1
44
M. Ryazanov et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 374 (2004) 142–145
-
3
Hal
1.0x10
C
a
C
C
b
-4
(a)
Ln
1.2x10
(
b)
C
-4
8
.0x10
-
-
5
5
A
c
A
A
b
A
8.0x10
-
4
6.0x10
4.0x10
4.0x10
structure type :
structure type:
LaI2
2
H-MoS2
2H-NbS2
-4
LaI H
2
0
.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
-1
1.0
Fig. 3. Stacking variants of the 2H-MoS2 and 2H-NbS2 structure types
used for the simulation of the heavy-atom arrangement in LaI2H projected
along [1 0 0].
1/H (Tesla )
-
4
2.0x10
0
100
200
Temperature (K)
300
400
the characteristic features of the LaI2H diagram. In particu-
◦
◦
lar, the broadness of peaks near 2θ = 14 and 17 can only
be accounted for by the simultaneous presence of multilayer
stacking sequences (2–5 layers) and the construction of an
envelope to the resulting multipeak structure.
Fig. 4. (a) Temperature dependence of the molar magnetic susceptibility
for LaI2 and LaI2H at H = 10 kOe. (b) χM values, approximated at
T → ∞, as a function of inverse magnetic field.
The change of the layer symmetry from tetragonal
to hexagonal upon hydrogenation can be rationalized in
terms of very efficient 2-electron/4-center bonding of the
H-atom, which lies in the plane of three surrounding La
atoms [9].
shown in Fig. 4a) and 0.34(1) µB for LaI2H. In addition,
a magnetic field dependence of the susceptibility has been
seen with a saturation behavior of the susceptibility towards
higher fields as is typically observed for traces of ferromag-
netic impurities (Fig. 4b). As their source we have tentatively
identified the used lanthanum metal filings. A separate sus-
ceptibility measurement carried out on the used La filings
evidenced a similar dependence of χM on the magnetic field
as the studied compounds. We therefore conclude that the
weak temperature dependent paramagnetism in our LaI2 and
LaI2H samples originates from impurities in the starting ma-
terials. The origin of the impurities we could not unambigu-
ously identify until now. Extrapolating T and H to infinity
According to an early study of the dissociation pressure
isotherms for the LaI2-H2 system measured at 1073 K [10],
a miscibility gap exists for LaI2Hx, ranging over 0 ≤ x ≤
0
.5. Indeed, our samples of overall composition LaI2H0.1
and LaI2H0 prepared from mixtures of LaI2 and LaI2H
.25
◦
at 650 C proved to consist of unchanged LaI2 and a hy-
dride halide characterized by a = 4.2356(9) Å and c =
1
5.370(8) Å. Within three e.s.d. values the lattice constants
of the latter are identical in both samples. However, sam-
ple LaI2H0.75 was prepared as a nearly single phase (<5%
LaI2) with the lattice constants a = 4.2354(6) Å and c =
(
“Honda-Owen plot,” Fig. 4b) the temperature-independent
−6
3
paramagnetic susceptibilities χM = 69(2) × 10 cm /mol
−
6
3
and 26(1) × 10 cm /mol were derived for LaI2 and
LaI2H, respectively. Under the reasonable assumption that
all electrons are localized in LaI2H, the difference in χM
1
5.412(2) Å.
Previous measurements of the magnetic susceptibil-
ity of LaI2 had revealed a paramagnetic behavior for the
compound. Burrow et al. [2] related this behavior to a
contamination of their sample by semiconducting LaI2.42.
Correction of the susceptibility values for a Curie impu-
rity contribution resulted in the Pauli paramagnetism of
−6
3
of LaI2 and LaI2H, ꢀχM = χP = 43(2) × 10 cm /mol,
is attributed to the Pauli paramagnetism of LaI2. This
value is in good agreement with the value of 39 ×
−
6
3
1
0
cm /mol, which is estimated using the calculated band
−
6
3
structure [3].
the order of χ ≈ 100 × 10 cm /mol, a value, that ex-
1
ceeds the estimated value for a free-electron d metal by
approximately a factor of 3. In a later work [11] an effec-
tive magnetic moment µeff = 0.5 µB was found for LaI2
and attributed to an intrinsic property based on a small
4. Conclusion
4
f orbital contribution to the valence band of mainly 5d
character.
Fig. 4a shows the results of our magnetic measure-
ments on LaI2 and LaI2H at 10 kOe. Starting from room
The absorption of hydrogen into LaI2 leads to a structural
change characterized by a rearrangement from square planar
nets of La(I) into trigonal layers. This change optimizes the
La–H multicenter bonding and is the reason for a miscibility
gap between LaI2 and LaI2Hx.
Attempts to move the Fermi level in LaI2 closer to the
Van Hove singularities by localizing part of the conduction
electrons at hydride ions failed as the characteristic features
in the band structure of LaI2 are lost due to the structural
change.
−
4
3
temperature values, χM = 1.09 × 10 cm /mol and
−
4
3
1
.18 × 10 cm /mol, for LaI2 and LaI2H, respectively,
the molar magnetic susceptibility increases to the values of
−
4
3
−4
3
7
.84 × 10 cm /mol and 8.61 × 10 cm /mol at 5 K. Lin-
ear fits of χM versus 1/T in the range of 100–350 K result in
= 0.23(1) µB for LaI2, 0.39(1) µB for LaI2H0.75 (not
µ
eff