Molybdenum Nitrogenase Reduction of CO
substrate reduction. To test whether ␣-His195 might also be
responsible for delivery of protons for CO reduction, the
␣-Gln195 substitution was introduced into the ␣-Ala70 MoFe
protein. The resulting doubly substituted MoFe protein
showed significantly lowered CO reduction rates for all
products, consistent with the ␣-His195 being responsible for
much, but not all, of the proton delivery for CO reduction in
the MoFe protein.
FIGURE 6. Schematic representation of a possible CO-derived hydrocar-
bon formation at the nitrogenase active site. Black circles represent CO
binding sites, presumably Fe atoms, upon which two CO can bind. Following
reduction to semireduced states (-CHx and -CHy), coupling can occur, result-
ing in formation of a CHx–CHy species. The binding of additional CO mole-
cules can lead to further chain elongation.
One of the goals for Fischer-Tropsch chemistry is finding
factor (6). At low CO concentrations, only one CO is bound, catalysts and conditions that favor the formation of the higher
whereas at higher CO concentrations, two CO molecules are value, longer chain hydrocarbons such as propene and propane
bound (17–19). The observation that CO can be reduced to (23). Here, we report that the introduction of additional amino
two- and three-carbon containing hydrocarbons demands that acid substitutions near the FeMo-cofactor and increasing the
the two CO binding sites on the FeMo-cofactor are close CO concentration can significantly shift the product profile of
enough to allow a coupling reaction that would result in the nitrogenase CO reduction and coupling in favor of production
formation of C2 and C3 hydrocarbon products. This fact, cou- of these longer chain hydrocarbons. Thus, the molybdenum
pled with the parallels between this reaction and the Fischer- nitrogenase offers an experimentally tractable system for exam-
Tropsch reaction (20–23), suggests a possible mechanism for ining mechanistic features that favor the production of longer
CO reduction and coupling by nitrogenase (Fig. 6).
chain hydrocarbons from CO that might be translated to the
Initially, two CO molecules would chemisorb to two adjacent development of small molecule metal complexes that catalyze
metal (Fig. 6, black circles) atoms of the FeMo-cofactor. Avail- such reactions.
able spectroscopic studies on CO bound to FeMo-cofactor
In summary, we report that when the active site of the molyb-
indicate that the CO molecules are bound to iron atoms located denum nitrogenase is exposed by substitution of ␣-Val70, CO
in the waist region of the FeMo-cofactor (19, 24, 25). Reduction can be reduced and coupled to yield the hydrocarbons meth-
of the two metal bound CO molecules by protons and electrons ane, ethylene, ethane, propene, and propane. Further, it is
(hydrogen) with loss of water would result in the formation of found that the relative ratio of products can be manipulated
metal-bound -CHx and -CHy groups. Analogous intermediates by altering other amino acids, electron flux, or the CO
have been proposed in a mechanism for the Fischer-Tropsch concentration.
reaction (22). Either the two metal-bound -CHx groups could
be further reduced/protonated, resulting in release of methane,
or a coupling reaction could result in the formation of a CHx–
CHy species bound to one metal. This species could yield eth-
ylene or ethane, or a third CO could bind to and be reduced at
the open metal site, leading to the formation of C3 or longer
hydrocarbons. Traces of longer chain (C4) hydrocarbon prod-
ucts were detected from molybdenum nitrogenase reduction
and from coupling of CO molecules that were tentatively
assigned by mass spectroscopy as isobutene and n-butane (data
not shown).
Acknowledgment—We thank Dr. Brett Barney, University of Minne-
sota, for helpful discussions.
REFERENCES
1. Smil, V. (2004) Enriching the Earth: Fritz Haber, Carl Bosch, and the Trans-
formation of World Food Production, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
2. Burgess, B. K., and Lowe, D. J. (1996) Chem. Rev. 96, 2983–3012
3. Eady, R. R. (1996) Chem. Rev. 96, 3013–3030
4. Howard, J. B., and Rees, D. C. (1994) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 63, 235–264
5. Joerger, R. D., and Bishop, P. E. (1988) Crit. Rev. Microbiol 16, 1–14
6. Davis, L. C., Henzl, M. T., Burris, R. H., and Orme-Johnson, W. H. (1979)
Biochemistry 18, 4860–4869
In this mechanism, it is expected that higher CO concentra-
tions would favor two bound CO molecules, which in turn
would favor formation of longer chain hydrocarbons (e.g. pro-
pene and propane) consistent with the observations here. Nev-
ertheless, even under low CO concentrations that have been
assigned to a single CO bound to the FeMo-cofactor, we still
observe C2 and C3 products, consistent with CO binding at
both sites even at the lower CO concentrations.
7. Rivera-Ortiz, J. M., and Burris, R. H. (1975) J. Bacteriol. 123, 537–545
8. Lee, C. C., Hu, Y., and Ribbe, M. W. (2010) Science 329, 642
9. Dos Santos, P. C., Igarashi, R. Y., Lee, H. I., Hoffman, B. M., Seefeldt, L. C.,
and Dean, D. R. (2005) Acc. Chem. Res 38, 208–214
10. Seefeldt, L. C., Hoffman, B. M., and Dean, D. R. (2009) Annu. Rev. Biochem.
78, 701–722
11. Christiansen, J., Goodwin, P. J., Lanzilotta, W. N., Seefeldt, L. C., and Dean,
D. R. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 12611–12623
Essential for the CO reduction reactions is the delivery of
protons. For the Fischer-Tropsch reduction of CO, hydrogen
atoms come from H2. For the nitrogenase-catalyzed reduction,
protons appear to come from multiple sites, although the
␣-His195 residue located near the FeMo-cofactor has been
shown to play a critical role in proton delivery for reduction of
nitrogenous substrates (14, 15). Substitution of this residue
with the amino acid glutamine effectively eliminates N2 reduc-
tion, although N2 still binds to the FeMo-cofactor in the substi-
tuted MoFe protein (14, 15). Such an inability to reduce N2 is
likely due to a disruption in the proton delivery needed for
12. Dos Santos, P. C., Mayer, S. M., Barney, B. M., Seefeldt, L. C., and Dean,
D. R. (2007) J. Inorg. Biochem. 101, 1642–1648
13. Benton, P. M., Mayer, S. M., Shao, J., Hoffman, B. M., Dean, D. R., and
Seefeldt, L. C. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 13816–13825
14. Kim, C. H., Newton, W. E., and Dean, D. R. (1995) Biochemistry 34,
2798–2808
15. Fisher, K., Dilworth, M. J., and Newton, W. E. (2000) Biochemistry 39,
15570–15577
16. Maskos, Z., Fisher, K., Sørlie, M., Newton, W. E., and Hales, B. J. (2005)
J. Biol. Inorg. Chem 10, 394–406
17. Lee, H., Cameron, L. M., Hales, B. J., and Hoffman, B. M. (1997) J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 119, 10121–10126
19420 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
VOLUME 286•NUMBER 22•JUNE 3, 2011