(38 g/100 g propanol). Thus, more water was introduced into
the system using isopropanol to dissolve a given amount of
KOH, resulting in an increase of the Br content. What’s more,
as the solubility of KOH in iso-propanol is relatively low,
more iso-propanol must be used to dissolve the required
KOH, elevating the price of the process. The results indicate
that ethanol and propanol are both good solvents for this
method. However, ethanol is the optimistic choice due to its
low toxicity, low cost and ease of separation from the product.
The solubility of KOH in propanol and iso-propanol was
measured, as described in the ESI.w
complementary synthetic route to the previous existing
strategies, as mentioned in the Introduction, to prepare
various ILs.
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by the National Basic
Research Program of China (2007CB613300), the Natural
Science Foundation of China (20906045), Doctoral Funding
(20090091120033) and the Scientific Research Foundation for
Returned Scholars of Ministry of Education of China.
Although IL synthesis by neutralizing [Rmim]OH with
the desired acid has been reported,17–19 the preparation
of [Rmim]OH in this study is different. Compared to the
reported processes, it is not only an alternative process
for [Rmim]OH solution preparation, but also has several
advantages.
References
1 J. S. Wilkes, Green Chem., 2002, 4, 73–80.
2 W. Ogihara, H. Kosukegawa and H. Ohno, Chem. Commun., 2006,
3637–3639.
3 T. Y. Kim, W. J. Kim, S. H. Hong, J. E. Kim and K. S. Suh,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 3806–3809.
The full process is time saving. The reactions of eqn (3) and
eqn (4) can finish in minutes. Thus, the time needed for the
reaction takes only around 0.5 h. Taking the separation time
into consideration, the whole process composed of eqn (3) and
eqn (4) take a total of about 4 h starting from [Rmim]X.
4 S. G. Liang, H. Z. Liu, Y. X. Zhou, T. Jiang and B. X. Han, New J.
Chem., 2010, 34, 2534–2536.
5 H. Li, Z. S. Hou, Y. X. Qiao, B. Feng, Y. Hu, X. R. Wang and
X. G. Zhao, Catal. Commun., 2010, 11, 470–475.
6 A. V. M. Nunes, A. P. C. Almeida, S. R. Marques, A. R. S. de
Sousa, T. Casimiro and C. M. M. Duarte, J. Supercrit. Fluids,
2010, 54, 357–361.
7 K. R. Seddon, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 1997, 68, 351–356.
8 R. Bogel-Lukasik, L. M. N. Goncalves and E. Bogel-Lukasik,
Green Chem., 2010, 12, 1947–1953.
9 B. Mallick, B. Balke, C. Felser and A. V. Mudring, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 7635–7638.
10 C. C. Cassol, G. Ebeling, B. Ferrera and J. Dupont, Adv. Synth.
Catal., 2006, 348, 243–248.
Meanwhile for the traditional two-step method, the reaction in
21,32
eqn (2) in Scheme 1 alone takes 12 h31 or 24 h,
or even
3 d.22 Taking the separation time in consideration, this process
will take a much longer time. What’s more, even after a 24 h
reaction, the halide content is still 3–4%.
The whole process is green. Only ethanol and water are
necessary as solvents. What’s more, the ethanol can even be
recycled after de-watering. This is in accordance with the
concept of green chemistry. While in the traditional two-step
method, the second step is usually carried out in volatile or
toxic solvents such as acetonitrile,32 dichloromethane33 or
acetone,34 making it environment unfriendly.35
11 K. R. Seddon, A. Stark and M. J. Torres, Pure Appl. Chem., 2000,
72, 2275–2287.
12 Z. P. Li, Z. Y. Du, Y. L. Gu, L. Y. Zhu, X. P. Zhang and
Y. Q. Deng, Electrochem. Commun., 2006, 8, 1270–1274.
13 J. Kiefer and C. C. Pye, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2010, 114, 6713–6720.
14 J. A. Whitehead, G. A. Lawrance and A. McCluskey, Aust. J.
Chem., 2004, 57, 151–155.
15 M. Egashira, Y. Yamamoto, T. Fukutake, N. Yoshimoto and
M. Morita, J. Fluorine Chem., 2006, 127, 1261–1264.
16 B. Clare, A. Sirwardana and D. R. MacFarlane, in Ionic Liquids,
Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, 2009, p. 40.
17 S. Himmler, A. Konig and P. Wasserscheid, Green Chem., 2007, 9,
935–942.
18 A. J. Carmichael, M. Deetlefs, M. J. Earle, U. Frohlich and
K. R. Seddon, Ionic Liquids as Green Solvents: Progress and
Prospects, ACS Symposium Series, American Chemical Society,
Washington, DC, 2003.
19 K. Fukumoto, M. Yoshizawa and H. Ohno, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2005, 127, 2398–2399.
Another advantage is that the synthesis process is easy to
carry out. Only operations such as mixing, stirring and filter-
ing are used. Thus, this process can be easily carried out at low
cost with instruments common to most labs. Thus, this process
has the potential to be adopted widely in the field of IL
synthesis.
Furthermore, many other precursors with various imid-
azolium cations can be prepared by this method and then be
used to synthesize the final IL, since [Rmim]X can be obtained
simply by the direct alkylation of 1-methylimidazole or
1,2-dimethylimidazole with the corresponding 1-chloroalkane
or 1-bromothane.25 Therefore, this process can be used to
synthesize a wide range of ILs.
20 W. Ogihara, M. Yoshizawa and H. Ohno, Chem. Lett., 2002,
880–881.
21 P. A. Z. Suarez, S. Einloft, J. E. L. Dullius, R. F. de Souza and
J. Dupont, J. Chim. Phys. Phys.-Chim. Biol., 1998, 95, 1626–1639.
22 J. Fuller, R. T. Carlin and R. A. Osteryoung, J. Electrochem. Soc.,
1997, 144, 3881–3886.
4. Conclusion
23 M. J. Earle, C. M. Gordon, N. V. Plechkova, K. R. Seddon and
T. Welton, Anal. Chem., 2007, 79, 4247–4247.
In summary, a quick and green method to prepare [Rmim]OH
solutions is described. In this method, the quick exchange
procedure of Xꢀ and OHꢀ in ethanol is fully utilized, and the
halogen can be removed by the precipitation of KX from the
ethanol. Furthermore, based on [Rmim]OH, several ILs were
synthesized. The results of 1H-NMR and elemental analysis of
the final product showed that the obtained samples were the
products supposed. Therefore, this method coupled with
[Rmim]X preparation and the hydroxide anion route is a
24 M. Galinski, A. Lewandowski and I. Stepniak, Electrochim. Acta,
2006, 51, 5567–5580.
25 P. Bonhote, A. P. Dias, M. Armand, N. Papageorgiou,
K. Kalyanasundaram and M. Gratzel, Inorg. Chem., 1998, 37,
166–166.
26 A. Stark, P. Behrend, O. Braun, A. Muller, J. Ranke,
B. Ondruschka and B. Jastorff, Green Chem., 2008, 10, 1152–1161.
27 Y. N. Ni and A. G. Wu, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1999, 390, 117–123.
28 P. H. Sanderson, Biochem. J, 1952, 52, 502–505.
29 T. S. Prokopov, Microchim. Acta, 1968, 56, 401–404.
30 G. Gran, Acta Chem. Scand., 1950, 4, 559–577.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2011
New J. Chem., 2011, 35, 1661–1666 1665