Åꢁ3 and ꢁ0.27 e Åꢁ3
Final R indices [I > 2
R indices (all data)
Largest diff. peak and hole
r
(I)]
TOF): m/z calcd. for
301.08186.
C
15H13N2O5 [M + H]+ 301.08190, found
UV–vis studies
A solution of each compound was prepared in DMSO in a con-
2,4-Dinitro-4’-(dimethylamino)stilbene (4)
centration of 5.0 ꢂ 10ꢁ5 mol Lꢁ1. This solution was then used to
2,4-Dinitrotoluene (552 mg, 3.70 mmol) and p-(dimethyl-
amino)benzaldehyde (0.671 g, 3.68 mmol) were mixed in a 50 mL
round-bottomed flask in the presence of pyrrolidine (0.254 g,
3.60 mmol). The system was kept under magnetic stirring and
heated in an oil bath (90 °C) for 30 min. The dark-red solid product
formed was filtered, washed with ice-cold water, and recrystallized
from ethanol, yielding 0.144 g (35.4%) of the product; m.p. obtained:
prepare the solutions of each anion in
a concentration of
2.78 ꢂ 10ꢁ3 mol Lꢁ1, using 5 mL flasks, and the colors of the solu-
tions were compared. These solutions were transferred to cuvettes
hermetically closed with rubber stoppers in order to minimize the
evaporation of the solvent and to avoid the entrance of water into
the system, and the UV–vis spectra were obtained (10 min for the
solutions containing CNꢁ).
175.2–175.7 °C (m.p. lit. [52]: 181 °C); IR (KBr, m
max/cmꢁ1): 3086–
2899 (CAH), 1523 (C@C), 1331 (N@O); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-
d6) d/ppm: 8.68 (s, 1H, J4 = 2.3 Hz), 8.40 (dd, 1H, J3 = 9.0 Hz;
J4 = 2.3 Hz), 8.22 (d, 1H, J3 = 9.0 Hz), 7.59 (d, 1H, J3 = 16.0 Hz), 7.50
(d, 2H, J3 = 8.6 Hz), 7.24 (d, 1H, J3 = 16.0 Hz), 6.75 (d, 2H,
J3 = 8.6 Hz), 2.98 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d/ppm:
151.08, 146.58, 144.87, 139.48, 138.80, 129.34, 127.62, 126.62,
124.13, 120.92, 115.75, 112.42, 40.44. HRMS (ESI, TOF): m/z calcd.
for C16H16N3O4 [M + H]+ 314.1135, found 314.1132.
Titration experiments were performed with the solutions of 1
and of CNꢁ prepared as described above. The flask containing the
stock anion solution was closed with a rubber stopper and the
titration was carried out by adding small volumes of the salt solu-
tion with a microsyringe to a closed quartz cuvette containing the
solution of 1. The UV–vis spectra were obtained after each addition
and the absorbance values were collected at 360 and 400 nm. The
detection and quantification limits were obtained according to the
procedure reported in the literature [57–59].
Single-crystal X-ray structure determination
A prismatic yellow crystal of 1 with dimensions of 0.30–0.16–
0.06 mm3 was selected for crystallographic analysis. X-ray diffrac-
tion data were recorded on a Bruker APX-II DUO diffractometer
equipped with an APEX II CCD area detector using graphite-mono-
Kinetic studies involving compounds 1–3
Kinetic runs were carried out under first-order conditions with
at least an excess of tetra-n-butylammonium cyanide (between
1.5 ꢂ 10ꢁ3 and 2.7 ꢂ 10ꢁ3 mol Lꢁ1). A stock solution of each com-
pound (3.7 ꢂ 10ꢁ3 mol Lꢁ1) was prepared in DMSO. All reactions
were initiated mixing a small volume from the stock solution of
each compound in a hermetically closed 3 cm3 quartz-stoppered
cuvette (10 mm path length) containing 2 mL of DMSO. The final
concentration of the compounds was 5.0 ꢂ 10ꢁ5 mol Lꢁ1 in all
kinetic experiments. After the thermal equilibrium was reached,
a small volume of a stock solution of CNꢁ in DMSO was added to
the cuvette and the kinetic data were collected after an interval
of 5 s. The reaction was monitored through the change in absor-
bance (A) at 340 nm for 1 and 3 and 500 nm for 2. All reactions
gave strict first-order kinetics over more than five half-lives. The
kobs values were obtained from linear plots of ln(A1 ꢁ At) as a
function of time for at least 90% of the reaction using an iterative
chromated Mo K
were recorded by
a
x
(k = 0.71073 Å) at 173 K. The diffraction frames
and / scans using APEX2 [53] and data reduc-
tion procedure was performed using the SAINT and SADABS pro-
grams [54]. The structure was solved and refined with SHELXS97
and SHELXL2013 software [55], respectively. All non-hydrogen
atoms were refined anisotropically. Hydrogen atoms attached to
C atoms were placed at their idealized positions using standard
geometric criteria. ORTEP plot was performed with PLATON soft-
ware [56]. Further crystallographic information is presented in
Table 1.
Full tables containing the crystallographic data (except struc-
ture factors) were deposited at Cambridge Structural Database
(CCDC 977072) and these data are available free of charge at
Please cite this article in press as: R.S. Heying et al., A novel strategy for chromogenic chemosensors highly selective toward cyanide based on its reaction
with 4-(2,4-dinitrobenzylideneamino)benzenes or 2,4-dinitrostilbenes, Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy (2014),