6
58
T. Janeczko et al. / Steroids 74 (2009) 657–661
◦
ganisms and then incubated for 3–7 days at 25 C on a rotary shaker.
After full growth of the culture (about 12 g of cell dry weight/l)
Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK (fax: +44 1223 336033 or e-mail:
2
0 mg of a substrate dissolved in 1 ml of acetone was added. After
2.5. Spectral data of isolation metabolites
1, 3, 6 and 9 days of incubation under the above conditions, portions
of 10 ml of the transformation mixture were taken out and extracted
2
.5.1. 14˛-Hydroxyandrost-4-en-3,17-dione (6)
with CHCl3 (3× 10 ml). The extracts were dried over MgSO , con-
4
1
H NMR (CDCl ) ı (ppm); 1.03 (s, 3H, 18-CH ) 1.20 (s, 3H, 19-
3
3
centrated in vacuo and analyzed on GC. All the experiments were
repeated three times.
−
1
CH ) 5.73 (s, 4-H). IR ꢄmax (cm ): 3492 (OH), 2930 (C–H), 1728 and
3
+
1658 (C O); GC–MS m/z (int., %) 302 [M ], 302 (89), 285 (100), 273
(
(
75), 251 (35), 227 (25), 213 (39), 183 (19), 183 (15), 149 (39), 123
44), 108 (54), 91 (72), 79 (39), 55 (31).
2.3. Preparative biotransformation
The same transformation were performed on the preparative
2
.5.2. 6ˇ,17ˇ-Dihydroxyandrost-4-en-3-one (7)
scale in 2000 ml flasks, each containing 500 ml of the cultivation
medium. The cultures were incubated under the same condi-
tions and then 200 mg of substrate dissolved in 2 ml of acetone
was added to the grown cultures. After 9 days of incubation the
1
H NMR (CDCl ) ı (ppm); 0.81 (s, 3H, 18-CH ), 1.38 (s, 3H, 19-
3
3
CH ), 3.65 (t, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, H-17␣), 4.34 (br s, 1H, W = 15.1 Hz, H-
6
3
h
−
1
␣), 5.81 (s, 1H, H-4); IR ꢄmax (cm ): 3392 (OH), 2940 and 2881
(C–H), 1666 (C O).
mixtures were extracted with CHCl3 (3× 300 ml), dried (MgSO )
4
and concentrated in vacuo. The transformation products were
separated by column chromatography and analyzed (TLC, GC,
GC–MS).
2.5.3. 6ˇ-Hydroxyandrost-4-en-3,17-dione (8)
1
H NMR (CDCl ) ı (ppm); 0.93 (s, 3H, 18-CH ) 1.39 (s, 3H, 19-
3
3
CH ) 4.39 (br s, 1H, W = 16.7 Hz, H-6␣), 5.82 (s, 1H, H-4); IR ꢄmax
3
h
−
1
(
(
cm ): 3398 (OH), 2930 (C–H), 1731 and 1661 (C O); GC–MS m/z
int., %) 302 [M ], 302 (100), 286 (34), 273 (79), 246 (15), 232 (5),
2
.4. Analytical methods
+
2
14 (19), 189 (9), 176 (5), 149 (19), 137 (36), 124 (24), 91 (32), 79
The course of biotransformation was controlled by means of
(17), 67 (39), 55 (15).
TLC. Composition of product mixtures was established by GC.
Products were separated by column chromatography using sil-
ica gel (Kieselgel 60, 230–400 mesh, Merck) and hexane/acetone
mixture (2:1, v/v) as the eluent. Analytical TLC was carried out
on silica gel G (Merck) with different developing systems. Com-
pounds were detected by spraying the plates with H SO /CH OH
2.5.4. 6ˇ,14˛-Dihydroxypregnan-4-en-3,20-dione (9)
Crystal data: C21H30O , M = 346.45, colourless needle, crys-
w
4
tal dimensions 0.20 mm × 0.10 mm × 0.10 mm, monoclinic, space
◦
group P2 , a = 7.449(2), b = 10.116(2), c = 11.866(2) Å, ˇ = 94.35(3) ,
1
3
−3
,
2
4
3
V = 891.6(3) Å , Z = 2, Dc = 1.291 Mg m
T = 100(2) K, R = 0.046,
mixture (1:1, v/v). GC analysis was performed using a Hewlett-
Packard 5890A (Series II) GC instrument fitted with a flame
ionization detector (FID). The HP-5 (crosslinked phenyl methyl
siloxane) capillary column (30 m × 0.32 mm × 0.25 m) was used to
determine the composition of product mixtures. The following tem-
wR = 0.074 (for 1181 reflections with I > 2ꢅ(I)) for 226 variables.
