J. L. Burnett et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 43 (2002) 2431–2433
2433
Table 1. Initial rates of aminolysis for EDA and 1–5 and initial rates relative to EDA
Generation
Amines per molecule
Concentration (mM)a
Initial rate (M s−1
)
Relative rate to EDA
−
−
−
−
−
−
10
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
2
4
8
16
32
64
3.2
1.6
0.8
0.4
0.2
0.1
4.03×10
2.40×10
5.20×10
9.02×10
1.12×10
8.63×10
1
5.95
12.89
22.35
27.56
21.4
9
9
8
9
a
Relative amine concentration is 6.4 mM in each case (and p-nitrophenyl acetate concentration is 0.014 mM).
As expected, the results confirm that there is a hydro-
phobic effect operating here, i.e. the larger dendrimers
molecules to the hydrophobic environment within the
dendrimer.
(
>generation 2) are acting as static covalent micelles
and solubilising the p-nitrophenyl acetate within the
inner hydrophobic regions of the dendrimers. This
increase in effective molarity of the reagents therefore
contributes significantly to the observed rate enhance-
ments in the larger dendrimers. As postulated previ-
ously, the rate enhancements can also be attributed to a
second factor involving the dendrimers internal amide
groups, which are able to stabilise the tetrahedral tran-
sition state formed between the amine and the p-nitro-
phenyl acetate. The presence of this transition state
stabilisation effect accounts for the fact that the small
dendrimers (generations 1 and 2) have faster aminolysis
rates than the simple amine, EDA (G0). For example,
the first generation dendrimer (four amines) is six times
more reactive than EDA, despite the fact that it is still
effectively a small molecule that does not provide a
hydrophobic environment for substrate molecules.
Thus, it is clear that there is no hydrophobic effect
operating and the substantial increase in rate is due
solely to the ability of the first generation dendrimer to
form a tetrahedral intramolecular transition state,
which lowers the energy of activation (DG) for the
aminolysis reaction and results in a faster rate. As the
dendrimers increase in size, the increase in initial rates
continues (up to generation 4). Therefore, we conclude
that this increase in rate is due to transition state
stabilisation and hydrophobic binding.
References
1. Zeng, X.; Cheng, Y. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2000, 21,
449.
2. (a) Cheng, S.; Zeng, X. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2000, 21,
655; (b) Cordes, E. H. Reaction Kinetics in Micelles;
Plenum Press: New York, 1973.
3. (a) Bunton, C. A.; Bacaloglu, R. J. Colloid Interf. Sci.
1987, 115, 288; (b) Baumucker, J.; Calzadilla, M.; Cen-
teno, M.; Lehrmann, G.; Urdanela, M.; Lindquist, P.;
Dunham, D.; Price, M.; Sears, D.; Cordes, E. H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 8164; (c) Swiswanto, C.; Battal, T.;
Schuss, O. F.; Rathman, J. F. Langmuir 1997, 13, 6047.
4. Monti, D.; Tagliatesta, P.; Mancini, G.; Boschi, T.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1998, 37, 1131.
5. Jaeger, D. A.; Robertson, R. E. J. Org. Chem. 1977, 42,
3298.
6. (a) Van Mersbergen, D.; Wijnen, J. W.; Engberts, J. B. F.
N. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 8801; (b) Jaeger, D. A.; Wang,
D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 6415; (c) Newkome, G. R.;
Moorfield, C. N.; V o¨ gtle, F. Dendritic Molecules: Con-
cepts, Synthesis and Perspectives; VCH: Weinheim, 1996.
7. Lee, J. J.; Ford, W. T. Macromolecules 1994, 27, 4632.
8. (a) Twyman, L. J.; Beezer, A. E.; Esfand, R.; Hardy, M.
J.; Mitchell, J. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 1743; (b)
Esfand, R.; Beezer, A. E.; Mitchell, J. C.; Twyman, L. J.
Pharm. Sci. 1996, 2, 157.
This observed trend in reactivity was not surprising,
considering the properties of the PAMAM dendrimers.
It has been reported in the literature that there is a
transition from an extended to a globular closed shell
conformation for related amine terminated den-
9. Hawker, C. J.; Wooley, K. L.; Fr e´ chet, J. M. J. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1993, 1287.
10. Piotti, M. E.; Rivera, F.; Bond, R.; Hawker, C. J.;
Fr e´ chet, J. M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9471.
11. Martin, I. K.; Twyman, L. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42,
1123.
12. Evans, D. J.; Kanagasooriam, A.; Williams, A. J. Mol.
Catal. 1993, 85, 21.
13. An acetonitrile solution of p-nitrophenyl acetate (0.14 M,
0.1 ml) was added to a solution of amine (6.4 mM w.r.t.
amine groups) in buffered water at pH 8.5 (0.1 M TRIS
buffer, 1.9 ml) in a quartz UV cuvette (with stirring, at
room temperature) and the UV absorbance at 410 nm
was measured every 30 s over a period of 20 min.
14. The mechanism is complicated and we were unable to fit
the data to simple first- or second-order kinetics therefore
initial rates were used.
1
5
drimers. Similarly, we have observed that there is a
change in behaviour, i.e. a break in the pattern regard-
ing rate enhancement between generation 4 (32 amines)
and 5 (64 amines). The fourth generation dendrimer
still has a relatively open and flexible structure, which
allows substrate molecules to enter and reside in the
large hydrophobic interior (and facilitates the forma-
tion of the T transition state), so a maximum in the
d
rate enhancement for this dendrimer is observed, i.e.
the conditions are optimum for aminolysis rate
enhancement. The initial rate with the 64 amine den-
drimer is lower than for generation 4 (and similar to
that observed for generation 3), which is presumably
due to the fact that the surface of the dendrimer is
highly crowded preventing access of the substrate
15. Jansen, J. F. J. A.; Meijer, E. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995,
117, 4417.