Page 3 of 4
ChemComm
Table 1 Enantioselective sorption of 1-D (1-L) toward racemic 1-
phenethylalcohol and methyl lactate a
Entry
Substrate
Adsorbent
DOI: 10.1039/C4CC09821H
OH
1
20.3 (S)
1-L
1-D
1-L
1-D
OH
2
3
4
21.2 (R)
33.0 (S)
34.8 (R)
OH
O
O
OH
O
O
Figure 6. The N2 sorption isotherms of 1-D at 77k.
a For details, see the Experimental section in ESI. b Determined by
GC (letters in brackets specify the preferable isomer), and the
deviations for the ee values are less than 5%.
KCl plates between 200 and 600 nm are performed to further
demonstrate the homochirality of 1-D and 1-L (Figure 5). The
CD spectrum for the bulk sample of 1-D exhibits an obvious
positive CD signal at 243 nm, revealing its homochiral nature. A
mirror image is observed for 1-L, confirming that compounds 1-
D and 1-L are enantiomers.
aState Key Laboratory of Structural Chemistry, Fujian Institute of
40 Research on the Structure of Matter, the Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Fuzhou, Fujian 350002, P. R. China. E-mail: zhj@fjirsm.ac.cn
bDepartment of Chemistry, Zunyi Normal College, Zunyi, Guizhou
563002, P. R. China.
5
45 † Synthesis of [Cd9((R)-PIA)6(TIB)4(H2O)12].3H2O (1-D) : the mixture of
Cd(CH3COO)2·2H2O (0.2 mmol, 0.053 g), (R)-H3PIA (0.032 g, 0.1 mmol),
TIB (0.2 mmol, 0.055 g), DMF (3 ml) and H2O (1 ml) was sealed in a 20
ml vial and heated to 100 oC for 3 days. After cooling to room-
temperature, the colourless polyhedral crystals 1-D were separated from
50 the mixture by filtration (Yield: 42%). Similar procedure was used to
synthesis compound 1-L (Yield: 45%).
The co-existenc of cages and helical channels in the structure
of 1-D makes it a porous framework with solvent accessible
volume of about 49.2% per unit cell as calculated by PLATON.
10 The permanent porosity of 1-D was further demonstrated by the
N2 gas sorption at 77K. The desolvated sample of 1-D shows
type-I sorption isotherms (Figure 6), and the Langmuir and
Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface areas for 1-D are 1327.9
m2/g and 955.8 m2/g, respectively. To the best of our knowledge,
15 HMOFs with such high surface area are rarely reported.
The presence of high porosity in 1-D (1-L) prompts us to
explore their application on enantioselective separation of
racemic compounds. After screening some racemic alcohols, our
studies identified that 1-D (1-L) can enantioselectively separate
20 1-phenethylalcohol and methyl lactate (Table 1, Figures S6-7). It
is obvious that 1-D has high affinity to (R)-phenethylalcohol or
(R)-methyl lactate and 1-L is good for (S)-phenethylalcohol or
(S)-methyl lactate. Such enantioselective adsorption should be
attributed to hydrogen-bonding interactions between the
25 framework and racemic agents that make the corresponding chiral
molecules orderly dock in the chiral channels.8
In summary, by employment of a pair of predesigned proline
derivative ligands ((R)-PIA and (S)-PIA) to assemble with TIB
and Cd2+ ion, a pair of HMOFs with permanent porosity were
30 successfully synthesized. It is unusual that the cages and helical
channels are presented in the homochiral framework together.
Both HMOFs have promising application on enantioselective
separation of racemic alcohols. The results reveal a successful
strategy on the construction of stable HMOFs with high porosity
35 via organic ligands integreting rigid and flexible parts.
‡ Crystal data for 1-D: C48H36Cd3N10O18, M = 1378.10, Cubic, a = b = c =
29.59550(10) Å, V = 25922.51(15) Å3, T = 100(2) K, space group P4332,
Z = 12, 12945 reflections measured, 4716 independent reflections (Rint
=
55 0.0354). The final R1 value was 0.0557 (I > 2σ(I)). The final wR(F2) value
was 0.1518 (I > 2σ(I)).The final R1 value was 0.0816 (all data). The final
wR(F2) value was 0.1663 (all data). The goodness of fit on F2 was 0.982
and the Flack parameter was 0.001(14).
§
Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: [Experimental
60 details, IR spectra, TGA, powder X-ray diffraction patterns, and CIF file
(CCDC-1031194 (1-D) ]. See DOI: 10.1039/b000000x/
1.
(a) J. S. Seo, D. Whang, H. Lee, S. I. Jun, J. Oh, Y. J. Jeon and K.
Kim, Nature, 2000, 404, 982; (b) L. Ma, C. Abney and W. B. Lin,
Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 1248; (c) S. M. Xie, Z. J. Zhang, Z. Y.
Wang and L. M. Yuan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 11892; (d)
W. Zhang and R. G. Xiong, Chem. Rev., 2012, 112, 1163; (e) Y.
Liu, W. M. Xuan and Y. Cui, Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 4112; (f) M.
Zhao, S. Ou and C. D. Wu, Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 1199.
(a) P. Li, Y. B. He, J. Guang, L. H. Weng, J. C. G. Zhao, S. C.
Xiang and B. L. Chen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 547; (b) M.
Yoon, R. Srirambalaji and K. Kim, Chem. Rev., 2012, 112, 1196. (c)
K. Mo, Y. H. Yang and Y. Cui, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 1746.
(d) X. Jing, C. He, D. P. Dong, L. L. Yan and C. Y. Duan, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 10127–10131;
65
70
2.
75 3.
(a) S. M. Shin, D. Y. Moon, K. J. Jeong, J. Kim, P. K. Thallapally
and N. Jeong, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 9402; (b) S. Regati, Y. B.
He, M. Thimmaiah, P. Li, S. C. Xiang, B. L. Chen and J. C. G.
Zhao, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 9836; (c) M. L. Sun, J. Zhang, Q.
P. Lin, P. X. Yin and Y. G. Yao, Inorg. Chem., 2010, 49, 9257; (d)
D. N. Dybtsev, A. L. Nuzhdin, H. Chun, K. P. Bryliakov, E. P.
Talsi, V. P. Fedln and K. Kim, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2006, 45,
916; (e) J. Zhang, S. M. Chen, A. Zingiryan and X. H. Bu, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 17246.
We thank the support of this work by 973 program
(2012CB821705), and NSFC (21425102, 21221001, 21173224).
80
Notes and references
4.
(a) C. D. Wu, A. G. Hu, L. Zhang and W. B. Lin, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2005, 127, 8940; (b) S. C. Sahoo, T. Kundu and R. Banerjee,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 17950; (c) K. Mo, Y. H. Yang and Y.
85
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry [year]
Journal Name, [year], [vol], 00–00 | 3