Molecules 2016, 21, 61
5 of 6
1-(4,5-Dichloro-9,10-dihydro-9,10-ethanoanthracen-11-yl)-N-methylmethanamine (
5). In two-necked
round-bottomed flask (40 mg 10% Pd/C) was wetted with methanol and the flask was evacuated,
then flushed with hydrogen two times, then a solution of (100 mg, 0.33 mmol) aldehyde ( ) in (5 mL)
3
methanol was added to the reaction mixture followed by the addition of (0.5 mL, 2 M) solution
of methylamine in methanol. The mixture was stirred for 4 hours at room temperature under H2
atmosphere (balloon). The reaction mixture was filtered through a pad of celite and the solvent was
˝
5 as white powder. mp 290 C; IR
removed in vacuo to yield (90 mg, 85%) of the corresponding amine
KBr):
´
1 1
(
ν
= 3440, 2942,2864, 2775, 1592, 1457, 1410, 1026, 936, 755, 742, 555 cm ; H-NMR (CDCl ,
3
4
5
00 MHz)
δ
= 1.27–1.37( m, 1H, H-12 ), 2.13–2.19 (m, 1H, H-12), 2.47–2.50 (m, 1H, H-11), 2.55–2.66 (m,
H, CH -N-CH ), 4.31 (t, J = 2.5, 1H, H-9), 4.63 (d, J = 2.0, 1H, H-10), 6.98–7.05 (m, 3 H, ArH), 7.17–7.19
2
3
13
(m; 2 H, ArH), 7.45–7.48 (m; 1 H, ArH); C-NMR (CDCl , 125 MHz)
δ
= 33.2, 33.9, 35.9, 43.7, 46.0,
3
+
5
4.7, 123.3, 123.5, 123.8, 125.6, 125.9, 126.0, 126.4, 139.3, 142.7, 142.9, 143.5. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 317 [M]
(not recorded), 306 (7), 305 (22), 251 (75), 250 (100), 220 (7), 219 (22), 179 (5), 179 (4), 178 (13), 111 (8).
1
-(1,8-Dichloro-9,10-dihydro-9,10-ethanoanthracen-11-yl)-N-methylmethanamine ( ). In two-necked
round-bottomed flask (40 mg 10% Pd/C) was wetted with methanol and the flask was evacuated,
then flushed with hydrogen two times, then a solution of (100 mg, 0.33 mmol) aldehyde ( ) in (5 mL)
methanol was added to the reaction mixture followed by the addition of (0.5 mL, 2 M) solution of
methylamine in methanol. The mixture was stirred for 4 h at room temperature under H atmosphere
6
4
2
(
balloon). The reaction mixture was filtered through a pad of celite and the solvent was removed
˝
in vacuo to yield (90 mg, 85%) of the corresponding amine (
6
) as white powder. mp 310 C; IR
´
1 1
(KBr):
ν
= 3435, 2943, 2774, 1626, 1593, 1457, 1411, 1027, 937, 758, 742, 555 cm ; H-NMR (CDCl ,
3
5
5
2
00 MHz)
δ
= 1.24–1.26 (m, 1H, H-12), 2.04–2.08 (m, 1H, H-12), 2.38–2.40 (m, 1H, H-11), 2.45–2.54 (m,
H-CH -N-CH ), 4.21 (broad s, 1H, H-10), 4.52 (broad s, 1H, H-9), 6.98–7.05 (m, 3H, ArH), 7.17–7.19 (m,
2
3
13
H, ArH), 7.42–7.43 (m, 1H, ArH); C-NMR (CDCl , 125 MHz) δ = 33.1, 33.6, 35.5, 43.5, 45.8, 54.3, 123.4,
23.5, 123.8, 125.6, 126.0, 126.1, 126.5, 139.1, 142.4, 142.8, 143.4; MS (EI) m/z (%) = 318 (100) [M + H]+
3
1
,
+
2
84 (22), 186(15), 117 (53); HRMS (EI) Calcd. for C H NCl [M] 318.0816, Found 318.0809.
18
18
2
3
.3. Assessment of Antidepressant Activity Using Forced Swimming Test
To test for the presence of anti-depressant activity of the test compounds (
3), (4), (5
) and (6).
The forced swimming test described previously by David et al. [11] was used with very slightly
modification regarding the dimension of the vessel used as a swimming pool. This vessel consisted
of a glass cylinder having an internal diameter of 25 cm and water depth of 15 cm and maintained
˝
at 22 ˘ 2 C. Swiss white mice weighing 25 g each were divided into 21 groups (n = 4). One group
served as control vehicle and the others divided for each test compound and maprotiline.
The test compounds and maprotiline were dissolved in DMSO and examined at 4 dose levels 10,
2
0, 40, 80 mg/kg (i.p.). The compounds and maprotiline were administered 20 min before starting the
swimming test. The control group was administered the vehicle only in the same volume. Each mouse
was allowed to stay in the swimming pool for 6 min. Mice normally swim for 1–2 min and then
turn helpless and become immobile. An immobile mouse is considered the one that does not show
any swimming attempt but shows only movements that allows it to keep its head above the surface
of the water. Counting of the time of immobility started at the beginning of the third minutes of
placing the mouse into the swimming pool and ended by the end of the sixth minute. In this test
antidepressant drugs decrease time of immobility. Thus, for each test compound dose, the time of
immobility was calculated. The means
˘
SEM values were calculated for each group. The data
were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnet’s multiple comparison test. p < 0.05 was
considered to be statistically significant.The percentage decreases in immobility times induced by each
doses were calculated.