3166
J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 108, No. 8, 22 February 1998
Kreher, Rinnenthal, and Gericke
simple, direct reaction mechanism without complex forma-
tion. The reaction must be fast without time left for energy
redistribution.
Furthermore, the product vibrational energy is strongly
influenced by the initial vibrational state of HCN. The vibra-
tional energy of the CN product distribution in the chlorine
reaction could qualitatively be explained by the nodal pattern
of the vibrational wave function of the HCN molecule.
Hence the CN product vibration is a consequence of the ini-
tial vibrational excitation of the HCN molecule. This is again
in accordance with the spectator model in which the nonre-
acting CN bond does not participate in the reaction and is
confirmed by the observation that neither different collisional
energies of the reactants nor different masses of the reacting
atom ͑H/Cl͒ have a significant influence on the vibrational
distribution of CN.
Reactions from different rotational states of HCN(3
ϭ4) show the influence of an initial rotation of HCN on the
reaction. The rotational excitation of HCN promotes the
ClϩHCN reaction very efficiently, suggesting a geometrical
constraint on the reaction. At low rotations of HCN, the re-
action can occur only if the Cl atom approaches on the H
atom end of HCN, whereas at fast rotations of HCN, the Cl
atom has sufficient time to find the ideal approach geometry.
These observations suggest that the relative orientation of the
reactants strongly affects the reaction rate, which is con-
firmed by our measurements with optically aligned reactants.
In the case of HϩHCN and ClϩHCN the CN is predomi-
nantly formed in a collinear reaction geometry, but for the
latter reaction there is less restriction to a collinear geometry
if the CH bond in HCN is highly vibrationally excited. The
additional experimental measurements have changed our
original picture of the reaction dynamics, namely with regard
to the existence of complex formation21 ͓gained from similar
results of HCN͑004͒ and HCN͑302͒ reactions͔, now favoring
a pure direct abstraction. The conclusion agrees with theo-
retical results of Harding13 and Bair et al. who predict the
lowest energy route for both reactions to be a direct, collin-
ear abstraction. The detailed information from our measure-
ments offers a possibility for comparison with results ob-
tained from quasiclassical trajectory studies or quantum
mechanical calculations.
FIG. 13. Vibrational state distribution of CN for the reactions
HϩHCN(002) ͑upper part͒ and HϩHCN(004) ͑lower part͒. Comparison of
the results obtained from the experiment and the trajectory study is shown.
7
M. J. Bronikowski, W. R. Simpson, and R. N. Zare, J. Phys. Chem. 97,
2
194 ͑1993͒.
8
9
S. S. Brown, R. B. Metz, H. L. Berghout, and F. F. Crim, J. Chem. Phys.
105, 6293 ͑1996͒.
T. Arusi-Parpar, R. P. Schmid, R.-J. Li, I. Bar, and S. Rosenwaks, Chem.
Phys. Lett. 268, 163 ͑1997͒.
J. Berkowitz, G. B. Ellison, and D. Gutman, J. Phys. Chem. 98, 2744
͑1994͒.
M. J. Frost, I. W. Smith, and R. D. Spencer-Smith, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday
Trans. 89, 2355 ͑1993͒.
10
1
1
1
2
I. R. Sims and I. W. M. Smith, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. II 85, 915
͑
1989͒.
1
1
3
4
L. B. Harding, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 10123 ͑1996͒.
J. de Juan, S. Callister, H. Reisler, G. A. Segal, and C. J. Wittig, J. Chem.
Phys. 89, 1977 ͑1988͒.
H. Schacke, H. Gg. Wagner, and J. B. Wolfrum, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys.
Chem. 81, 670 ͑1977͒.
R. A. Bair and T. H. Dunning, Jr., J. Chem. Phys. 82, 2280 ͑1985͒.
H. M. Lambert, T. Carrington, S. V. Filseth, and C. M. Sadowski, J. Phys.
Chem. 97, 128 ͑1993͒.
G. W. Johnston and R. Bersohn, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 7096 ͑1989͒.
I. R. Sims and I. W. M. Smith, Chem. Phys. Lett. 149, 565 ͑1988͒.
Q. Sun and J. M. Bowman, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 5201 ͑1990͒.
C. Kreher, R. Theinl, and K.-H. Gericke, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 4481
1
5
16
1
1
6
7
1
8
19
2
2
0
1
͑
1996͒.
2
2
2
2
3
4
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
C. Kreher, R. Theinl, and K.-H. Gericke, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 8901
1995͒.
͑
We thank Professor F. J. Comes for helpful discussions
and material support. C.K. thanks the Fonds der Chemischen
Industrie for fellowship support. Financial support by the
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft is gratefully acknowl-
edged.
J. M. Pfeiffer, R. B. Metz, J. D. Thoemke, E. Woods III, and F. F. Crim,
J. Chem. Phys. 104, 4490 ͑1996͒.
R. B. Metz, J. D. Thoemke, J. M. Pfeiffer, and F. F. Crim, Chem. Phys.
Lett. 221, 347 ͑1994͒.
Y. Matsumi, K. Tonokura, and M. Kawasaki, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 1065
͑1992͒.
E. Jensen, J. S. Keller, G. C. G. Waschewsky, J. E. Stevens, and R. L.
Graham, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 2882 ͑1993͒.
S. H. S. Wilson, M. N. R. Ashfold, and R. N. Dixon, J. Chem. Phys. 101,
7538 ͑1994͒.
H. Sasada, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 767 ͑1988͒.
K. R. German and W. S. Gornall, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 71, 1452 ͑1981͒.
A. M. Smith, S. L. Coy, and W. Klemperer, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 134, 134
͑1989͒.
D. H. Rank and G. Skrinko, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 50, 421 ͑1960͒.
A. M. Smith and U. G. Jo”rgensen, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 5649 ͑1987͒.
A. E. Douglas and D. Sharma, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 21, 448 ͑1953͒.
D. Romanini and K. K. Lehmann, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 633 ͑1995͒.
25
2
6
1
27
F. F. Crim, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 12725 ͑1996͒.
R. L. Vander Wal, J. L. Scott, and F. F. Crim, J. Chem. Phys. 94, 1859
2
2
8
͑1991͒.
3
29
I. Bar, Y. Cohen, D. David, T. Arusi-Parpar, S. Rosenwaks, and J. J.
Valentini, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 3341 ͑1991͒.
R. J. Barnes, A. F. Gross, and A. Sinha, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 1284 ͑1997͒.
J. D. Thoemke, J. M. Pfeiffer, R. B. Metz, and F. F. Crim, J. Phys. Chem.
3
0
4
5
31
3
2
9
9, 13748 ͑1995͒.
6
33
R. B. Metz, J. D. Thoemke, J. M. Pfeiffer, and F. F. Crim, J. Chem. Phys.
9, 1744 ͑1993͒.
3
4
9
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
40.254.87.149 On: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:17:39
1