D.A.T. Pires et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 1113 (2016) 146e152
151
Table 2
Energy (minima) difference of the keto and the enol forms for each compound calculated by DFT (B3LYP)/6-31Ga in vacuum and in the presence of solvents (acetone, DMSO and
methanol).
Compound
1
D
Evacuum (kJ/mol)
D
Eacetone (kJ/mol)
D
EDMSO (kJ/mol)
DEmethanol (kJ/mol)
Enola
Keto
Enola
Keto
Enola
Keto
Enola
Keto
Enol
14.43
18.13
18.75
22.56
23.37
6.12
2.86
5.19
2.53
7.09
4.58
2
3
4
5
3.71
3.22
5.16
24.61
23.29
25.02
22.78
24.87
25.10
Ketoa
a
The most stable form.
3. Results and discussion
in DMSO (Fig. 4), showed the signal for the H-3 as compounds 1 to
4. However, it was also observed one signal related to H-10 (char-
acteristic of keto form). The same behavior was observed for sub-
stance 5 in acetone (see Supplementary Material). The temperature
did not influence the tautomeric equilibrium of 5.
As previously reported [18,19], the synthesis of compounds 1 to
5 (Table 1) were achieved via DBU-promoted condensation be-
tween phtalaldehydic acid and appropriated 1,3-diketones. For all
synthesized compounds, their tautomeric equilibrium was inves-
tigated by NMR, IR spectroscopy, Mass spectrometry, as well as
Molecular Modeling.
The APT spectra of 5 in DMSO showed a signal at 55.1 ppm,
related to C-10 (Fig. 5), indicating the presence of a eCH group. The
quaternary C-10 was not observed and, consequently, confirmed the
keto form for this compound. Similarly to the proton spectrum,
temperature did not affect the APT spectrum. The same behavior is
observed for compound 5 in acetone (see Supplementary Material).
It is worth to mention that 13C-NMR showed two different peaks
for ketone carbonyl groups (Supplementary Material). This obser-
vation is in agreement with the keto form of 5. The same result was
observed in acetone. The carbon spectra for compounds 1 to 4
showed only the presence of one ketone carbonyl signal.
By comparing the NMR data of compounds 4 and 5, it can be
inferred that the presence of an aromatic ring fused to the 1,3-
diketone five membered ring changes the tautomeric equilibrium
so that the keto form is observable in the case of compound 5.
Mass spectrometry experiments can provide insight about the
species involved in tautomeric equilibria. Fragmentation of 18 Da
can be related to the dehydration of the OH group in the form of
H2Oþ, and fragmentation of 28 Da can be related to the C]O group
in the form of COþ [21].
The study of the keto-enol equilibria by 1H-NMR was performed
observing the multiplicity of the H-3 signal (singlet for the enol
form and duplet for the keto form). It was also observed the pres-
ence (for the keto form) or the absence (for the enol form) of a
signal due to H-10 (see Table 1 for numbering). Furthermore, the C-
10 signal in APT spectra was also used to study the tautomeric
equilibria, observing that it is a quaternary carbon in the enol form
and a eCH in the keto form. The complete assignments of com-
pounds 1 to 5 in acetone, DMSO and methanol can be seen in the
Supplementary material.
The expansion of the aromatic region of the 1H-NMR spectrum
for compound 1 in methanol, at different temperatures, is shown in
Fig. 1. The H-3 signal is observed as a singlet, and the integration
refers to a single proton. Additionally, both the multiplicity and the
integration of the signals do not vary with the temperature
increase.
The APT spectra of compound 1 in methanol at different tem-
peratures show the signal concerning to the C-10 being a quaternary
carbon at all temperatures (Fig. 2). A similar trend is also observed
for the spectra acquired in acetone and DMSO solvents (see
Supplementary Material). Therefore, the enol form of compound 1
is favored regardless the solvent, even at higher temperatures.
It is interesting to observe the variation in the multiplicity of H-
30 and H-50 (Fig. 3) with increasing temperature. This variation can
be explained by the faster rotation around C10-C3 bond, which
leads to the coalescence of the signals at higher temperatures. This
coalescence was also observed for compound 1 in acetone and
DMSO (see Supplementary Material). This faster rotation also af-
fects the signals for C-30 and C-50 (Supplementary Material)
Compounds 2, 3 and 4 showed similar behavior to that
described for compound 1. For all of them, the enol form is favored
in different solvents (methanol, acetone and DMSO) as well as at
different temperatures (see Supplementary Material). Therefore,
for these compounds, solvent and temperature did not interfere in
the keto-enol equilibria. The presence of methyl groups (one or
two) attached to alicyclic portion also did not affect the equilib-
rium. Moreover, the replacement of the six-membered ring by a
five-membered one did not favor the keto form (see
Supplementary Material).
The MS/MS analysis of compound 5 revealed the presence of the
enol form as the sole species in the equilibrium. This statement is
corroborated by the observation of a fragmentation of 18 Da of the
OH group in the form of H2Oþ as shown in Fig. 6 for compound 5
[21,22].
The MS/MS spectra of compounds 1e4 (see Supplementary
Material) also showed that fragmentation (18 Da), indicating that
the enol form of these compounds is favored in the equilibria in the
gas phase.
The Mass spectrometry, as well as the NMR experiments for
compounds 1 to 4, revealed only the presence of enol species in the
tautomeric equilibria. On the contrary, while the NMR experiments
showed the presence of keto form in the equilibrium for compound
5, the mass experiments results showed exclusively the presence of
the enol form of compound 5. Thereby, the physical state of the
compound, gas phase (analyzed by Mass spectrometry) and solu-
tion (analyzed by NMR) can affect the keto-enol equilibrium of the
investigated compound.
We also sought information about the tautomeric equilibrium of
substances 1 to 5 analyzing them in solid phase by IR spectroscopy.
Regarding compounds 1 to 4, the IR spectra present a broad band
which can be associated to the OeH group of the enol form, as it is
shown in Fig. 7 for compound 1 (IR spectra for compounds 2 to 4 are
shown in the Supplementary Material). Thus, the enol form is
Compound 5 was insoluble in methanol, which precluded NMR
analyses using this solvent. The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 5