C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 1. Cyano-Ethoxycarbonylation on Various Catalystsa
to the neighbor of the acid site by silane-coupling reaction, and
the acid-base interaction decreases.
Among the solvents examined in the Michael reaction using SA-
NEt2, nonpolar solvents, such as toluene and diethyl ether, were
good solvents, whereas polar solvents DMF and DMSO gave poor
results with respect to conversion of the enone (SI). Interestingly,
this solvent effect of the SA-NEt2-catalyzed reaction shows a sharp
contrast to that using MgO as a typical solid base catalyst (SI),
and it is suggested that the Brønsted acid site on the SA surface,
which is deactivated by electron-donating solvents, plays a crucial
role in the catalysis of the SA-NR2. On the basis of these results,
a proposed reaction mechanism involves the dual activation of donor
and acceptor substrates at the amine base site and the neighboring
Brønsted acid site on the SA surface, respectively (Scheme 1C).
Initial rate kinetics of triethylamine-catalyzed cyanation of 1 with
2 indicates first-order dependence on the concentration of 1 and
zero-order dependence on 2, and the rate-determining step is the
carbon-carbon bond-forming step. On the other hand, the initial
rate in the SA-NR2-catalyzed reaction is zero-order dependence on
both 1 and 2. Activation of 1 by the acid site accelerated the
carbon-carbon bond-forming step, and another step in the catalytic
cycle became the new rate-determining step.
In summary, the use of acidic silica-alumina as a support for
basic amine catalyst enables coexistence of strong acid and base
sites on the solid surface with suitable distance. This SA-NR2
catalyst possessed high catalytic activities for various carbon-
carbon bond-forming reactions. The advanced solid-state NMR
analyses revealed that the basic amine groups were immobilized
at the neighboring position of the surface acid site without strong
acid-base interaction. This concept, a novel design method of
acid-base bifunctional solid surface, can be applied to creation of
new heterogeneous catalysts for efficient organic synthesis.
entry
catalyst
yield (%)
entry
catalyst
yield (%)
1
SA-NEt2
95
57
17
16
3
6
7
8
9
10
SA-NH2
Et3N + SA
Et3N + p-TsOH‚H2O
<1
70
<1
1
2b
3
SA(L)-NEt2
SiO2-NEt2
Al2O3-NEt2
USY-NEt2
4
5
Et3N
SA
<1
a See SI for the reaction rate and detailed reaction conditions. b SA having
low Al content (SA(L), SiO2, 82.5; Al2O3, 12.6%) was used as a support.
Table 2. Nitro-Aldol Reaction on Various Catalystsa
entry
catalyst
yield (%)
entry
catalyst
yield (%)
1
2
3
4
SA-NH2
SA-NEt2
SiO2-NH2
n-C6H13NH2 + SA
99
<1
37
5
n-C6H13NH2
+p-TsOH‚H2O
n-C6H13NH2
<1
6
7
13
<1
12
SA
a See SI for the reaction rate and detailed reaction conditions.
Figure 1. (A) 13C NMR spectra of DAPS in CDCl3. (B-D) Solid-state
13C MAS NMR spectra of (B) the SA-NEt2, (C) the SA treated with a
toluene solution of DAPS (room temp, 5 min), and (D) triethylamine
adsorbed on SA. O: signal assignable to the terminal carbon of amine.
Supporting Information Available: Details of experimental
procedures and characterizations. This material is available free of
Scheme 1
References
(1) (a) Yosikawa, N.; Yamada, Y. M. A.; Das, J.; Sasai, H.; Shibasaki, M. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4168. (b) Kanemasa, S.; Ito, K. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2004, 4741. (c) Ma, J.-A.; Cahard, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004,
43, 4566.
(2) Incompatible catalysts in separate materials: (a) Voit, B. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4238. (b) Cohen, B. J.; Kraus, M. A.; Patchornik, A. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 4165. (c) Gelman, F.; Blum, J.; Avnir, D.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3647. (d) Motokura, K.; Fujita, N.; Mori,
K.; Mizugaki, T.; Ebitani, K.; Kaneda, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
9674. (e) Helms, B.; Guillaudeu, S. J.; Xie, Y.; McMurdo, M.; Hawker,
C. J.; Fre´chet, J. M. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 6384.
(3) (a) Huh, S.; Chen, H.-T.; Wiench, J. W.; Pruski, M.; Lin, V. S.-Y. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1826. (b) Zeidan, R. K.; Hwang, S.-J.; Davis,
M. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 6332. (c) Bass, J. D.; Solovyov,
A.; Pascall, A. J.; Katz, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 3737.
(4) Silica-supported amine catalysts: (a) Choudary, B. M.; Kantam, M. L.;
Sreekanth, P.; Bandopadhyay, T.; Figueras, F.; Tuel, A. J. Mol. Catal. A
1999, 142, 361. (b) Macquarrie, D. J.; Maggi, R.; Mazzacani, A.; Sartori,
G.: Sartorio, R. Appl. Catal. A 2003, 246, 183. (c) Wang, X.; Lin, K. S.
K.; Chan, J. C. C.; Cheng, S. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 1763. (d)
Yokoi, T.; Yoshitake, H.; Yamada, T.: Kubota, Y.; Tatsumi, T. J. Mater.
Chem. 2006, 16, 1125.
NMR chemical shifts of the terminal carbon of amine. After the
immobilization of the 3-(diethylamino)propane functional group on
the SA surface, the upfield shift of the terminal carbon was observed
(from 11.9 to 9.5 ppm, Figure 1A,B). In comparison, the signal
assignable to the terminal carbon of triethylamine adsorbed on the
SA surface showed larger upfield shift (from 11.8 to 7.5 ppm, Figure
1D). These results indicate that the acid-buffering effect to the basic
amine of the SA-supported catalyst is smaller than that of the
mixture of SA and free amine,8,9 which agrees with the higher
catalytic activity of the immobilized catalyst compared to that of
the mixture. To monitor the generation process of the surface active
site, the solid SA was separated from the toluene solution of DAPS
before heat treatment in the SA-NEt2 catalyst preparation, and then
we conducted the 13C solid-state NMR analysis: the large upfield
shift of the terminal carbon of amine was also observed (∼8.0 ppm,
Figure 1C). The immobilization process is proposed, as shown in
Scheme 1: (A) an amine group adsorbs on the surface acid site
with strong acid-base interaction; (B) the amine is immobilized
(5) (a) Yamagiwa, N.; Tian, J.; Matsunaga, S.; Shibasaki, M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 3413. (b) Lundgren, S.; Wingstrand, E.; Penhoat, M.;
Moberg, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 11592.
(6) (a) Macquarrie, D. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 4125. (b) Picquet, M.;
Bruneau, C.; Dixneuf, P. H. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 3937. (c) Stark, M.
A.; Jones, G.; Richards, C. J. Organometallics 2000, 19, 1282.
(7) The primary amine shows higher catalytic activity than that of the tertiary
amine; see: Demicheli, G.; Maggi, R.; Mazzacani, A.; Righi, P.; Sartori,
G.; Bigi, F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 2401.
(8) The 13C NMR signal of the terminal carbon of triethylamine shifts upfield
by protonation, for example, 11.8 (free NEt3) to 8.84 ppm (NEt3‚HCl).
(9) The IR spectra of catalysts also indicate weak interaction of immobilized
amines and surface acid sites (SI), which suggests that the surface acid
sites on the SA act as active sites.
JA0704333
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 129, NO. 31, 2007 9541