2
A.C. Gomes et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry xxx (2013) 1e7
liquid as a solvent. Additionally, a new approach for the immobi-
lization of cyclopentadienyl molybdenum tricarbonyl complexes is
reported, based on the intercalation of 1 in a layered double
hydroxide.
residue (NaCp) washed with anhydrous n-pentane (2 ꢂ 15 mL) and
vacuum-dried. NaCp was treated overnight with Mo(CO) (5.40 g,
20.4 mmol) in refluxing THF (60 mL). The resultant reaction
mixture was cooled to room temperature and ClCH CONH (1.91 g,
0.4 mmol) in THF (60 mL) added. After stirring at room temper-
6
2
2
2
2
. Experimental
ature for 2 h, the brown suspension was vacuum-dried and the
resultant residue extracted with chloroform. The chloroform frac-
tions were combined and evaporated to dryness, giving CpMo(-
2.1. Materials and methods
CO)
3
CH
2
COONH
2
, which was subsequently treated with water
ꢁ
Microanalyses for CHN and ICP-OES analysis for Mo were
(34 mL) and HCl (37%, 12 mL, ca. 140 mmol) at 80 C for 1 h.
determined by C.A.C.T.I., University of Vigo. Powder X-Ray diffrac-
tion (XRD) data were collected at room temperature on an X’pert
CpMo(CO)
was filtered, washed with water, vacuum-dried, and recrystallized
from chloroform (1.30 g, 21%, relative to Mo(CO) ). Anal. Calcd for
MoO (304.11): C, 39.50; H, 2.65. Found: C, 39.2; H, 2.65. FT-IR
3 2
CH COOH (1) precipitated as a yellow powder, which
MPD Philips diffractometer with a curved graphite monochromator
6
ꢀ
(
Cu-K
a
radiation,
l
¼ 1.54060 A) and a flat-plate sample holder, in a
C
10
H
8
5
ꢀ
1
BraggeBrentano para-focusing optics configuration (45 kV, 50 mA).
Samples were step-scanned in 0.02 2
(KBr, cm ):
2524 (w), 2025 (vs,
(vs, (CO)), 1647 (vs,
n
¼ 3438 (br), 3120 (w), 2935 (w), 2784 (w), 2624 (w),
(CO)), 1949 (vs, (CO)), 1931 (vs, (CO)), 1908
(C]O)), 1427 (m), 1416 (m), 1283 (vs, (CeO)),
ꢁ
q
steps with a counting time
n
n
n
of 50 s per step. SEM with coupled EDS was carried out on a Hitachi
SU-70 (S-4100) instrument using a 15 kV accelerating voltage.
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed using a Shi-
n
n
n
1104 (m), 1043 (m), 1002 (w), 923 (w), 844 (m), 825 (m), 742 (w),
655 (m), 580 (m), 552 (s), 482 (s), 435 (m), 360 (w). FT-Raman
ꢁ
ꢀ1
ꢀ1
madzu TGA-50 system at a heating rate of 5 C min under air. FT-
IR spectra were obtained as KBr pellets using an FTIR Mattson-7000
(cm
)
n
¼ 3129 (m), 3109 (w), 3020 (w), 2959 (w), 2013 (s), 1957
(vs),1935 (w),1903 (s),1110 (s),1058 (w),1043 (s), 465 (w), 440 (m),
ꢀ
1
spectrophotometer and recorded from 4000 to 350 cm . Raman
spectra were recorded on a Bruker RFS100/S FT instrument
417 (m), 394 (m), 362 (s), 341 (s), 156 (w), 140 (s), 124 (vs), 112 (vs).
1
H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K):
d
¼ 5.43 (s, 5H, Cp), 1.80 (s, 2H,
, 298 K):
¼ 239.3 (CO), 226.3
COOH), 93.8 (Cp), ꢀ4.5 (CH COOH).
13
(
Nd:YAG laser, 1064 nm excitation, InGaAs detector). Liquid-state
CH
2
COOH). C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl
3
d
1
13
H and C NMR spectra were measured with a Bruker Avance
00 instrument. Solid-state NMR spectra were recorded on a
(CO), 188.0 (CH
2
2
3
13
Bruker Avance 400 spectrometer. C cross polarization (CP) magic-
angle spinning (MAS) NMR spectra were recorded at 100.62 MHz
with 3.3
2.2.2. Zn,Al-CpMo
A yellow solution of the sodium salt [CpMo(CO)
3
2
CH COO]Na
1
ꢁ
m
s H 90 pulses, a 2 ms contact time, a spinning rate of
was prepared by addition of 1 equivalent of NaOH to an aqueous
1
2 kHz and 4 s recycle delays. Chemicals shifts are quoted in ppm
suspension (30 mL) of complex 1 (0.46 g, 1.50 mmol). A solution of
Zn(NO ) $6H O (0.59 g, 2.00 mmol) and Al(NO ) $9H O (0.37 g,
3 2 2 3 3 2
27
relative to TMS.
