6
878
M. Boukraa et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 6876–6879
A molecular modeling study was investigated with the LuxR
3
0
model and compounds 3b, 11b as well as with the previously
1
9
31
6
reported C5 sulfonamide and 3-oxo-C -HSL. All compounds
showed similar binding modes interacting with conserved residues
Trp66, Tyr62, Asp79 (Figs. 2A and B). Distances between key atoms
involved in hydrogen bonds were not significantly different for
C@O or S@O groups and basically identical for the NH group (Table
2
3
). Modeling of compound 3b compared to the natural ligand
-oxo-C -HSL, (Fig. 2A) showed a different orientation of the lac-
6
3
1
tone and the alkyl chain. For compound 11b (Fig. 2B) versus C5 sul-
fonamide, a different orientation of the sulfonamide function is
observed with two hydrogen bonds with Tyr62 for 11b and only
one for C5 sulfonamide. In both cases, it is seen that the NH func-
tion locations are nearly superimposable. Antagonist activity of
reverse analogues can be explained by the necessary adaptation
of the location of the molecule when forced to match as much as
possible the H-bond network imposed by the binding site.
In conclusion, new AHL analogues, designed by replacing the
amide function by a reverse-amide or a reverse-sulfonamide one,
have been prepared and their activity as QS modulators has been
evaluated. Some reverse-amides
butyrolactones] and reverse-sulfonamides
amide)- -butyrolactones] having short alkyl side chains exhibited
significant QS antagonist activity, the most active having a 30
[a
-(N-alkyl-carboxamide)-
c-
[
a-(N-alkyl-sulfon-
c
lM
IC50
.
Altering the lactone to a cyclopentanone in the reverse carbox-
amides did not result in significant change in the activity. Finally,
N-methylated reveres-amides proved to be inactive. Besides the
interest of enlarging the structural scope of AHL antagonists, these
results also point out the key role of the NH group in the position-
ing of the AHL analogue in the binding site.
Acknowledgments
6
Figure 2. (A) Proposed binding modes of reverse amide 3b (in blue) and 3-oxo-C -
HSL (in green). (B) Proposed binding modes of reverse-sulfonamide 10b (in blue)
and C5 sulfonamide (in pink).
Financial support from MESR, CNRS, and the ‘Cluster de recher-
che chimie/infectiologie de la Région Rhône-Alpes’ is gratefully
acknowledged. M.S. is the recipient of a scholarship from the clus-
ter. We warmly thank Dr. Sylvie Reverchon for helpful discussions
and assistance during biological evaluation.
Table 2
Hydrogen bonds network with distances in Å between residues Trp66, Tyr62 and
Asp79 and different functions of 3-oxo-C
6
-HSL, reverse-amide 3b, C5-sulfonamide19
and reverse-sulfonamide 11b
Supplementary data
Trp66
Tyr62
Asp79
Supplementary data (experimental section for synthesis, bio-
3
-oxo-C
Reverse amide 3b
C5) Sulfonamide
6
-HSL
2.3 (C@O
lactone)
2.3 (C@O
lactone)
2.6 (C@O
lactone)
2.3 (C@O
lactone)
3.0 (C@O amide)
3.0
(NH)
3.0
(NH)
3.0
(NH)
2.9
2.8 (C@O amide)
3.1 (S@O)
(
References and notes
Reverse sulfonamide
1b
2.9 and 2.9
(O@S@O)
1.
Waters, C. M.; Bassler, B. L. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2005, 21, 319.
1
(NH)
2. Camilli, A.; Bassler, B. L. Science 2006, 311, 1113.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Reading, N. C.; Sperandio, V. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2006, 254, 1.
Gonzalez, J. E.; Keshavan, N. D. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2006, 70, 859.
Ng, W.-L.; Bassler, B. L. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2009, 43, 197.
Uroz, S.; Dessaux, Y.; Oger, P. Chembiochem 2009, 10, 205.
the mixture of the two diastereoisomers (IC50 = 200
single one (IC50 = 92
IC50 = 40 M).
The two sulfonamides 11a and 11b possessing side chains of
similar length as those in the most active QS inhibitors AHL ana-
l
M) or for the
7. Persson, T.; Givskov, M.; Nielsen, J. Curr. Med. Chem. 2005, 12, 3103.
8
9
.
.
Geske, G. D.; O’Neill, J. C.; Blackwell, H. E. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 1432.
Ni, N.; Li, M.; Wang, J.; Wang, B. Med. Res. Rev. 2009, 29, 65.
l
M), as compared to cyclopentanone 7a
(
l
10. Richards, J.; Melander, C. Chembiochem 2009, 10, 2287.
11. Hassett, D. J.; Korfhagen, T. R.; Irvin, R. T.; Schurr, M. J.; Sauer, K.; Lau, G. W.;
Sutton, M. D.; Yu, H.; Hoiby, N. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2010, 14, 117.
12. Kalia, V. C.; Purohit, H. J. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2011, 37, 121.
1
9
logues sulfonamides were found to decrease bioluminescence.
However, the shorter butyl derivative 11a exhibited a rather low
13. Choudhary, S.; Schmidt-Dannert, C. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 86,
1267.
activity (IC50 >200
lM), whereas the N-pentylsulfonamide 11b
14. Churchill, M. A. E.; Chen, L. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 68.
15. Decho, A. W.; Frey, R. L.; Ferry, J. L. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 86.
16. Tepliski, M.; Mathesius, U.; Rumbaugh, K. P. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 100.
17. Stevens, A. M.; Queneau, Y.; Soulere, L.; von Bodman, S.; Doutheau, A. Chem.
Rev. 2011, 111, 4.
was significantly more active (IC50 = 70
lM). Consistently with
amides versus reverse-amides, the reverse-sulfonamides exhibit
lower activities compared to the sulfonamides, clearly confirming
the key role of the a-amidolactone system in AHL binding.
18. Galloway, W. R. J. D.; Hodgkinson, J. T.; Bowden, S. D.; Welch, M.; Spring, D. R.
Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 28.