homoallylic alcohols were obtained in good to excellent yields,
although 300 mol% of PS-Formamide 1 and longer reaction
times were required to complete the reactions in some cases.
One advantage of polymer-supported catalysts is that the
catalysts can be readily recovered and reused, even when excess
amounts of catalysts are used as promoters in the reactions. For
development of truly efficient polymer-supported catalysts, it is
critical that recovery is simple and that the recovered catalysts
retain their activity through multiple trials. We thus investigated
the reusability of PS-Formamide 1. In a preliminary attempt, the
activity of the polymer-supported formamide decreased during
multiple runs. It was observed that the shape of PS-Formamide
1 changed after repeated uses. At this stage, we suspected that
physical destruction of the polymer matrix by magnetic stirring
might occur to induce deactivation of the formamide. Thus, we
used an automatic shaker instead of a magnetic stirrer to
suppress the destruction of the polymer. It was interesting to
find that shaking instead of stirring the reaction mixture was
very effective, and that the activity of the polymer-supported
formamide was retained even with multiple use to afford the
desired homoallylic alcohols in high yields (Table 3). Recovery
of the formamide was quantitative in all three runs, and no
significant loss of activity of the formamide was observed. In
addition, recovered samples of PS-Formamide 1 showed
exactly the same 13C NMR spectra as that of the freshly
prepared 1.
A typical experimental procedure is as follows: an aldehyde
(0.3 mmol), allyltrichlorosilane (0.9 mmol) and PS-Formamide
1 (10–300 mol%) were combined in acetonitrile (1 cm3). The
mixture was stirred or shaken for 9–40 h at room temperature.
For the reuse of 1, shaking was recommended. After the
reaction was complete, the mixture was quenched with water,
and the catalyst 1 was recovered by filtration. A general work-
up and purification by preparative TLC afforded the desired
homoallylic alcohol.
In summary, we have synthesized new types of polymer-
supported formamides as immobilized organocatalysts, which
work well in allylation of aldehydes with allyltrichlorosilane.
Easy and efficient recovery and reusability of the polymer-
supported formamides have been demonstrated, and this may
offset the use of the rather higher loadings of the formamides at
this stage. It is noted that this report is the first example of
successful usage of polymer-supported formamides as Lewis
base-organocatalysts. Further investigations to survey the scope
and limitations of the polymer-supported formamides as well as
to develop other polymer-supported organocatalysts are in
progress.
This work was partially supported by CREST and SORST,
Japan Science Technology Coporation and a Grant-in-Aid for
Scientific Research from Japan Society of the Promotion of
Sciences.
Notes and references
1 For a review on enantioselective organocatalysts, see: P. I. Dalko and L.
Moisan, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 3726.
2 For a recent report on soluble polymer-supported prolines as im-
mobilized organocatalysts, see: M. Benaglia, M. Cimquini, F. Cozzi, A.
Puglisi and G. Celentano, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2002, 344, 533.
3 For a recent review on recoverable catalysts and reagents using
recyclable polystyrene-based supports, see: C. A. McNamara, J. Dixon
and M. Bradley, Chem. Rev., 2002, 102, 3275.
4 S. Kobayashi and K. Nishio, Tetrahedron Lett., 1993, 34, 3453; S.
Kobayashi and K. Nishio, J. Org. Chem., 1994, 59, 6620.
5 S. Kobayashi and R. Hirabayashi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 6942;
R. Hirabayashi, C. Ogawa, M. Sugiura and S. Kobayashi, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2001, 123, 9493; C. Ogawa, M. Sugiura and S. Kobayashi, J. Org.
Chem., 2002, 67, 5359.
6 For related enantioselective allylations of aldehydes with allyltri-
chlorosilanes, see: S. E. Denmark and J. Fu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001,
123, 9488; S. E. Denmark, D. M. Coe, N. E. Patt and B. D. Griedel, J.
Org. Chem., 1994, 59, 6161; M. Nakajima, M. Saito and S. Hashimoto,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 6419; K. Iseki, S. Mizuno, Y. Kuroki and
Y. Kobayashi, Tetrahedron, 1999, 55, 977; T. Shimada, A. Kina, S.
Ikeda and T. Hayashi, Org. Lett., 2002, 124, 2477.
7 Similar types of polymeric formamides as phase transfer catalysts were
reported. S. Kondo, Y. Inagaki and K. Tsuda, J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Lett.
Ed., 1984, 22, 249; S. Kondo, Y. Inagaki, H. Yasui, M. Iwasaki and K.
Tsuda, J. Polym. Sci. Part A: Polym. Chem., 1991, 29, 243; see also: I.
Voigt, F. Simon, K. Esthel, S. Spange and M. Friedrich, Langmuir,
2001, 17, 8355.
8 S. Kobayashi and M. Moriwaki, Tetrahedron Lett., 1997, 38, 4251.
9 S. Kobayashi, R. Akiyama, T. Furuta and M. Moriwaki, Molecules
Online, 1998, 2, 35; S. Kobayashi, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1999, 28, 1; S.
Kobayashi and R. Akiyama, Pure Appl. Chem., 2001, 73, 1103.
10 Polymer-supported formamide 1 was prepared by the following
procedure: N-methylformamide (30 mmol) in DMF (30 cm3) were
added slowly to sodium hydride (30 mmol) in DMF (30 cm3) and then
chloromethylated resin (10 g, 11.0 mmol) was added. The reaction
mixture was stirred for 12 h at room temperature and the reaction then
stopped with water (15 cm3). The polymer was filtered off and washed
three times with methanol (15 cm3), diethyl ether (15 cm3), tetra-
hydrofuran (15 cm3) and dichloromethane (15 cm3) and then dried for
24 h under vacuum. 13C SR-MAS NMR of 1 (100 MHz, CDCl3,
selected): d 162.4 (CNO), 53.1 (CH2), 33.9 (CH3).
Table 3 Reuse of PS-Formamide 1
Run
1st
2nd
3rd
Yielda (%)
Recovery (%)
90 (90)
Quant.
86 (85)
Quant.
86 (43)
Quant.
a Yields obtained using a magetic stirrer are given in parentheses.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2003, 192–193
193