04.26 MHz using a
and 1 s recycle delays. Chemicals shifts are quoted in ppm relative
Al MAS NMR spectra were recorded at
1
p
/12 pulse of 0.78 s, a spinning rate of 14 kHz
m
1.00 mmol) in decarbonated deionized (DD) water (30 mL) was
then added dropwise, and the pH of the mixture was continuously
maintained between 7.5 and 8 using 0.2 M NaOH. After the addition
3
þ
to [Al(H
2
O)
6
]
.
ꢁ
Where appropriate, preparations and manipulations were car-
ried out using standard Schlenk techniques under nitrogen. The
chemicals sodium (Riedel-de-Haën), dicyclopentadiene (BDH),
was completed the reaction mixture was aged at 65 C for 19 h. The
resultant yellow solid was filtered, washed extensively with DD
water and acetone, and finally vacuum-dried. Anal. found: Mo,
ꢀ
1
Mo(CO)
6
(Fluka), 2-chloroacetamide (ClCH
2
CONH
2
, 98%, Sigmae
12.7%. FT-IR (KBr, cm ):
n
¼ 3448 (br), 2017 (vs,
n(CO)), 1950 (vs,
Aldrich), anhydrous n-pentane (95%, SigmaeAldrich), anhydrous
tetrahydrofuran (THF, 99.9%, SigmaeAldrich), anhydrous chloro-
form (99%, SigmaeAldrich), acetone (99%, SigmaeAldrich), hydro-
chloric acid (HCl, 37%, Fluka), zinc nitrate hexahydrate (99%, Fluka),
aluminum nitrate nonahydrate (98.5%, Riedel-de-Haën), 50%
n
(CO)), 1909 (vs, (CO)), 1633 (m), 1579 (m), 1491 (m), 1429 (m),
n
1360 (s), 1350 (s), 1261 (vw), 1113 (w), 1060 (w), 1014 (w), 825 (m),
790 (w), 748 (w), 625 (bd), 580 (w), 553 (w), 484 (m), 428 (m). FT-
ꢀ
1
Raman (cm ):
n
¼ 3119 (m), 2945 (w), 2022 (m), 1944 (m), 1110 (s),
13
1061 (w), 918 (w), 448 (w), 415 (w), 339 (s), 115 (s). C CP MAS
ꢀ
aqueous sodium hydroxide (Fluka), Na
-butyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide
[bmim]NTf , 99%, io-lo-tec) were obtained from commercial
2
CO
3
(J.M. Vaz Pereira), and
NMR:
d
¼ 242.8 (CO), 232.0 (CO), 227.0 (CO), 191.5 (CH
2
CO
2
), 177.0
2
ꢀ
ꢀ
27
1
(
(CO
3
), 94.0 (Cp), 1.3 (CH
2
CO
2
). Al MAS NMR:
d
¼ 13.5.
2
sources and used as received. The solution of tert-butylhydroper-
oxide (TBHP) in decane (5e6 M, SigmaeAldrich, <4% water) was
dried over activated 4 A molecular sieves prior to use. The Zn,Al-
2.3. Catalytic tests
ꢀ
NO
3þ
coprecipitation of the Zn and Al hydroxides (initial Zn /Al
3
LDH precursor was prepared by the standard method of
The catalytic reactions were carried out under air (autogenous
pressure) and stirred magnetically (1000 rpm) in a closed borosil-
icate reactor (10 mL capacity) equipped with a valve for sampling,
2
þ
3þ
2þ
molar ratio in solution ¼ 2) in the presence of nitrate ions at con-
ꢁ
ꢁ
stant pH (7.5e8) under nitrogen, followed by aging at 80 C for 20 h
and immersed in an oil bath thermostated at 55 C. Typically, the
[
19]. After washing, the material was stored as an aqueous sus-
reactor was loaded with catalyst (18
(1.8 mmol, cis-cyclooctene (Cy) or -pinene (Pin)) and 5e6 M TBHP
in decane (ca. 2.75 mmol). When stated, 150 L of [bmim]NTf was
mmol of molybdenum), olefin
pension in a closed container.
a
m
2
2
2
.2. Synthesis
used as a cosolvent. The olefin, oxidant and (when used) IL were
heated in separate vessels (10 min at the reaction temperature)
prior to addition to the reactor (with preheated walls) containing
the catalyst. Time zero (i.e., the initial instant of the reaction) was
taken as the moment the oxidant was added to the reactor. The
.2.1. CpMo(CO)
3
CH
2
COOH (1)
CpMo(CO) CH COOH (1) was synthesized according to the
3 2
general procedure described by Ariyaratne et al. [20]. A detailed
description of the preparation is given here. Freshly cut sodium
ꢁ
leaching tests were performed by separating the solid (at 55 C)
(
0.78 g, 34.0 mmol) was added to 40 mL of dicyclopentadiene under
from the reaction mixture after 2 h, using a 0.2
membrane; the filtrate was stirred for a further 22 h at 55 C. The
course of the reactions was monitored using a Varian 3800 GC
m
m PTFE GVS
ꢁ
ꢁ
inert atmosphere. The mixture was refluxed overnight at 160 C.
The resultant suspension was filtered and the remaining pink solid
Please cite this article in press as: A.C. Gomes, et al., Journal of Organometallic Chemistry (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.jorganchem.2013.10.037