Scheme 2a
Scheme 3a
a Reagents and conditions: (i) water, K2CO3, Bu4NBr, Pd(OAc)2,
70 °C, 2 h, 98%; (ii) KMnO4, pyridine, water, reflux, 24 h, 96%;
(iii) concentrated H2SO4, 25 °C, 2 h, 90%; (iv) N2H4‚H2O, KOH,
diethylene glycol, reflux, 48 h, 76%.
a Reagents and conditions: (i) dichlorobenzene, reflux, 12 h,
90%; (ii) glacial AcOH, HBr, reflux, 48 h, (1b, 78%; 2b, 78%);
then concentrated H2SO4, 3 h, rt, (1c, 90%; 2c, 88%); (iii)
N2H4‚H2O, KOH, diethylene glycol, reflux, 24 h, (1, 95%; 2, 98%).
λmax and the photoluminescence efficiency are relatively
insensitive to the phenyl substituent and mainly arise from
the indenofluorene moiety. However, the pendent phenyl
groups could influence the emission wavelength, as com-
pounds 1 and 2 with one and two phenyl groups showed a
red-shifted emission compared with that of 3 (Table 1). The
longer emission wavelength of 1 and 2 reveals the contribu-
tion of phenyl substituents to a more conjugated excited state,
in contrast with a twisted ground state. It can also be seen
that the sharpness of emission peak is affected by the phenyl
substituent (Figure 1).
As described in Scheme 2, compound 1 was synthesized
starting with a Diels-Alder addition of the cyclone 1a7 and
diphenylacetylene to give the tetraphenyl diester 1b in 90%
yield. The hydrolysis of 1b was performed in acetic acid
with hydrobromic acid to give the corresponding acid, which
was cyclized quantitatively in the diketone 1c. It was noticed
that the cyclization was regiospecific and gave only one
isomer. The steric hindrance and torsion angles of the
terphenyl moiety probably play a dominant role in this
cyclization. The subsequent Wolf-Kirshner reduction af-
forded 1 in 86% yield.
Cyclic voltammograms of 3 exhibited two quasi-reversible
reduction peaks of respective potential (vs SCE) E1red
)
-2.6 V and Er2ed ) -2.9 V and one quasi-reversible
oxidation peak of potential Eo1x ) 1.25 V (Figure 2 and
Table 1), whereas 1 and 2 exhibited only one quasi-reversible
Compound 2 was synthesized via the same route as 1 using
phenylacetylene instead of diphenylacetylene. In this case
the cyclization gave two isomers, which had to be separated
by fractional recrystallization.
As shown in Scheme 3, compound 3 was synthesized using
a modified Ebel method.8 The aqueous Suzuki coupling
between 2,5-dibromo-p-xylene and phenylboronic acid gave
3a in 98% yield,9 which was oxidized using potassium
permanganate in aqueous pyridine to yield the corresponding
acid. The cyclization and the subsequent reduction afforded
3 in overall 64%.
Figure 1 displays the UV-vis and photoluminescence (PL)
spectra of 1-3 in solution. The absorption spectra of 1-3
are similar, displaying an absorption maximum around 329-
334 nm (Table 1). It is expected that the absorbance from
the indenofluorene moiety remains the same while the peak
at 220 nm decreases as the number of pendent phenyl groups
decreases from 2 to 1 and 0.
Compounds 1-3 are highly fluorescent with a quantum
yield of 73-78%. These results indicate that the absorption
(6) Marsitzky, D.; Scott, J. C.; Chen, J. P.; Lee, V. Y.; Miller, R. D.;
Setayesh, S.; Muellen, K. AdV. Mater. 2001, 13, 1096.
(7) Qi, Y.; Wang, Z. Y. Macromolecules 1994, 27, 625.
(8) Ebel, F.; Deutschel, W. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges.. 1956, 89, 2794.
(9) Badone, D.; Baroni, M.; Cordamone, R. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62,
7170.
Figure 1. UV-vis absorption (24 µM in cyclohexane for 1 and 2,
in Decalin for 3) and PL of 1 (0.6 µM in cyclohexane), 2 (0.6 µM
in cyclohexane), and 3 (0.6 µM in Decalin) excited at 329-334
nm.
2158
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 13, 2002