COMMUNICATIONS
available from Calbiochem-Novabiochem. All new compounds were fully
characterized or compared to known substances.
hand addition of insoluble bases (e.g. K2CO3 or KOH) or
polymer-bound tertiary amines appears appropriate as these
reagents undergo no side reactions with diazonium ions and
are easily separated from the reactionmixture by filtration.
Scheme 4 shows that primary and secondary amines can be
removed quantitatively from solution. Anilines and phenols
are removed in high yields, as long as they are not too electron
poor and therefore are not sufficiently nucleophilic. Never-
theless nearly all phenols could be removed by using the T2*
resinupondeprotonationof the phenol, but this procedure
requires strong bases like KOH or NaH, and therefore makes
aqueous workup necessary. However phenols, which react
only with very electrophilic diazonium ions (e.g. 2,6-di-tert-
butylphenol) could not be removed.
In summary, immobilized diazonium ions can have a high
stability, which enables their application as linkers and
scavengers in solid-phase organic chemistry. They could, for
example, be used as backbone amide linkers in peptide
chemistry, or for the immobilizationof carbonnucleophiles
such as malonic acid esters or silylenol ethers. Furthermore
they are easy to handle, both in terms of stability and toxicity
of the compounds. Thus triazenes, which are formed upon
reaction with amines and which are considered as carcinogens,
can be easily and safely handled.
The DSC measurements were carried out on a Perkin Elmer DSC 7 with a
polymer-bound diazonium ion with a loading of 1.0 mmolgÀ1. The DSC
analysis of the used chloromethylpolystyrene starting material resulted in
an endothermic melting enthalpy of 2.6 Jper gram resin at the melting
point of 1188C. The melting point lies in the region of the exothermal
decomposition of the diazonium ions, but the melting enthalpy is about 50
times smaller. As the tolerance of the method is about 10%, the melting
enthalpy was not taken into account for the examination of the reaction
enthalpy.
Typical procedure for the attachment of amines to the T2* resin: Resin 3
(5.0 g, 5.5 mmol, loading 1.1 mmolgÀ1) was suspended in THF (50 mL) and
cooled to 08C. Benzylamine (3.0 mL, 5 equiv, 27.5 mmol) was added slowly
under careful stirring. After 1 h, the resin was filtered, washed alternately
with THF and MeOH, and dried in high vacuum.
Typical procedure to remove nucleophiles with the T2* resinadn
diethylaminomethylpolystyrene: Resin
3 (100 mg, 0.11 mmol, loading
1.1 mmolgÀ1
)
and diethylaminomethylpolystyrene (50 mg, 0.116 mmol,
loading 2.33 mmolgÀ1) were weighed into a reaction vessel. Then, 2 mL
of an equimolar solution of nucleophile (0.05 mmol) and benzyl alcohol
(0.05 mmol) as an internal reference in THF were added, the reaction
vessel was closed and agitated for 1 h using a shaker. The resin was filtered
off and the eluate was analyzed by gas chromatography.
Received: May 3, 2000 [Z15072]
[1] H. Zollinger, Diazo Chemistry, Vol. 1, VCH, Weinheim 1994.
[2] D. S. Wulfmanin The Chemistry of Diazonium and Diazo Groups,
Vol. 1 (Ed.: S. Patai), Wiley, New York 1978, pp. 247 ± 339.
[3] S. Bräse, A. de Meijere in Metal-catalyzed Cross-coupling Reactions
(Eds.: F. Diederich, P. J. Stang), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1998, p. 112.
[4] A. Engel, Methoden Org. Chem. (Houben-Weyl) 4th ed. 1952 ± ,
Vol. E 16a/2, 1990, pp. 1182 ± 1226.
Experimental Section
All resins were characterized by IR spectroscopy, and loadings and
conversions were evaluated by elemental analysis (C,H,N). Typical
loadings of the used chloromethylpolystyrene were between 0.6 and
1.4 mmolgÀ1. Chloromethylpolystyrene (Merrifield resin) was obtained
from Calbiochem-Novabiochem or Polymer Laboratories. The T2* resinis
[5] The chemistry of the hydrazo, azo and azoxy groups, Vol. 1 2 (Ed.: S.
Patai), Wiley, New York, 1975.
[6] R. Glaser, J. Horan, J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 7518 ± 7528.
[7] R. Glaser, J. Horan, H. Zollinger, Angew. Chem. 1997, 109,
2324 ± 2328; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 2210 ±
2213.
[8] S. Bräse, J. Köbberling, D. Enders, M. Wang, R. Lazny, S.
Brandtner, Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 2105 ± 2108.
[9] C. Colas, M. Goeldner, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 1357 ± 1366.
[10] R. Glaser, C. J. Horan, M. Lewis, H. Zollinger, J. Org. Chem.
1999, 64, 902 ± 913.
[11] C. G. Swain, J. E. Sheats, K. G. Harbison, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1975, 97, 783 ± 790.
[12] R. A. Bartsch in Crown ethersand analogs (Eds.: S. Patai, Z.
Rappoport), Wiley, Chichester, 1989, p. 505 ± 517. Although
a high excess of the crownether was used, the polymer-
bound diazonium salts could not be transformed into their
[18]crown-6 complexes quantitatively, because the complex-
ation constants are smaller than in the case of the
corresponding [21]crown-7 complexes. Therefore it is pos-
sible that [18]crown-6 was partly washed off the resin during
workup.
[13] M. L. Crossley, R. H. Kienle, C. H. Benbrook, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1940, 62, 1400 ± 1403. Usually anS N1-type mechanism is
considered, although there are indications for an SNAr-type
mechanism in the presence of nucleophiles.
[14] Experimentally examined loading of the resins correlate
well with the results from CHN combustionanalysis.
[15] K. J. Jensen, J. Alsina, M. F. Songster, J. Vagner, F. Albericio,
G. Barany, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5441 ± 5452.
[16] D. L. Flynn, R. V. Devraj, J. J. Parlow in Solid-Phase Organic
Synthesis (Ed.: K. Burgess), Wiley, New York, 2000,
pp. 149 ± 194.
Scheme 4. The T2* resin as a scavenger for amines, anilines, and phenols. The
percentage of removed nucleophile is given. Benzyl alcohol was used as an internal
standard. a) Resin 3 (2 equiv), base in THF, 1 h. Filtration of the resin and analysis of
the filtrate by gas chromatography. [a] Base: diethylaminomethylpolystyrene
(2 equiv, loading 2.33 mmolgÀ1). [b] Base: a basic ion-exchange resin (Merck Lewatit
MP 5080). [c] Base: finely powdered potassium hydroxide (4 ± 5 equiv).
[17] V. Austel in Combinatorial Chemistry (Ed.: G. Jung), Wiley-
VCH, Weinheim, 1999, pp. 77 ± 123.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, No. 20
ꢀ WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH, D-69451 Weinheim, 2000
1433-7851/00/3920-3683 $ 17.50+.50/0
3683