Stilb-4 > Stilb-2 > Stilb-3 (Figure 6), the dispersal of
chromophores in a disordered manner seems to be important for
effective fluorescence quenching.
quenching efficiency were observed for thin-layer films of
Quino-1 and Benth-1. The observed red-shift of the gel and
xerogel states of Carbz-1 in UV-vis spectroscopy suggests an
interaction similar to J-aggregation between carbazole units. The
peak absorption wavelengths of Stilb-1 and Stilb-4 were almost
unchanged when gels were formed upon cooling their heated
solutions. This indicates disorder among the stilbene units in the
gels. The peak absorption wavelengths of Stilb-2 and Stilb-3 in
solutions at 85°C were significantly blue-shifted in the gel state
at 25°C, which suggests the existence of – stacking similar to
H-aggregation among the stilbene units in the gels. The
estimated HOMO and LUMO energy levels of carbazole-
containing gelators and TNT indicate that photoinduced electron
transfer from fluorescent gelators to TNT is possible.
3.7. Mechanism of TNT detection
HOMO and LUMO energies were measured to study the
mechanism of TNT detection. The HOMO and LUMO energies
of carbazole, Carbz-1, Carbz-3, Carbz-4, and Carbz-5 are
summarized in Table 3. The HOMO levels were determined by
measuring the ionization potential (IP). The LUMO levels are
calculated from the IP and band-gap energies estimated from the
UV-vis spectra. The HOMO and LUMO levels of carbazole were
−5.80 and −2.18 eV, respectively, whereas those of Carbz-1,
Carbz-3, Carbz-4, and Carbz-5 were calculated to be ~−5.8 eV
and ~−2.2 eV, respectively. These results suggest that the HOMO
and LUMO levels of the carbazole unit are mostly uninfluenced
by the connection of gelation-driving segments. Energy
calculations with optimized geometries were carried out using
density functional theory at the B3LYP/6-31G* level for the
TNT molecule. The HOMO and LUMO energies of TNT were
−8.7 and −3.8 eV, respectively. The HOMO and LUMO energy
levels of carbazole, Carbz-1, Carbz-3, Carbz-4, Carbz-5, and
TNT are shown in Figure 7. Photoinduced electron transfer from
carbazole and the fluorescent gelators to TNT is clearly possible,
resulting in fluorescence quenching. Despite the almost identical
HOMO and LUMO energies of carbazole, Carbz-1, Carbz-3,
Carbz-4, and Carbz-5, an obvious difference in the
fluorescence-quenching efficiency was observed: Carbz-4 >
Carbz-1 > Carbz-3 > Carbz-5 > carbazole (Figure 1). These
results indicate that the morphology of the thin-layer films plays
an important role. The high surface areas can successfully come
into contact with TNT vapor, resulting in effective quenching.
Acknowledgement
The present research was supported in part by JSPS
KAKENHI Grant Number JP15K05623.
References
1. A. Narayanan, O. P. Varnavski, T. M. Swager, J. Phys.
Chem. C 2008, 112, 881.
2. C. Vijayakumar, G. Tobin, W. Schmitt, M.-J. Kim, M.
Takeuchi, Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 874.
3. Y. Yang, H. Wang, K. Su, Y. Long, Z. Peng, N. Li, F. Liu, J.
Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 11895.
4. C. Zhang, Y. Che, X. Yang, B. R. Bunes, L. Zang, Chem.
Commun. 2010, 46, 5560.
5. H. Nie, Y. Zhao, M. Zhang, Y. Ma, M. Baumgarten, K.
Müllen, Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 1234.
6. H. Nie, G. Sun, M. Zhang, M. Baumgarten, K. Müllen, J.
Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 2129.
7. Z. Ding, Q. Zhao, R. Xing, X. Wang, J. Ding, L. Wang, Y.
Han, J. Mater. Chem. C 2013, 1, 786.
4. Conclusion
New compounds containing carbazole, quinoline,
benzothiazole, and stilbene were prepared as fluorescent gelators.
The obtained compounds could form physical gels in some
solvents. Thin-layer films were prepared on quartz plates by
drop-casting, and their abilities to detect explosives such as
saturated TNT or RDX vapor were evaluated by fluorescence
quenching. The fluorescence-quenching efficiencies of the thin-
layer films of Carbz-4 were ~60% and 100% after exposure to
TNT for 2 and 40 min, respectively. The fluorescence-quenching
rate decreased in the order Carbz-4 > Carbz-1 > Carbz-3 >
Carbz-5 > carbazole. The morphology, studied by DFM, of the
thin-layer films obtained from the chloroform solution of
carbazole was microcrystalline and was not a xerogel. The
morphologies of the thin-layer films of Carbz-1, Carbz-3,
Carbz-4, and Carbz-5 were 3D networks of juxtaposed and
interlocked fibers with very uneven surfaces. Quino-1 showed
the best quenching efficiency among the quinoline-containing
gelators. Although the thin-layer film of Benth-1 showed 100%
quenching after 60 min, the quenching efficiencies of
benzothiazole-containing gelators were unremarkable when
compared with carbazole-containing gelators. The fluorescence-
quenching efficiencies of the thin-layer film obtained from the
toluene gel of Stilb-1 by TNT vapor were ~37% and 96% for 2
and 40 min exposures, respectively. The fluorescence-quenching
rate decreased in the order Stilb-1 > Stilb-4 > Stilb-2 > Stilb-3.
The fluorescence-quenching efficiency decreased distinctly with
increasing film thickness. The fluorescence-quenching
efficiency of Carbz-1 decreased from 71% for a film thickness
of 70 nm to ~10% for a thickness of 200 nm. When the thin-layer
film thickness was less than 20 nm, the fluorescence was too
weak to detect TNT. Despite the very low vapor pressure of
saturated RDX, moderately good decreases (~50%) in
8. K. K. Kartha, S. S. Babu, S. Srinivasan, A. Ajayaghosh, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 4834.
9. N. Dey, S. K. Samanta, S. Bhattacharya, ACS Appl. Mater.
Interfaces 2013, 5, 8394.
10. P. Terech, R. G. Weiss, Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 3133.
11. J. H. Esch, B. L. Feringa, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39,
2263.
12. L. A. Estroff, A. D. Hamilton, Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 1201.
13. P. Dastidar, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 2699.
14. S. Banerjee, R. K. Das, U. Maitra, J. Mater. Chem. 2009,
19, 6649.
15. M. Suzuki, K. Hanabusa, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 967.
16. M. Suzuki, K. Hanabusa, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 455.
17. J.-L. Li, X.-Y. Liu, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010, 20, 3196.
18. G. John, B. V. Shankar, S. R. Jadhav, P. K. Vemula,
Langmuir 2010, 26, 17843.
19. H. Svobodová, V. Noponen, E. Kolehmainen, E. Sievänen,
RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 4985.
20. S. S. Babu, S. Prasanthkumar, A. Ajayaghosh, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 1766.
21. A. Y.-Y. Tam, V. W.-W. Yam, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42,
1540.
22. J. Raeburn, A. Z. Cardoso, D. J. Adams, Chem. Soc. Rev.
2013, 42, 1543.
23. G. Yu, X. Yan, C. Han, F. Huang, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42,
6697.
24. M. D, Segarra-Maset, V. J. Nebot, J. F. Miravet, B. Escuder,
Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 7086.
25. S. S. Babu, V. K. Praveen, A. Ajayaghosh, Chem. Rev. 2014,
114, 1973.
26. D. K. Kumar, J. W. Steed, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 2080.
27. V. K. Praveen, C. Ranjith, N. Armaroli, Angew. Chem., Int.