A. Tra¨ff et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 692 (2007) 5529–5531
5531
lective exchange reaction of the H20 and H60 ortho hydro-
gens of 6a (Scheme 3). A possible explanation [15,16] for
this regioselectivity of 2b is a preferential formation of a
five-membered ring intermediate of the iridium atom with
the nitrogen atom and carbon atom 60 (upper part of 6c).
Crabtree’s catalyst 1 mediates the exchange of these ortho
protons (i.e. H20 and H60) as well as the ortho protons of
the aniline part (i.e. H2 and H6), thus exchange a total
of four protons (entry 2, Table 2). This indicates that 1 is
able to react via the above described five membered ring
intermediate, and also via a six-membered intermediate
involving the iridium atom, the carbon atom C6 and the
carbonyl oxygen (lower part of 6c) [15,16].
D
O
O
tBu2P
Ir
PtBu2
FG
10b
H
9a
reductive
elimination
oxidative
addition
O
O
H
O
O
tBu2P
PtBu2
H
Ir
tBu2P
Ir
PtBu2
D
9e
D
D
9b
FG
In summary, we have shown for the first time that irid-
ium pincer complexes 2a–4a are able to catalyze HIE
exchange for aromatic substrates 5a and 6a under mild
conditions. The exchange reaction takes place with a high
regioselectivity for labelling of 6a. Our studies also suggest
that the catalytic activity and selectivity of the pincer com-
plex catalysts can be fine tuned by changing of the elec-
tronic properties of the complex. Considering the above
application of iridium pincer complexes represent an inter-
esting alternative for the use of mono and bidentate iridium
complexes for HIE reaction of drug like molecules.
reductive
elimination
isomerization
HD
substrate coordination
and CH-activation
O
O
O
O
D
tBu2P
Ir
PtBu2
tBu2P
PtBu2
Ir
H
D
9c
H
9d
FG
FG
10a
Acknowledgements
Scheme 4.
The author thank Dr. Claes Landersjo¨ for NMR-assis-
tance and AstraZeneca R&D Mo¨lndal for providing mate-
rials and facilities for the project. This work was also
supported by the Swedish Research Council (VR).
incorporation with the methoxy substituted pincer complex
3b and the pentafluoro phenyl substituted complex 4b
(Scheme 1). Using 5a as substrate, application of both elec-
tron donating (3b) and electron withdrawing (4b) substitu-
ents in 2b leads to a decrease of the catalytic activity (entry
1, Table 2) in H/D exchange. Similarly, the methoxy com-
plex 3b is less efficient for HIE with 6a than with 2b, how-
ever, complex 4b appeared to be somewhat more reactive in
deuterium exchange with 6a than with the parent complex
2b (entry 2, Table 2). Similarly to 2b complexes 3b and 4b
are inactive for HIE of substrates 7 and 8.
References
[1] R. Crabtree, Acc. Chem. Res. 12 (1979) 331.
[2] R. Salter (Ed.), Synthesis and Applications of Isotopically Labelled
Compounds, Wiley, New York, 2001.
[3] G.J. Ellames, Tetrahedron 57 (2001) 9487.
[4] D. Morales-Morales, C.M. Jensen (Eds.), The Chemistry of Pincer
Compounds, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007.
Skaddan and Bergman [17] studied the mechanistic
aspects of the iridium catalyzed HIE reactions, showing
[17] that the non-selective HIE reaction proceeds via irid-
ium (III)/iridium (V) intermediates. Based on these results
a plausible catalytic cycle is proposed for the above pre-
sented (Schemes 2 and 3 and Table 2) pincer complex cat-
alyzed processes (Scheme 4). Accordingly, the activated
intermediate 9a undergoes oxidative addition with deute-
rium gas affording complex 9b. Subsequently, reductive
elimination of HD provides deutero complex 9c, which oxi-
datively activates the carbon hydrogen bond of the aro-
matic substrate 10a to form complex 9d. After
isomerization of 9d to 9e a reductive elimination affords
the deuterated product 10b recovering catalyst 9a. Conver-
sion of 9c to 9d is probably the most interesting step of the
catalytic cycle determining the regioselectivity of the HIE
process. As we pointed out complex 2b induces a regiose-
[5] J.T. Singleton, Tetrahedron 59 (2003) 1837.
[6] D. Milstein, M. van der Boom, Chem. Rev. 103 (2003) 1759.
[7] C.J. Moulton, B.L. Shaw, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. (1976)
1020.
[8] M. Gupta, C. Hagen, R.J. Flesher, W. Kaska, C.M. Jensen, J. Chem.
Soc., Chem Commun. (1996) 2083.
[9] K. Wang, M.E. Goldman, T.J. Emge, A.S. Goldman, J. Organomet.
Chem. 518 (1996) 55.
[10] W. Leitner, C. Six, Chem. Ber./Receueil. 130 (1997) 555.
[11] I. Go¨ttker-Schnetmann, P. White, M. Brookhart, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
126 (2004) 1804.
[12] K. Zhu, P.D. Achord, X. Zhang, K. Krogh-Jespersen, A.S. Goldman,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 (2004) 13044.
[13] J. Zhao, A.S. Goldman, J.F. Hartwig, Science 307 (2005) 1080.
[14] D. Morales-Morales, R. Redo´n, C. Yung, C.M. Jensen, Inorg. Chim.
Acta 357 (2004) 2953.
[15] M. Lavin, E.M. Holt, R.H. Crabtree, Organomtallics 8 (1989) 99.
[16] A.Y.L. Shu, W. Chen, J.R. Heys, J. Organomet. Chem. 524 (1996)
87.
[17] M.B. Skaddan, R.G. Bergman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 (2004) 13033.