Y. Guo et al.
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters xxx (xxxx) xxx–xxx
Table 2
the double bond of the acryloyl moiety was saturated; analog 7e with a
4-methoxyphenylpropanoyl ester at the 8-position was the least potent
compound.
MDR reversal activity of 7a–y (10 µM) against MDR cell lines.
Compd
A2780/T
A2780/CDDP
KB-V
Paclitaxel (nM)
Cisplatin (µM)
VCR (nM)
Next, compounds 7a, 7o, 7t, and 7y, which displayed high MDR
reversal activity in the A2780/T cell line, were further evaluated in two
additional drug-resistant cell lines KB-V and A2780/CDDP, when co-
administered with vincristine (VCR) and cisplatin, respectively. To our
surprise, the four compounds showed strong drug-resistant reversal
activity with high reversal ratios in KB-V cells, but no significant effects
in A2780/CDDP cells. The r.r. values of 7o and 7y were 793 and 1257,
higher than that of verapamil (5 0 9) in KB-V, but only 0.76 and 0.78,
slightly lower than that of verapamil (1.07) in A2780/CDDP cells. The
IC50 values of VCR against the KB-V cell line decreased dramatically
from 666.30 nM alone to 0.84 nM and 0.53 nM when co-administered
with 7o or 7y, respectively. The results were consistent with those for
paclitaxel in A2780/T cells. In contrast, no reversal effects were seen in
A2780/CDDP cells.
IC50
r.r.
IC50
r.r.
IC50
r.r.
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
a
b
c
d
e
f
17.7
64.7
54.9
129.2
668.6
71.2
39.2
83.8
77.4
155
224
61
51.97
0.83
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.76
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.86
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.78
1.07
ND
2.12
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.84
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.99
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.53
1.31
ND
ND
666.3
314
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
793
ND
ND
ND
ND
134
ND
ND
ND
ND
1257
509
ND
ND
3173
a
ND
72
ND
31
ND
6
ND
56
ND
g
h
i
101
47
ND
ND
51
ND
j
26
ND
k
l
74.2
25.1
40.8
288.4
5.4
54
ND
158
97
ND
m
n
o
p
q
r
ND
14
ND
P-gp over-expression readily causes MDR in many cancer cell lines.
Therefore, we measured the P-gp expression in the five tested cancer
cell lines, two drug-sensitive (A2780 and KB) and three drug-resistant
735
86
56.59
ND
46.4
42.9
20.2
24.6
11.2
41.8
88.6
55.5
124.7
8
93
ND
(
A2780/T, A2780/CDDP and KB-V), using Western blot analysis. As
197
161
354
95
ND
s
ND
shown in Fig. 3, we observed P-gp overexpression in the A2780/T and
KB-V drug-resistant cell lines, but not in the cisplatin-resistant A2780/
CDDP or A2780 and KB drug-sensitive cell lines. This outcome sup-
ported our above findings that the seco-C khellactone analogs were
active as chemosensitizers in A2780/T and KB-V but not A2780/CDDP
cell lines. A close relationship exists between the chemoreversal activity
and P-gp over-expression in the drug-resistant cancer cell lines. We are
performing studies on the detailed pharmacological mechanism and
will report our findings in the future.
t
50.13
ND
u
v
w
x
y
45
ND
72
ND
32
ND
496
211
1418
ND
ND
54.98
40.11
ND
Verapamil
Paclitaxel
Cisplatin
VCR
18.8
3970
ND
b
c
43.11
ND
17
d
ND
ND
In brief, we designed and synthesized 25 seco-4-methyl-DCK deri-
vatives and evaluated their ability to chemosensitize A2780/T and KB-
V cell lines toward paclitaxel and vincristine. None of the compounds
displayed significant cytotoxicity in HOSEC, HUVEC, T29, A2780/T,
A2780/CDDP and KB-V cell lines, and some of them had stronger MDR
reversal activity compared with verapamil. Among them, compounds
a
b
ND: Not determined.
Drug resistance ratio of A2780/T, defined as IC50 (A2780/T)/IC50 (A2780) of
paclitaxel = 3970 nM/2.8 nM.
c
Drug resistance ratio of A2780/CDDP, defined as IC50 (A2780/CDDP)/IC50
(
A2780) of cisplatin = 43.11 µM/2.55 µM.
d
Drug resistance ratio of KB-V, defined as IC50 (KB-V)/IC50 (KB) of
7
o and 7y showed the most potent reversal activity. When paclitaxel
VCR = 666.3 nM/0.21 nM.
and vincristine were administrated together with 10 μM of 7o or 7y, the
reversal ratios (735 and 496 in A2780/T; 793 and 1257 in KB-V) were
higher than those of verapamil (211 and 509). A preliminary structure-
activity relationship (SAR) analysis indicated that MDR reversal activity
was maintained with an appropriately substituted bicyclic coumarin
core. Additionally, various benzoyl and cinnamoyl aromatic esters,
particularly (E)-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)acryloyl, at the 8-position were
favorable to the reversal ability. Interestingly, these compounds did not
reverse resistance to cisplatin in the non-P-gp overexpressing A2780/
CDDP cell line, indicating a close relationship between the MDR re-
versal activity of these newly synthesized compounds and the P-gp
expression level of drug-resistant cancer cell lines. Further studies will
be carried out to investigate the detailed mechanistic and pharmaco-
kinetic properties of these seco-4-methy-DCK derivatives as potential
chemosensitizer.
Fig. 3. P-gp expression in drug-sensitive and coupled drug-resistant cancer cell
lines.
chemosensitization. The MDR reversal activity was not affected sig-
nificantly or consistently by the choice of ethoxy or isopropoxy at the 7-
position of the coumarin. As mentioned above, the most potent com-
pounds contained methoxy-substituted cinnamoyl esters at the cou-
marin 8-position (7o and 7y), while the next most potent compounds
contained 3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoyl and 3-(dimethylamino)benzoyl es-
ters (7t and 7a, respectively). Introduction of electron-donating moi-
eties on the aromatic ring of the ester group generally improved the
reversal activity, while electron-withdrawing groups decreased the ac-
tivity [e.g., 7g (3,4-dimethoxybenzoyl) > 7d (4-chloro-3-nitrobenzyl);
Acknowledgments
Many thanks to the grant from “Major New Drugs Innovation and
Development” of National Science and Technology Major Projects
(
2018ZX09711002-007-005) for supporting this study.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
7
y
(p-methoxycinnamoyl) > 7w
(cinnamoyl) > 7x
(p-chlor-
ocinnamoyl)]. In addition, the potency decreased dramatically when
3