CCDC No. 697460.
2.5.5. 3ˇ,7˛-Dihydroxyandrost-5-en-17-one (10)
1
H NMR (CDCl3) ı (ppm); 0.86 (s, 3H, 18-CH3), 0.99 (s, 3H, 19-
◦
◦
◦
perature programme was used: 200 C (0 min)/10 C/min/270 C
CH3), 3.56 (m, 1H, Wh = 26.4 Hz, H-3␣), 3.96 (s br, 1H, Wh = 14.2 Hz,
◦
◦
−1
+
(
0 min)/30 C/min/300 C (5 min). The NMR spectra were recorded
H-7), 5.62 (dd, 1H, J = 5.2, 1.5 Hz, H-6); IR ꢄmax (cm ): 3393 (OH),
on DRX 500 MHz Bruker spectrometer and measured in CDCl3.
Optical rotations were measured on an Autopol IV automatic
polarimeter (Rudolph). MS analyses were performed on a Varian
Chrompack GC CP-3800 Saturn 2000GC/MS/MS with an ionizing
energy of 70 eV. IR spectra were recorded on Mattson IR 300 Thermo
Nicolet spectrophotometer. MS analyses were performed on a Var-
ian Chrompack GC CP-3800 Saturn 2000GC/MS/MS with an ionizing
energy of 70 eV.
2931 (C–H), 1731 (C O); GC–MS m/z (int., %) 304 [M ], 304 (9), 286
(100), 271 (31), 253 (15), 197 (3), 175 (5), 159 (9), 143 (6), 131 (11),
105 (7), 91 (12), 79 (7), 67 (9), 55 (5).
2.5.6. 7˛-Hydroxyandrost-4-en-3,17-dione (11)
1
H NMR (CDCl3) ı (ppm); 0.91 (s, 3H, 18-CH3) 1.21 (s, 3H, 19-
−
1
CH3) 4.09 (s, 1H, H-7), 5.82 (s, 1H, H-4); IR ꢄmax (cm ): 3521 and
3379 (OH), 2932 (C–H), 1731 and 1659 (C O), 1607 (C C).
Crystallographic measurement was performed at 100 K using
an Oxford Cryosystem device on
a
Kuma KM4CCD ꢀ-axis
3. Results and discussion
diffractometer with a graphite-monochromated Mo K␣ radia-
tion (ꢁ = 0.71073 Å). The data were corrected for Lorentz and
polarization effects. No absorption correction was applied. Data
reduction and analysis were carried out with the CrysAlis CCD
and CrysAlis Red programs [16]. Structure was solved by direct
methods (program SHELXS97) and refined by the full matrix
least-squares method on all F2 data using the SHELXL97 pro-
grams [17]. Non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic
displacement parameters; hydrogen atoms were placed in cal-
culated positions or found in ꢂꢃ maps. Before the last cycle
of refinement all H atoms were fixed and were allowed to
ride on their parent atoms. The Friedel pairs were merged
before the final refinement. The absolute structure was chosen
on the basis of known absolute configuration of the sub-
strate.
3.1. Identification of products
The products structures were determined by means of IR, 1H
NMR, 13C NMR and correlation spectroscopy (HQMC). All the prod-
ucts obtained proved to be secondary alcohols. The locations and
orientations of the introduced hydroxyl groups were determined
on the basis of the chemical shifts and the shapes of CHOH signals
1
13
in the H NMR spectra and also confirmed by C NMR and corre-
lation NMR spectroscopy (Table 1). For compound 9 the structure
was additionally confirmed by crystallographic analysis.
3.1.1. 14˛-Hydroxyandrost-4-en-3,17-dione (6)
The mass of the molecular ion (M 302) is larger by 16 than the
one for androstenedione (1), which indicates hydroxylation of the
+
Crystallographic data for crystal 9 in this paper, have been
deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as
supplementary publication CCDC 697460. Copies of the data can
be obtained, free of charge, on application to CCDC, 12 Union
substrate. Whereas, lack of a signal in the range 3–5 ppm in the
H NMR spectrum indicates that the hydroxylation occurred at a
tertiary carbon atom. The singlet of 18-CH3 is significantly shifted
1
towards lower field by 0.13 ppm, and also the signals of 19-CH and
3