or protodeborylation occurring. Furthermore, slight modifica-
tions to the literature stoichiometries and other reaction
conditions decreased amidation times of the halogenated
arylboronic ester from overnight to a few hours (Scheme
3).17 Moreover, the amidation could be carried out on crude
2a generated from the Ir-catalyzed aromatic borylation of
1a, with pinacol borane (HBPin), catalytic [Ir(OMe)(COD)]2,
and dtbpy ligand.
esters on silica gel makes for a less than ideal protocol.
Therefore we investigated if the crude aromatic borylation/
amidation product could be adequately “cleaned-up” for the
oxidation step without actually needing to isolate the ami-
doarylboronic ester. Toward this end we were gratified that
passing the crude reaction mixture through a short plug of
silica gel provided a mixture that once evaporated could be
successfully subjected to the standard oxone conditions
(Table 1).17,19
With the one-pot borylation/amidation portion of the pro-
posed sequence in hand and optimized, we undertook con-
verting the amide-substituted arylboronic ester to the ami-
dophenol. Our previously developed one-pot catalytic aro-
matic borylation/oxidation used oxone as the oxidant.11 In
those oxidations, acetone was the standard solvent and the
reactions were typically run in the absence of any base or
buffer. Nonetheless, we had also shown ethereal solvents to
be acceptable and Webb and Levy employed NaHCO3 as
buffer in their original report.18 Thus, we expected that nei-
ther the solvent nor the Cs2CO3 used in the amidation step
would interfere with our plans to conclude the one-pot pro-
cess with the oxone oxidation of the crude amidation inter-
mediate (Scheme 2). This hypothesis proved incorrect as all
attempts at a strictly one-pot catalytic aromatic borylation/
amidation/oxidation failed to give any of the desired phenol.
We were able to determine that this failure stemmed from
the catalytic milieu and not the amidation intermediates, as
isolated 3a (see Scheme 3) could be oxidized to the phenol
with oxone in 95% yield. While a one-pot aromatic boryla-
tion/amidation followed by purification and then an oxidation
would make for a fairly efficient route to 5-substituted 3-ami-
dophenols, the poor resolution of amido-substituted boronic
Since the silica gel plug removed only insoluble solids
and the most polar salts, pinacol originating from the
borylation step remained in the final reaction mixture.
Separating the pinacol from the similarly polar 5-substituted
3-amidophenols can be difficult. To avoid this problem, the
final oxidation mixture was worked up with NaIO4 to destroy
the diol. In this way the pure phenols could readily be
obtained in undiminished isolated yields.
With the 3-step protocol in place, we surveyed the scope
of the sequence against a variety of haloarenes and amides
(Table 1).17 For electron-deficient arylbromides reacting with
primary amides (entries 1-7, 9, and 10), the process was
clean and relatively high yielding. Suzuki byproducts and
protodeborylation were minimal, if observed at all. A range
of electron-withdrawing groups at the 5-position was toler-
ated, including esters and chloride. Benzonitriles could also
be transformed into the desired products; however, [Ir(OMe)-
(COD)]2 and dtbpy proved the C-H activation catalyst/ligand
combination of choice for these substrates. For most other
substrates tested, the substitution of [Ir(OMe)(COD)]2 and
dtbpy for (Ind)Ir(COD) and dmpe netted little difference in
the overall process (Scheme 3 vs entry 1). That said, in the
case of methyl 3-bromobenzoate the efficiency of the overall
sequence was affected by incomplete borylation. Fortunately,
simply reacting this substrate in an open flask (nitrogen
atmosphere) under the [Ir(OMe)(COD)]2 conditions allowed
the borylation to run to full conversion (entries 5 and 6).
Presumably, inhibition of catalysis is avoided when the
hydrogen byproduct can escape.
In addition to carboxyamides, carbamates and ureas were
also suitable amide partners. Several entries from this group
of substrates merit additional comment. By employing Boc-
NH2 (entry 6) we could generate a carbamate protected AH-
BA from commercially available starting materials in compe-
titive overall yield. Additionally, entry 7 showed how a di-
substituted urea could be formed without the need to prepare
functionalized isocyanates.20 Acrylamides could also be used
in this process. However, with acrylamide itself the desired
product could only be isolated in 37% yield (entry 9),
whereas the more substituted tiglic amide was less prone to
side reactions and afforded the final product in a synthetically
useful 66% yield (entry 10).
(17) (a) See the Supporting Information for details. (b) General procedure
for one-pot C-H activation/borylation/amidation/oxidation: In a drybox,
arene (2.0 mmol), HBPin (1.5-2.0 equiv), 2 mol % of (Ind)Ir(COD) (or
1.5 mol % of [Ir(OMe)(COD)]2), and 2 mol % of dmpe (or 3 mol % of
dtbpy for reactions run with [Ir(OMe)(COD)]2) were transferred into an
air-free flask equipped with a stirrer bar. (In reactions where solvent is
needed, the reagents were dissolved in 1-6 mL of n-hexane and transferred
to the air-free flask.) The flask was sealed (unless otherwise noted), brought
out of the drybox, and placed in an oil bath preheated to 150 °C (or at
room temperature for reactions run with [Ir(OMe)(COD)]2). The reaction
was run at this temperature until judged complete by GC-FID. At that time,
the reaction was allowed to cool to room temperature. If solvent was used,
it was removed by a gentle nitrogen flow. The crude borylation mixture
was then pumped under high vacuum for several hours to remove the
excessive HBPin. The flask was then returned to the drybox and charged
with 1 mol % of Pd2dba3, 3 mol % of xantphos, amide (1.05-1.15 equiv),
Cs2CO3 (1.4 equiv), and 6 mL of THF or DME. The flask was sealed,
taken out of the box, and heated to the indicated temperature. The reaction
was stirred at this temperature until judged complete by GC-FID. At this
time, the reaction mixture (typically a yellow suspension) was then cooled
to room temperature and filtered through a silica pad (1-2 cm thick × 4.5
cm diameter; ∼12 g) eluting with acetone until the filtrate showed no UV
activity on TLC (ca. 150-200 mL). The acetone was evaporated and the
residue was dissolved back in 6 mL of acetone (or more if needed to obtain
a homogeneous solution). To that stirred solution was added dropwise an
aqueous solution of oxone (1.33 g (1.0 equiv) in 6 mL water) and the
resulting reaction was stirred for 10 min at room temperature. At that time
an aqueous suspension of NaIO4 (430 mg (1.0 equiv per pinacol mol equiv)
in 2 mL water) was added in a single portion followed by 2 mL of acetone.
The mixture was further stirred for 1-2 h before being twice extracted
with EtOAc. To the aqueous layer was then added solid NaHSO3, and the
mixture was swirled until color appeared and then diminished. The aqueous
phase was then back extracted once or twice with EtOAc. The combined
organics were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and concentrated.
The residue was purified on silica gel chromatography (3.5 cm wide, 25-
30 cm long), using CH2Cl2/EtOAc or CH2Cl2/acetone eluent. Evaporation
followed by drying under high vacuum afforded the final product.
Reactions of aryl bromides with electron-releasing or
neutral groups and reactions that employ secondary amides
(including lactams) tended to afford the products in lower
(19) The composition of the offending species removed by the silica gel
plug is uncertain at this time.
(20) Note: Reaction of the same substrate with PMBNH(CO)NH2
afforded the corresponding urea substituted phenol in only 19% yield along
with adventitious Suzuki products.
(18) Webb, K. S.; Levy, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 5117-5118.
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 7, 2006
1413