D. Rambabu et al. / Tetrahedron Letters xxx (2017) xxx–xxx
3
Table 1
reaction time (entries 2, 3, 4, 6 and 9 in Table S1) as compared to
the electron-donating groups (entry 5 and 10 in Table S1). In addi-
tion, the catalytic activity was extended to various aldehydes with
ethyl cyanoacetate and showed high activity (entries 7–11). Elec-
tron-withdrawing derivatives, such as 4-nitrobenzaldehyde (entry
9) along with the electron-donating derivatives, such as 4-hydrox-
ybenzaldehyde (entry 7), showed satisfactory yields of 95–98%. To
our pleasure, the electron-withdrawing group gave the products in
shorter time as compared to the electron-donating groups. These
results suggest that Mn-MOF@Pi composite successfully promoted
the Knoevenagel condensation reactions of various aldehydes hav-
ing either electron-withdrawing groups or electron-donating
groups.
Optimization conditions for the Knoevenagel condensation reaction.a
Entry
Solvent
Time(h)
Yield (%)b
c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Water
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
–
Methanol
Ethanol
DMF
Acetonitrile
Chloroform
THF
95
75
65
35
30
25
15
98
Reusability of Mn-MOF@Pi
Toluene
Water
In addition to above studies we also investigated the reusability
of Mn-MOF@Pi composite. Interestingly, Mn-MOF@Pi also showed
excellent reusability as catalyst without significant decrease in its
activity. For reusability of the Mn-MOF@Pi catalyst, we reused the
same catalyst in four cycles of para-methoxy benzaldehyde and
malononitrile condensation reaction and even after fourth cycle
the time taken to complete the reaction was 2 h which was equiv-
alent to the time taken by the catalyst during first cycle (Fig. 1),
thus, indicated not any significant loss in the activity of the catalyst
and the catalyst can be reused for the Knoevenagel condensation
reaction. The stability of the reused catalyst after 4th cycle was
confirmed by FTIR (Fig. S6), powder XRD (Fig. S7) and SEM
(Fig. 2) analysis, which showed that the chemical nature of the cat-
alyst remains similar, even after the 4th cycle.
a
Reaction conditions: Mn-MOF@Pi (10 mg), Aldehyde (1 mmol), Active methy-
lene compound (1.5 mmol) in 2 ml solvent at room temperature (RT).
b
Isolated yield.
No catalyst was used.
c
NMR spectra of reaction mixture was taken after fixed interval of
time and dibromomethane was used as an internal standard.
Proposed mechanism for Knoevenagel condensation over Mn-MOF@Pi
Knoevenagel condensation reactions can be catalyzed by bases,
acids or materials containing both acidic and basic sites.16–25
Metal-carboxylate based MOFs possess ‘‘Mn+–O2– Lewis acid–base’’
pair and participate in the Knoevenagel catalysis through deproto-
nation, aldol and dehydration steps.23,24 We propose the following
mechanism (Scheme S1) for the Knoevenagel condensation with
Mn-MOF@Pi. The activation of the carbonyl group of benzaldehyde
proceeds at the Lewis acid site (stage 1).23,24 Simultaneously, the
basic site of the Mn-MOF@Pi leads to removal of acidic proton of
methylene group of malononitrile with generation of a carbanion.
The carbanion reacts with the carbonyl of benzaldehyde to give
intermediate (I).23,24 Afterwards, in intermediate (I) there occurs
a rearrangement with removal of water molecule (stage 3), leading
to formation of condensation product. Simultaneously, In addition
to metal-carboxylate of Mn-MOF@Pi, piperidine (Pi) is also act as
catalyst which is present in the Mn-MOF@Pi composite and it is
well known base catalyst for the Knoevenagel condensation reac-
tion26 (Scheme S1). Due to presence of piperidine, the Knoevenagel
condensation catalytic activity of catalyst Mn-MOF@Pi further
increases.
Comparison with different catalysts
We have compared the catalytic activity of Mn-MOF@Pi com-
posite with Mn-MOF and desolvated Mn-MOF. The result showed
that the rate of the reaction was fast in case of Mn-MOF@Pi com-
posite compared to native Mn-MOF (Fig. 3). However the catalytic
activity was moderate in the case of D_Mn-MOF due to the
increase of pore size after the removal of solvent. Therefore, the
improved catalytic activity of Mn-MOF@Pi (over D-Mn-MOF) could
also be due to the combined catalytic effects of Mn-MOF and piper-
idine incorporated in it. We also compared the catalytic efficiency
of the Mn-MOF@Pi with various MOFs that have been utilized for
condensation of benzaldehyde and malononitrile and the results
are shown in Table S2. In comparison to reported MOF systems,
Scope of the catalytic Knoevenagel condensation activity with Mn-
MOF@Pi
After optimizing the reaction conditions in hand, Mn-MOF@Pi
used as catalyst on variety of different aldehydes and active
methylene compounds listed in Table S1. It was found that Mn-
MOF@Pi exhibits good catalytic activity and desired products were
obtained in good yields (Table S1). In addition to this, we observed
that aldehydes readily undergo condensation with malononitrile
compared with ethyl cyanoacetate (Table S1). This may be due to
the fact that abstraction of a proton from the active methylene
group of ethyl cyanoacetate is difficult due to lower acidity com-
pared to malononitrile. The catalytic activity of Mn-MOF@Pi was
also affected by substituent group present on the aromatic ring
of aldehyde.
The electron-withdrawing groups present on aromatic aldehy-
des promoted this condensation efficiently with reduction in the
Fig. 1. Recyclability of the catalyst Mn-MOF@Pi was tested for the condensation of
para-methoxy benzaldehyde and malononitrile in water at RT (2 h time duration).